Maritime strike, plus simulator...
(2048 x 1132)
(2048 x 1140)
Why maritime strike? Isn't this just the regular YJ-91 ARM and as such it is SEAD?
Maritime strike, plus simulator...
(2048 x 1132)
(2048 x 1140)
A military exhibit in Yinchuan recently received a J-10S as a new exhibit. This goes to show that twin-seaters were heavily used due to a low number of advanced trainers in the early 2000s.
It carries one YJ-91 for SEAD.Besides,it also carries one PL-12( under the right wing),it is relatively rare to see such a dual purpose paload on a PLAAF jet.Why maritime strike? Isn't this just the regular YJ-91 ARM and as such it is SEAD?
It carries one YJ-91 for SEAD.Besides,it also carries one PL-12( under the right wing),it is relatively rare to see such a dual purpose paload on a PLAAF jet.
That the J-10A performance against the JAS-39 Gripen (which the post did not deign to provide the serial number as to make the lives of people who are not familiar with how the Chinese translate English sounding names easier) in the subsequent 2017-2018 air exercise with Thailand had increased and also lays the theory that the Thai pilots did not push the Gripen to its full capability during both exercises in order to not fully disclose NATO training doctrines and/or technical capabilities.What does it says?