The problem of this article is this supposed declaration last July. Nobody including PLAN made such declaration, except this article. So it looks like the author of this article fabricated this declaration, put it in the mouth of PLAN, then use this fabrication to "suggest" something or to further some agenda. This is typical propaganda tricks of "make something out of thin air, self-made, self-directed and self-performed drama".LOL I think you missed the question mark in the first picture of the post you quoted, and you didn't read the related article linked Today at 8:14 AM
"...
According to visual documentation, the destroyer may be undergoing the installation of new hardware and may not be operational at this stage.
As opposed to the operational declaration of the ship last July, The photographs from recent months show that, in fact, the construction of the vessel is not complete. ..."
etc.: