so, you're stating, unequivocally, that, you know, factually, that romney's business, his olympics administration, and his gubernatorial administration, were gender egalitarian environments, and that, in those environments, women were paid equal to men?
okay! i'd simply suggest, that, if you want other, critical thinkers to accept that belief, you might seek to substantiate it with evidence, and not with the lack of evidence.
LOL! You're kidding, right?
Here's some critical thinking for you.
The best evidence is that the Chicago Machine for Obama has spent pover $600 million dollars to try and make Romney look negative, including towards women with the whole war on women false narrative. (Which is backfiring badly on them because most women are more interested in a decent job than in a $10-15 dollar a month birth control stipend...and Obama's numbers as regards woman's unemployment are worse than for men). Anyhow, that is their mantra...the chief agenda and central point of their plan for re-election.
Nothing regarding specifics regarding this issue have been found regarding Romney. Nothing. The only thing we have is last week's play on words by Obama regarding that if Romney says he is for equal pay for equal work, and will not sign the Democratic bill regarding the same, then he must have "Romnesia."
That's all they have come up with on that issue...and you saw how I responded to it.
We have specific allegations by members of Obama's own White House staff, and we have actual reports showing the disparity of 18% in the White House staff itself. He has his own probklems in this areana and trying to find something on Romney is only going to draw attention to it.
So, I have nothing to prove. The burden is on the Democrats to do so. That's the critical part of the thinking that has to go on in an election. And their efforts to date have not only been woefully short, as I said, they have their own problems with the issue he claims as a strong point.
Now, I do not discount something coming up just before the election, when it will be impossible for Romney to counter it...but I do not believe people will buy that. Just too coincidental should it occur.
But to date, the Chicago machine has spent a lot of money to show us that Romney carried a Dog on the top of his car 30 years ago (when his own words in his book indicate that he ate dogs), that he had a tussle with a young man in high school almost 650 years ago, and then the false claims that he was responsible for a woman's death where he stopped working for the companby seven years before it occurred and where the company itself had divested itself of the company that failed 3-5 years before...and where the woman had her own insurance anywway. in addition you have the supposed tax cheat claim, which Romney has proved wrong after he allowed the DNC enough rope to hang itself on that issue before releasing his own info. Prettuy smart move on his part in my mind.
But that's all they have got. That's why with the two debates and the speech at the Catholic charity dinner, when Romney showed up before a national audience in the tens of millions each time, and came across as thoughtful, normal, compassionate, caring leader with a plan, their whole campaign tanked and this huge turnaround in the polls has occurred and been maintained.
A couple of more weeks and we'll know. But I can hardly see how telling me to prove that Romney has never discriminated against women will help the DNC cause. So there is not critical thinking involved in that...just more straw men. Their own efforts to find something and spending hundreds of millions on the effort, and not having found it, makes the claim for me.
