054B/new generation frigate

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
Definitely YJ-12, not YJ-83.

Where did you hear that? They look exactly like YJ-83 launchers to me. Here's the new 054B:

Gh5jlVyaYAAL6c-.jpg


Here's the old 054A:

msl_ashm_yj83_p04.jpg


Also reported as such in the NN piece:

Nevertheless the type shares some key commonalities with its predecessor. This includes the 32 cell-H/AKJ-16 VLS and eight YJ-83 antiship missiles in slanted deck launchers amidships.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And on Guancha:

再比如从武备系统上,目前确认054B型护卫舰的垂直发射系统,相比054A型护卫舰没有换;主炮换成了100毫米舰炮;近防武器系统从054A型护卫舰上的左右两舷的两门H/PJ-11型11管30毫米舰炮,改成了一门H/PJ-11型舰炮和一部HQ-10型近防武器系统的组合;甚至连反舰导弹都没有改,还是8枚YJ-83型反舰导弹这种经济适用款。

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
Look at the top view:

What am I supposed to be seeing here? A stitched-together photo of two different ships in two different contexts? You didn't even include any annotations or pixel measurements.

I'm not seeing any evidence at all, much less enough evidence to warrant your "definitely YJ-12."
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Look at the top view:

Besides the fact that the missile cannisters in the comparison photo are of pretty much the same length (with any minute differences being subject to the difference in angles and height of the cameras at which the photos were taken), the photo-quality of the close-up views are much better (and frankly, more authoritative) than the top-down view.

Also, here's what the YJ-12 missile canister actually looks like on a Tughril (054AP) FFG. Beyond the obvious cover design differences between the YJ-83 and YJ-12 missile cannisters, the YJ-12 missile cannisters are visibly much longer than the YJ-83 missile cannisters. There's also the blast deflectors located right behind the YJ-83 missile cannisters on the 054A/AG/Bs, which are completely absent on the 054APs.

Tughril-Class-Frigate-CM-302.png

And here are the same YJ-12 missile cannisters on the post-refit 051B DDG Shenzhen:

Shenzhen_(DDG_167)_in_Shekou,Shenzhen,2018.jpg

This means that the YJ-12 missile cannisters are of the same design across different warship classes. Therefore, the 054B is certainly armed with YJ-83s, not YJ-12s.
 
Last edited:

lcloo

Captain
I don't think that's it. 054A, 052D, and 055's use the 1130. The only main difference it seems between the newer seen 1130s on the 003 and 076 and the "older" ones is the flat-panel array tracking radar replaces the original traditional parabolic radar. View attachment 144229
Most likely FIFO. i.e. First In First Out. PLAN has to use all existing stocks of the older CIWS 1130 before they use latest version. As for aircraft carrier, they are capital ships that deserve priority to have latest version regardless of the warehouse inventory of CIWS 1130.

CIWS 1130 is a common gun platform for many classes of PLAN ships, thus purchasing them in a few dozens in advance of ship building progress is not unlikely.
 

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
Most likely FIFO. i.e. First In First Out. PLAN has to use all existing stocks of the older CIWS 1130 before they use latest version. As for aircraft carrier, they are capital ships that deserve priority to have latest version regardless of the warehouse inventory of CIWS 1130.

CIWS 1130 is a common gun platform for many classes of PLAN ships, thus purchasing them in a few dozens in advance of ship building progress is not unlikely.
Makes sense. Kind of annoyed they couldn't repurpose the leftover old 1130 stocks to land CRAM use or something though. Likely means there isn't that big of a capability/Pk sacrifice anyway compared to the newest version.
 

totenchan

Junior Member
Registered Member
Makes sense. Kind of annoyed they couldn't repurpose the leftover old 1130 stocks to land CRAM use or something though. Likely means there isn't that big of a capability/Pk sacrifice anyway compared to the newest version.
The land CRAM version needs its own search radar on top of the parabolic tracking radar. So still a similar tradeoff.
 

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
Besides the fact that the missile cannisters in the comparison photo are of pretty much the same length (with any minute differences being subject to the small difference in angles at which the photos were taken), the photo-quality of the close-up views are much better (and frankly, more authoritative) than the top-down view.

Also, here's what the YJ-12 missile canister actually looks like on a Tughril (054AP) FFG. Beyond the obvious cover design differences between the YJ-83 and YJ-12 missile cannisters, the YJ-12 missile cannisters are visibly much longer than the YJ-83 missile cannisters. There's also the blast deflectors located right behind the YJ-83 missile cannisters on the 054A/AG/Bs, which are completely absent on the 054APs.

View attachment 144252

And here are the same YJ-12 missile cannisters on the post-refit 051B DDG Shenzhen:

View attachment 144254

This means that the YJ-12 missile cannisters are of the same design across different warship classes. Therefore, the 054B is certainly armed with YJ-83s, not YJ-12s.
The angles of both ships look just about exactly the same. Plus, this is not exactly a small difference:
 

Attachments

  • YJ-83.jpg
    YJ-83.jpg
    590.8 KB · Views: 11
Top