At this point, either would be an improvement.Besides, did you want it to be a public 2% or they can do it unannounced like you said before? If they don't announce it, how do you know if it has or hasn't been done?
Your post still reads like a fervent believer completely unwilling to question the infallibility of his god. My intelligence isn't the issue here, I'm perfectly willing to admit the CPC is teeming with people far smarter than I am. The issue is your blind faith. Is there anything the CPC could ever do that might once make you think "hmm... maybe it would have been better if they did x instead of y."And your post reads like foolishly arrogant person demanding that his will be recognized over the analyses of experts that have classified knowledge that he doesn't and who have a resounding track record of success which he doesn't. Usually, when one finds himself in this situation, it is due to his simple mind misrecognizing itself as a genius.
Fine. Who is? Or does no one on Earth get to question your god?They're not mutually exclusive but you are by no means equipped with the knowledge to make that determination.
Sure, the CPC knows better than we do. But knowing and having the political will to act on that knowledge are two different things.There is a CCP, and they know more classified information than we do and they have a track record of success.
You say there is "a CCP", which one? Xi's CCP is very different from Hu's CCP. Before Xi came along and cleaned out the rot and corruption, would you have held the prior CCP in the esteem you hold the present one?
The only justification for the wholly unquestioning obedience you espouse is if China is in severe danger. If China were in that kind of danger, it should spend like it.