Different. I personally think Chinese carriers will grow well past the size of US carriers. US carriers didn't grow beyond 100,000 tonnes not because of tactical considerations. It was to conform with the limits of the Panama Channel. Growing carriers beyond 100,000 tonnes would be an easy shortcut for China to match USN's per carrier sortie numbers. I think the 004 will be bigger than the Fujian. There is no point in further complicating deck and hangar operations by cramming more aircraft when you can just build a bigger ship.Do you guys think the nuclear carrier will by same dimension as Fujian or different?
Do you guys think the nuclear carrier will by same dimension as Fujian or different?
For the 2nd time in a week, Jiangnan Changxing shipyard, which is building China's 1st conventionally-powered CATOBAR aircraft carrier, releases an illustration of what it could be the Navy's next nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Chinese..
@ACuriousPLAFan bro. this is second time. another solid hint ?
The J-35 is also missing a rudder which is weird how someone would just miss to draw that which is why i believe it might be some AI assisted type of artCan you please make sure to post the original image as an attachment as well instead of just as a link?
View attachment 110636
====
Anyway, I think these artworks are obviously not particularly high effort, and the depiction of configuration and details may or may not have certain bearing to the final actual arrangement of the eventual 004/X CVN.
The configuration of the "CVN" between the two angles does seem to have a degree of consistency between them like smaller island, placement of island, overall configuration.
It looks like the elevator placement is ala Ford (two starboard in front of the rear placed island, and one in the aft/port location).
But that sort of configuration is also something that many fan artists have made and also something that many of us have surmised as a reasonable and likely configuration of the 004/X CVN, so this doesn't necessarily mean anything. Interesting nevertheless.
The thing is: Both Dalian and Jiangnan have proven themselves to be capable of building proper aircraft carriers (a CATOBAR supercarrier at that for the later).
For the 2nd time in a week, Jiangnan Changxing shipyard, which is building China's 1st conventionally-powered CATOBAR aircraft carrier, releases an illustration of what it could be the Navy's next nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Chinese..
@ACuriousPLAFan bro. this is second time. another solid hint ?
The thing is: Both Dalian and Jiangnan have proven themselves to be capable of building proper aircraft carriers (a CATOBAR supercarrier at that for the later).
Coupled with news from previous months and years, I believe there already is 100% confidence that Jiangnan is capable of building a CVN in the coming years. Dalian, meanwhile, I'd say 70-80%.
That aside, how sure are we that China's 4th carrier, i.e. CV-19 will be nuclear-powered CVN i.e. 004, instead of the conventionally-powered CV i.e. 003/003A/sister ship of Fujian?
This is because all the PLAN CVN illustrations that we have seen so far have the pennant number of 20, not 19.
I had the same impression too, it took me quite some time to look again and again. The canted tail is there, it is just the angle that made it looked like just a thin white line.The J-35 is also missing a rudder which is weird how someone would just miss to draw that which is why i believe it might be some AI assisted type of art
The thing is: Both Dalian and Jiangnan have proven themselves to be capable of building proper aircraft carriers (a CATOBAR supercarrier at that for the later).
Coupled with news from previous months and years, I believe there already is 100% confidence that Jiangnan is capable of building a CVN in the coming years. Dalian, meanwhile, I'd say 70-80%.
That aside, how sure are we that China's 4th carrier, i.e. CV-19 will be nuclear-powered CVN i.e. 004, instead of the conventionally-powered CV i.e. 003/003A/sister ship of Fujian?
This is because all the PLAN CVN illustrations that we have seen so far have the pennant number of 20, not 19.