09III/09IV (093/094) Nuclear Submarine Thread

by78

General
Their comments are scattered across different forums & media platforms, so I'm not going to bother digging up each one and linking them. One of these individuals goes by the username "星海军事" and although he/she is not necessarily a "big shrimp", their observations have been accurate up to this point.

So a bunch of enthusiasts recycle among themselves a rumor that didn't originate from anybody with a track record. How does this make it a credible rumor?
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
So a bunch of enthusiasts recycle among themselves a rumor that didn't originate from anybody with a track record. How does this make it a credible rumor?

The authors themselves have a decent track record, and so unless their rumors happen to coincide with real-life developments on the basis of chance, it's not unreasonable to assume that they sourced their information from the well-informed. No different than sources like Huitong or Henri K.
 

by78

General
The authors themselves have a decent track record, and so unless their rumors happen to coincide with real-life developments on the basis of chance, it's not unreasonable to assume that they sourced their information from the well-informed. No different than sources like Huitong or Henri K.

Who are the authors, and could you give me specifics as to their track record? What information have they originated that proved to be true?
 

by78

General
High-resolution magazine scans from the recent naval review. These have been posted before, but only in lower resolution.

40421227350_ebf5037fce_k.jpg

28355598318_343aa9bf8d_k.jpg

40421229620_f935116c7f_k.jpg

40421228880_677ad50059_k.jpg
 
Top