2026 Iran War Strategy and Analysis

H

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
Two week ceasefire doesn’t hurt Iran imo.

1. Reestablishing contact with cutoff units, reestablishing logistics, a little rest for the troops and commanders, and potentially resupply with Russianor China (or whoever) is way more beneficial to Iran than whatever assets USA brings into the theatre.

2. USA and Israel aren’t going to spawn more interceptors. Their magazines are running dry and burning more ammo is only going to put USA into a deeper strategic hole.

3. Iran can restart the war and close the strait at any point. Fishing for a deal is good to establish a baseline. If they don’t like it, resume the punishment and continue humiliating the entire West and the Gulf.
 
B

bebops

Junior Member
Registered Member
Patriot, Thaad missiles, tomahawks and stealth cruise missiles have a limited quantity and required time to produce. So US aren't magically going to produce thousands of them in 2 weeks.

Iran can use this time to replenish their humanitarian aid for long term, more ballistic raw materials from China.

For the rebuilding process, Iran needs to establish several capitals, besides Teran. Most of the bombings occurred in Teran

The conflict will resume in 2 weeks. I haven't seen any mentioning about nuclear materials being offered to the US in exchange for collecting toll at SOH.
 
Last edited:
I

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
HighGround said:
Two week ceasefire doesn’t hurt Iran imo.

1. Reestablishing contact with cutoff units, reestablishing logistics, a little rest for the troops and commanders, and potentially resupply with Russianor China (or whoever) is way more beneficial to Iran than whatever assets USA brings into the theatre.

2. USA and Israel aren’t going to spawn more interceptors. Their magazines are running dry and burning more ammo is only going to put USA into a deeper strategic hole.

3. Iran can restart the war and close the strait at any point. Fishing for a deal is good to establish a baseline. If they don’t like it, resume the punishment and continue humiliating the entire West and the Gulf.
Click to expand...
Israel isn't part of the ceasefire, Iran is bombing Israel right now.

Oh and they're also currently bombing Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, which is technically also not part of any ceasefire because they're not America lol
 
S

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
iewgnem said:
Except Hormuz isn't closed? Ships are already transiting by paying the toll and coordinating with Iranian military, which is what Iran said they'll continue to do, and what said they'll always do from now on. Framing it as some sort of Hormuz opening is an American face saving wording but Iranian sovereignty over ME energy is both current and future reality.

Israel also isn't part of any of this, Iran also just fired more missiles at Israel, so the war is still on, AD inventory are still being depleted.

I honestly didn't think US will ever even suggest they'd accept the 10 point demand for basically unconditional surrender and acknowledgement of Iranian annexation of Persian Gulf. US tapping out with Iranian in control of global energy AND Isarel continuing to get bombed is a pretty big W no matter how you try to spin it.

And obviously US will try to attack Iran again, the 1st point of the 10 point demand was never doable, but neither has Iran agreed to any ceasefire against Israel, it's a tactical reshuffling where Israel gets left to fight by themselves.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you are right, it does not look like the balance of power is changing in any fundamental way.

At the same time, the fact that Trump is even nominally willing to use Iran’s 10 points as the basis for a possible final settlement is already a significant victory for Iran by itself.

So what this may really mean is that after the US makes its last gamble, most likely some limited ground invasion, and fails, that is when we may finally see the real capitulation.
 
RedMetalSeadramon

RedMetalSeadramon

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think its okay, roughly speaking strategy wise attacks are more negatively affected than defense when it comes to interruptions.

Thus far we have.

US attack Iran
Israel attack Iran
Iran attack Israel
Iran attack Gulf/bases
Israel attacks Lebanon

Interruption works out in favor of Iran more. 2 weeks can get them a lot in terms of re-establishing command and control, coordination, logistics etc. Americans can sent more troops but 2 weeks isnt enough to get them too much that they dont already have, they're not gona put their hangers and PAVE PAW back together in 2 weeks only to have them hit when it restarts immediately.

You also drag it out closer to US midterms, closer to nuclear development. Iran benefits from dragging it out, and two weeks helps.

In all likelihood Israel breaks it within 1 week over Lebanon anyways.
 
G

GodRektsNoobs

Senior Member
Registered Member
vincent said:
The US will use the two weeks to gather its forces without having to worry about getting attacked in the staging areas.

Iran made a stupid move.
Click to expand...
Do keep in mind that this also gives Iranians 2 weeks to regroup to defensive positions in preparation for ground assault without the threat of US/Israeli air attacks.

Also, interceptors, SAM systems and radars don't magically spawn for US in the next 2 weeks. The best thing they could do is move their entire inventory of stand-off munitions, radar systems and SAMs from Europe and Asia to the Middle East. They couldn't do that previously as they couldn't risk unloading such valuable equipment while under fire from Iranian missiles and drones. And that would be a god allah-send for China and Russia.
 
Last edited:
N

NorthKimBestKim

New Member
Registered Member
Just to compare how DPRK "negotiates".

DPRK got mad that some turds from South were doing "small drone incursions" towards DPRK airspace, and the South said they regret this and that it is not them, but some rogue elements.

Then Kim "complimented" South for admitting that South had wrong behaviour, before telling South to Fvck Off anyway, Lol.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
B

bebops

Junior Member
Registered Member
I heard that Iran used manpads or shoulder rocket launchers to shoot down F15. They really need to give every troops one of those. Drones too.

Drones and shoulder rocket launchers are more effective than shooting with AK47.
 
FriedRiceNSpice

FriedRiceNSpice

Major
Serb said:
Unless there is something serious behind the scenes, we don't know. Like Russia and China supplying Iran heavily in the meantime as well in preparation for it.
Click to expand...
If China really did pressure Iran to accept, then they either know something we don't or are planning something. Who knows, perhaps Russia and China will announce joint military exercises in Iran scheduled for a week away? Then even Trump wouldn't dare to restart the conflict.
 
I

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
Serb said:
Yeah, you are right, it does not look like the balance of power is changing in any fundamental way.

At the same time, the fact that Trump is even nominally willing to use Iran’s 10 points as the basis for a possible final settlement is already a significant victory for Iran by itself.

So what this may really mean is that after the US makes its last gamble, most likely some limited ground invasion, and fails, that is when we may finally see the real capitulation.
Click to expand...
US neither can stage forces within 2 weeks nor will Iran allow US to gather any forces during the 2 weeks.
Also let's not forget both Iraq and Yemen are independent countries who make their own decisions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top