I don’t think it is as simple as just a software patch.Another thing is that both has the potential to use their SAMs as antiship missiles of convenience. To enable that capability it would only take software addition. If used this manner, the HQ-9 has as much warhead as a YJ-83 with 165kg warhead and that should really hurt. The HQ-16 has 70kg which is no slouch, but there is fewer of them and up against a bigger hull. As the PLAN has not officially confirmed such capability, we can leave these out for now.
1. We don’t even know if the guidance system is programmable or if it’s all ASIC.
2. The proximity fuse is ill suited against surface ships. The frag warhead can damage electronics and kill sailors on deck, but will not be as damaging as a direct impact weapon. For that they need a contact fuse. Therefore, a hw change.
3. The radar on the missile needs to support surface attack mode. A near stationary target will have different radar echo properties than a moving target (think of doppler). This goes back to 1. I suspect also a radar circuitry upgrade would be necessary since at least some of the processing would be analog.