Engineer
Major
No they wouldn't because that sort of design isn't sane and wouldn't be compatible with existing carriers. "Long start up time" isn't a valid argument here because it takes just as long to load up a carrier with supplies.If another conventional powered CATOBAR was built I think it would come with gas turbine engines. The long startup times of steam turbines make them poorly suited for modern warfare.
Steam catapult would have just been icing on the cake. The Kuznetsov class has no catapults but is steam driven nonetheless. The fact is, steam propulsion has been the intention all along. It is the sane solution for ship of such size.The fact the Type 003 comes with the steam turbines is probably more of a legacy trait due to it being originally designed to use steam catapults which would use steam generated from the boilers more than anything else.
I agree that the next carrier to be built will likely be nuclear and they won't be building more conventional carriers. But I think this isn't necessarily a good idea for China in the short term. Since conventional carriers are typically cheaper to operate and China needs to get more experience with carrier ops, having at least some conventional carriers would likely be a good idea.
UK just doesn't have the expertise to build and maintain steam propulsion anymore. UK's carriers are examples of what not to do rather than something to be emulated.China have long had 28 MW gas turbines. Supposedly they now also have 40 MW gas turbines.
The Queen Elizabeth class uses two 36 MW gas turbines.
Type 003 has 30% more displacement than the Queen Elizabeth class. I think this would not be difficult to achieve with existing Chinese technology and equipment.
China faces no such constrains. For historical reasons, China kept steam ships around far longer than Western navies. Not only that, China made a conscious decision to build the odd ball DDG 167 in the 90's. There is no question that China would continue with steam propulsion.
Except they don't.The gas turbines are more efficient than a boiler and steam turbine configuration. So it would also increase the range of the carrier. Plus the gas turbine is way more compact which would increase the internal space of the carrier.