052C/052D Class Destroyers

by78

by78

General
Ship traffic... All images are high-resolution.

48152761316_ce404b7de2_o.jpg

48152766491_c46c4d2eaa_o.jpg

48152850462_5f9cd0762b_o.jpg

48152850557_6a1a3055a5_o.jpg

48152851777_825eac99cb_o.jpg
 
G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Well the Type 052D has like half the gas turbine engines of the 055 but more than half the VLS cells.
The main disadvantage is the amount of crew per ship but manpower is not exactly an issue China has.
 
T

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
gelgoog said:
Well the Type 052D has like half the gas turbine engines of the 055 but more than half the VLS cells.
The main disadvantage is the amount of crew per ship but manpower is not exactly an issue China has.
Click to expand...

Manpower is starting to become an issue, or the PLA in general won't be making such slick, highly budgeted recruitment ads. With ships becoming more technologically complex, you are going to have higher requirements in technical literacy and that can filter your recruitment prospects. Over time, wages are going to be higher, so yes, overall running costs does matter, and you may get a better bang of the buck with the Type 055. Nowadays, for the rest of the world modern frigates maybe gaining in size but their crew complement maybe decreasing.
 
T

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
gelgoog said:
Well the Type 052D has like half the gas turbine engines of the 055 but more than half the VLS cells.
The main disadvantage is the amount of crew per ship but manpower is not exactly an issue China has.
Click to expand...

That's the reason why they should have included 128 silos in the VLS of the type 055 destroyer. Now they can only increase the # of silos in the type 055A.
 
T

Tetrach

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well it is still the main element with the radar systems. obviously, the the number is one thing, but there is also the diameter which has to be taken into account.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top