Here's a pic of the Adelaide class:
It's a good upgrade, but probably shouldn't be compared to newer designed all-VLS ships. A better comparison would be the 4th ROKS KDX-II Frigate, Wang Geon with 2 x 32-cel VLS in front. It'd qualify for the 64-SAM count without quad packing.
======================================
If I were to mentally picture a 6,000 ton loaded displacement 054X frigate, it'd have European frigate style layout with:
* Lightweight Main Gun
* 48-cel VLS (in front) with medium-ranged SAM
* 8 x SSM
* 2 x 30mm CIWS
* 1-2 x FL-3000N with short-ranged SAM
* Torpedoes
* ASW Helicopter w/Hanger
To build a ship with VLS cels in forward and aft, I think it'd make more sense to go with larger displacement like KDX-III.
It's a good upgrade, but probably shouldn't be compared to newer designed all-VLS ships. A better comparison would be the 4th ROKS KDX-II Frigate, Wang Geon with 2 x 32-cel VLS in front. It'd qualify for the 64-SAM count without quad packing.
======================================
If I were to mentally picture a 6,000 ton loaded displacement 054X frigate, it'd have European frigate style layout with:
* Lightweight Main Gun
* 48-cel VLS (in front) with medium-ranged SAM
* 8 x SSM
* 2 x 30mm CIWS
* 1-2 x FL-3000N with short-ranged SAM
* Torpedoes
* ASW Helicopter w/Hanger
To build a ship with VLS cels in forward and aft, I think it'd make more sense to go with larger displacement like KDX-III.
Last edited: