J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VI

Status
Not open for further replies.

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
But that was clear since I would say years ... and even more since the first images came out already.

Lots of various groups liked to claim otherwise and now the evidence is clear enough even for them to see. Many in these groups also like to claim J-20 is an interceptor or underpowered, or unstealthy. These are also as unlikely to be true and built on similarly shoddy speculation or non-existent evidence.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Lots of various groups liked to claim otherwise and now the evidence is clear enough even for them to see. Many in these groups also like to claim J-20 is an interceptor or underpowered, or unstealthy. These are also as unlikely to be true and built on similarly shoddy speculation or non-existent evidence.

To put it mildly:
not "Lots of various groups" but only a few ignorant IDIOTS (at the Key-Forum, PDF, ...) !!!

Interesting is also that there is yet another J-20A out with a slightly modified "Raptor-scheme".
 
Last edited:

Hyperwarp

Captain
To put it mildly:
not "Lots of various groups" but only a few ignorant IDIOTS (at the Key-Forum, PDF, ...) !!!


Interesting is also that there is yet another J-20A out with a slightly modified "Raptor-scheme".

I remember you had to go through a lot personal attacks at Key-Forum. I re-checked your original estimate of 20.35 m (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Considering the J-20 in that sat pic is the demonstrator 2001/2002 (which shorter than the production version), I did some adjustments based on this new J-20 + J-16 pic and you were off only by 20 cm at most 30 cm. :eek: That is very impressive and hats-off to you.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
The issue is not that I want to be correct, but that I don't like stupid arguments or ignorance and esp. when evidence is given by measurements, calculations and those are bashed as wrong since they are "eyeballing" what they even openly admit.

The best example of such idiocy is located at the PDF, who really came up with the idea to assume that this type behind is no Flanker or that Sukhoi or SAC secretly enlarged the Su-30MKK/J-16's span.

Anyway ... I would love to see '2021' again.

Deino
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
I remember you had to go through a lot personal attacks at Key-Forum. I re-checked your original estimate of 20.35 m (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Considering the J-20 in that sat pic is the demonstrator 2001/2002 (which shorter than the production version), I did some adjustments based on this new J-20 + J-16 pic and you were off only by 20 cm at most 30 cm. :eek: That is very impressive and hats-off to you.
The personal sniping hasn't stopped either. Just had a few rounds of that at Keypub with a certain smug someone who likes to misrepresent people and seems to think his passive aggression is somehow clever and impressive.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Oh yes I know him ... my his logic the H-6K are painted white and ...

A troll, nothing more than a troll.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
What's going on here ? The two units on the right have white nose cones the two on the left have black?

Someone explain ??

JUmfcVO.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top