055 Large Destroyer Thread II

by78

General
A clearer image of 108, the last ship of the first batch. Image was taken from a video.

52800171021_1784b297f4_k.jpg
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Type 055 really is big vessel and when someone sees it it shows China has reached a critical stage in naval dominance

hope to see more improvement on the restart programme

What I really want to see the improvements of 055 are IEPS and railgun and in much lesser wish is 128 full length 9m UVLS

What are in your mind ?
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Why rail guns? From everything I have seen so far every time a rail gun has been tried it seemed more like an expensive novelty rather than a effective weapon emplacement. It seems that laser CIWS is both more practical and achievable within the near future.

Well because what you have heard possibly from Zumwalt-class destroyer which I understood had many issues with railgun

Chinese railgun could be more successful (well, we are hopeful here)

btw Railgun has many advantages
1. Higher velocity and longer range and better accuracy
2. No cartridge is required, it means reduced the size of the projectiles .. it can carry much more and cheaper
3. No explosive charge, it means safer and cheaper
etc
 

pevade

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well because what you have heard possibly from Zumwalt-class destroyer which I understood had many issues with railgun

Chinese railgun could be more successful (well, we are hopeful here)

btw Railgun has many advantages
1. Higher velocity and longer range and better accuracy
2. No cartridge is required, it means reduced the size of the projectiles .. it can carry much more and cheaper
3. No explosive charge, it means safer and cheaper
etc
Yeah, but you also get all the disadvantages, like increased power requirements, new electrics, and the general unreliability of railguns to fire accurately due to significantly increased "barrel" wear due to how modern high-power railguns work.
 
Top