Well, I'll be... we finally found something you don't know.
Was about to say that seems like the first seriously questionable thing I've heard him say.
@Patchwork_Chimera
Sure China hasn't been on LoW up to now, due to a combination of having a small silo based force, liquid fueled missiles, and lacking the infrastructure, but aren't all indications that they're moving to adopt that in tandem with the expansion?
Are you saying China would adopt a large silo-based force but NOT LoW? And compensate for that with a large number of decoy silos? Even then that doesn't provide second strike because the US has more than enough warheads to strike all the silos. I see basically 0 reason not to adopt it if your missiles are solid fueled, and you have the infrastructure.
I think what they should do, if building enough DF-41/45s to fill all of them is a problem, is fill a portion with smaller/easier to produce missiles, whether something like the DF-31AG or the Midgetman that can only carry 1 warhead, that I'd be okay with.