2025 Israel - Iranian conflict

So apparently assistance was offered but rejected by Iran. We will see how long they intend to go alone. It would explain why there was no mutual defense clause in the Russia-Iran agreement. Combined with Putin saying the Iranians aren’t interested in Russian Air defense. They don’t want to be dependent on foreign equipment or receive protection from foreign militaries.

Overbom said:

Smartest thing is for Iran to delay as much as possible and then do everything possible to rush Chinese aid and disperse it around the country asap.

Ofc that requires some degree of competency and non-racism, so I wouldn't hold my breath on that happening.

Click to expand...

Maybe they already have Chinese assistance. I mean, China did sign a $400b investment agreement with them, right? I'm sure it also includes some security measures. And it's probably better for both sides to keep it secret.

PLAwatcher12 said:

2: 2 wrongs never make right, just because someone does something horrible to you doesn’t mean you should do the same or that doing the same makes it okay especially when it comes to civilians.

Click to expand...

If they bomb your hospital FIRST, and you don't reply in kind, then you've just signaled to them that you're fine accepting such hits. Only when you bomb their hospital in revenge will Israelis understand that hey, maybe we shouldn't do this next time.

The argument you're presenting here is ridiculous and exactly the type that incentavises Israel to commit MORE war crimes. You said "just because Israel does war crimes doesn't mean Iran can also do it" ... come on.. seriously? That's like saying "just because America nuked Russia, doesn't mean Russia can nuke America" (negating MAD). This is literally latent supremacist talk, sugarcoated with clever aphorisms and philosophical claptrap.

I'm afraid this is the only language Israel understands - if condemnations from the entire globe, hundreds of resolutions against them, diplomacy & negotiations, etc., doesn't stop them, than nothing will except reciprocity.

I wouldn't persoanlly read too much into these public statements about no assistance, they're a threat to enemies as much as they are a reassurance for the public, basically "we're fine despite everything, our allies haven't even gotten involved yet." In other words, run of the mill propaganda during war. You should expect them to say it even if they were getting assistance.

You guys really need to stop with the Israeli hospital argument.
1. Iran claimed that the target was an Israeli military facility right next to it. Which was struck. Damage to the hospital was secondary from the shock wave and resulted mainly in broken windows.
2. That hospital is used to treat Israeli military conducting the genocide in Gaza.
3. Israel has already damaged hospitals in Iran. And conducted a deliberate, well publicized, campaign where they destroyed hospitals and kill doctors and first aid responders in Gaza.

...

Now, as the war drags on, Israel is firing interceptors faster than it can produce them. That has raised questions within the Israeli security establishment about whether the country will run low on air defense missiles before Iran uses up its ballistic arsenal, according to eight current and former officials.

Click to expand...

....

Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps announces expulsion orders for Israel's Dimona nuclear site

Click to expand...

.....

Weren't there reports that two Chinese ELINT ships entered the area? Who wants to bet they're only there for sightseeing?

This whole thing doesn't make sense on the surface. Airstrikes alone won't result in regime change, and there's no viable proxy for the US to use, the Iranians will rally and mobilize against the likes of Kurds and ISIS.

My hypothesis is that the US wants China or Russia to get involved by threatening to attack Iran, but neither are taking the bait.

solarz said:

Weren't there reports that two Chinese ELINT ships entered the area? Who wants to get they're only there for sightseeing?

This whole thing doesn't make sense on the surface. Airstrikes won't won't result in regime change, and there's no viable proxy for the US to use, the Iranians will rally and mobilize against the likes of Kurds and ISIS.

My hypothesis is that the US wants China or Russia to get involved by threatening to attack Iran, but neither are taking the bait.

Click to expand...

I think you have a pretty high likelihood of being right on this one. The whole thing is a bear trap and everyone is trying to trick someone else into stepping into it.

So did things die down today? Been almost an hour without a post in this thread! Hopefully this conflict dies with a whimper rather than a bang.

I wonder if the US "two week" decision period is to move more forces into the region as well as see how the conflict plays out?

Bellum_Romanum said:

My goodness!! What are you 12? The level of nonsense that comes out of your brain just makes me want to punch my computer because you sound like a damn child!!

Click to expand...

More like 21, which explains a lot - studied just enough to be able to read the words printed on books and newspapers, but not enough to understand and put into meaningful thoughts, yet so sure they already know everything about how the world works.

PLAwatcher12 said:

Im in college that’s all you need to know. [snip]

Click to expand...

PLAwatcher12 said:

No it’s because calling for mass death of civilians is evil and not moral. Just because Israel is commiting genocide doesn’t mean Israel deserves to be genocided again,

Click to expand...

Technically, you're justifying the genocide committed by Israel. "We can do genocide, but you can't" ... same logic as "we can have nukes, but you can't". I think you do not realize that you ARE a supremacist.

Who exactly is a civilian in Israel? Only the local Arab population is civilian and maybe the tiny communities such as the Druze, Samaritan, and Armenian Quarter (but only those who didn't enlist in IDF). The rest, the vast majority of Jews, are literally foreign invaders, settler-colonialists with all adults bar Haredi having served in IDF.

The correct word is: "non-combatant".
When the British invaded Hind, their total population during the occupation never exceeded 62,000, among which ~30,000 were soldiers and ~30,000 non-combatants (administrators, engineers, professionals, etc); none of them qualified as civilian. That's what Israelis are.