2026 Iran War Strategy and Analysis

protonme18

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just read IDF ceasefire only to cover on their backside, but not on Lebanon assault, means their forward attack and war goal to reach the Litani River water source is continuing. At least, it take care of Iranian ballistic assault on their homeland, reprieve for their interceptors stockpiles to face and deal with only Hezbollahs rocket fired. They don't need to worry look over the mirror on their behind and focus to reach Litani river border and further. Told you guys, everything are military goals.....it serves what can be relief, what can be continued, as long it serve the purpose. Can't deal with 2~3 fronts and at least let's take 1 side only. That's the calculation
 

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member
My understanding is Vice President JD Vance will lead the negotiations. If the negotiations do move forward in a positive manner, I expect Vance will send Trump's chosen negotiators, Witkoff and Kushner, back home and bring in his own team. This is Vance's opportunity to strike at the king and I'm pretty sure he's going to take it. Trump is a tired old man with many people and organizations tired of him. The Iranians know this (they already said Vance was acceptable) and will adjust as best they can to ensure Vance is President if (when) negotiations are successful.

However, Israel and its American zealots are the spoiler, especially since Trump has been their best vassal ever. Vance's dangers are twofold: Israel breaking the ceasefire; and Israel taking action to remove him from the negotiations. There are state and corporate powers that might move to prevent this. Israel's grasp for Greater Israel risks returning to 1948.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Just read IDF ceasefire only to cover on their backside, but not on Lebanon assault, means their forward attack and war goal to reach the Litani River water source is continuing. At least, it take care of Iranian ballistic assault on their homeland, reprieve for their interceptors stockpiles to face and deal with only Hezbollahs rocket fired. They don't need to worry look over the mirror on their behind and focus to reach Litani river border and further. Told you guys, everything are military goals.....it serves what can be relief, what can be continued, as long it serve the purpose
I think because Israel is not implementing the full 10 points, Iran can keep attacking them (which it is doing) and the USA will look at Israel like the monkey ass fool who's effing it up for everyone.
 

Maikeru

Colonel
Registered Member
I'm thinking this ceasefire just keeps getting extended and extended whilst talks drag on until it effectively becomes the new normal.
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
If this ceasefire really hardens into a permanent settlement while still keeping the essence of Iran’s 10-point plan as its base, then this would be something like 10 Vietnams rolled into one for the US in terms of strategic defeat, probably the largest in its entire history, even if Iran gives up something on the nuclear side.

This would go down as one of the most catastrophically stupid strategic decisions any leader has ever made.

Because it would not just mean that the US, through one blunder, in one month, helped turn a hostile Iran into a great power and threw away decades, possibly centuries, of Western dominance in one of the most critical regions in the world.

It would also mean lasting internal damage to the United States itself, a worse domestic political breakdown, worse relations with all of its own critical allies, and a real chance that both continue spiraling into something much uglier in the years ahead.

And that is before counting the military losses, possibly a quarter or even a third of important radars, interceptors, cruise missiles, and related systems burned through or lost, while gutting any credible path to containing China.

And even that is probably still incomplete. The second-order effects here are likely enormous, and many of them probably have not even shown themselves yet. God Bless Trump!
 

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member
Trump intended to have control over GCC petroleum and derivative products before his meeting with Xi next month. This control would be the basis for negotiations on critical minerals, rare earths and derivative products. That control is no longer possible and Trump is facing a highly annoyed Xi. A sacrifice is needed. Perhaps it will be Trump.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
If the US and Iran have differing points on the ceasefire plan (or have signed onto different versions of the plan due to miscommunication or misunderstanding), I have a suspicion this ceasefire will fall apart fairly quickly.

Given there already seems to be some inconsistencies between what each side interprets from the plan, this should be considered a fair possibility, sadly.
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
If the US and Iran have differing points on the ceasefire plan (or have signed onto different versions of the plan due to miscommunication or misunderstanding), I have a suspicion this ceasefire will fall apart fairly quickly.

Given there already seems to be some inconsistencies between what each side interprets from the plan, this should be considered a fair possibility, sadly.

I don't think there has been any misunderstanding privately between them.

Trump specifically named-dropped the "10-point plan" keyword in his post.

This was likely a prerequisite for Aragachi to confirm it in his own Tweet.

Iran actually already stated that there have been no negotiations with the US.

They dropped the 10-point plan through Pakistan as "take it or leave it."

Whether Trump wants to do more perfidy through this ceasefire...

Or capitulate for real, the fact that this is the "working basis" is huge.
 
Top