Miscellaneous News

FairAndUnbiased

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
jwnz said:
The US has 9 CSGs, losing 2 carriers won't spell the end of it. Once the US is backed into a corner, do you think they would react rationally considering the internal political pressure. That's the dangerous bit hard to predict and plan for.
Click to expand...
Typical deployment is 3 CBGs globally (25% deployment). 6 is their short term surge capability which was seen during Desert Storm.

Note that in 1991 their navy was much larger with 16x CBGs total: 9x conventional (1x MDWY, 4x FRSTL, 4x KT HWK), 7x CVN (1x ENT , 6x NMTZ ).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

00X/004 future nuclear CATOBAR carrier thread

I am of the opinion, articulated here previously, that China should produce a further three conventional Fujian-type carriers at short (3 year) intervals, in order to arrive at six operating carriers at relatively low cost by 2035, which is not to say that I think China will do this. I agree...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
 
J

jwnz

Junior Member
Registered Member
ansy1968 said:
My favorite Journalist (PEPE ESCOBAR) explain it so well, RESPECT!!!! may your tribe increase.:)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1.2K views12 hours ago
Click to expand...
This is the best scenario for China and the world. Once the US is economically broken and spent, her military will crumble without the PLA firing a single shoot.
 
J

jwnz

Junior Member
Registered Member
FairAndUnbiased said:
Typical deployment is 3 CBGs globally (25% deployment). 6 is their short term surge capability which was seen during Desert Storm.

Note that in 1991 their navy was much larger with 16x CBGs total: 9x conventional (1x MDWY, 4x FRSTL, 4x KT HWK), 7x CVN (1x ENT , 6x NMTZ ).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

00X/004 future nuclear CATOBAR carrier thread

I am of the opinion, articulated here previously, that China should produce a further three conventional Fujian-type carriers at short (3 year) intervals, in order to arrive at six operating carriers at relatively low cost by 2035, which is not to say that I think China will do this. I agree...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
Click to expand...
I would imagine if the US decides to get involved, it will get more than 3 CSGs ready for deployment. It would be foolish for the US to start a hot war with China without 6 or more CSGs in combat ready status.
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
jwnz said:
This is the best scenario for China and the world. Once the US is economically broken and spent, her military will crumble without the PLA firing a single shoot.
Click to expand...
The reason for the Collective West desperation and anxiety.:) the writing is on the wall and they thought it was a graffiti that can be wash away....lol
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
jwnz said:
I would imagine if the US decides to get involved, it will get more than 3 CSGs ready for deployment. It would be foolish for the US to start a hot war with China without 6 or more CSGs in combat ready status.
Click to expand...
And that will contradict their 2025 schedule, even with massive increase in defense budget, there are a lack of man power to manned them and industrial capacity to produce more. So the only solution is for her Vassals to sacrifice themselves for Captain America and will be compensated with prominent Movie billing....lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top