Can you name any company which produces those tools used to make Chinese subs props?China is now one of the world's top producers to such advanced tooling.
Can you name any company which produces those tools used to make Chinese subs props?China is now one of the world's top producers to such advanced tooling.
The Soviets were able to produce advance propellers using conventional toolings, but the Toshiba CNC machines allow them to mass produce the advance propellers at a much higher rate.I remember ... I think in 1980s ... Toshiba secretly sold high tech CNC machine to USSR, so Soviets was able to produce much better propellers for the subs
Chinese subs have been using the most advanced prop designs for at least 2 decades. They are a bit slow on moving to pumpjets, but that's a very react addition to even western subs, and hopefully they are introduced with the 095s.
As mentioned, the Soviet shortcoming wasn't with design, but at her application. And was only solved by buying high precision multi-axis computer controlled milling tools from Japan. China is now one of the world's top producers to such advanced tooling.
By all accounts, modern Chinese SSKs are world class, so they certainly know how to make a quiet sub.
The problem with their nuclear subs is almost certainly reactor related, since that's the only meaningful difference between SSKs and SSNs.
With China fast becoming the world leading civilian nuclear reactor producing nation, that bottleneck should be broken soon, if it hasn't been already.
The problem with their nuclear subs is almost certainly reactor related, since that's the only meaningful difference between SSKs and SSNs.
There is another difference that might be relevant: the typical operating speed of SSKs is much lower.
We know that SSKs operating at a very low speed are almost silent, but do we know about the noise level of chinese (or other nations) SSKs at higher speeds (15 - 20kn) ?
If chinese SSKs have relatively high noise levels at higher speeds this would not be a big problem if they are generally operated at low speeds close to the chinese coast, but it would indicate that building silent and fast submarines is still a problem.
Comparatively speaking, it's child's play to design a hydrodynamic shape that produces minimal noise increases when operating at your typical max range speed figures for SSNs of 20-30kts.
We commonly associate higher speeds with higher noise from our daily experience with car engines. But nuclear subs are far more like electric cars rather than traditional fossil fuel cars.
With electric cars, noise level does not increase much, if at all, with speed increases up to a point. The lion share of increases noise from higher speeds in traditional cars comes from the engine. For an SSN, engine output is pretty much a constant no matter how fast they are going because of the nature of their nuclear reactors.
Comparatively speaking, it's child's play to design a hydrodynamic shape that produces minimal noise increases when operating at your typical max range speed figures for SSNs of 20-30kts.
I always thought that increasing the speed has a big influence on the noise level of a submarine.
A quick search lead me to a very interesting looking article from the mid 90s:
If we believe this article flow noise becomes very important at higher speeds.