Could it be the 4th prototype with TVC nozzles, while the one from few days ago (said to be the fifth overall) is the 2nd with the trench nozzles, so first and fifth with trench nozzles, and second, third, fourth and sixth with TVC nozzles?
Well, it appears the screenshots show DSI intakes coupled with the trench nozzles, so it's either the claimed 5th airframe, or maybe the first prototype modified with DSI intakes.There were videos from David Wang PLA on the day the 5th prototype news came out and those videos showed J-36 with 2DTVC nozzles, are those old videos or is it something new?
Can I be given a explanation why people think this is not 2D TVC engines? To me they look like they are like 2D TVC engines.So, is this real or not? There seem to be videos of both a 2D TVC prototype and a prototype with what appears to be SERNs along with this picture
View attachment 178870
Looks like the bottom extends all the way to the tail, the cutout on for the 2D TVC are quite long and would be probably appear brighter (or quite obviously seen) in this angle than it appears to be here.Can I be given a explanation why people think this is not 2D TVC engines? To me they look like they are like 2D TVC engines.
In red I drew what appears to me to be the tail booms, while in orange is what appears to me as the 2d nozzle cutout. The cutout at least to me is not appearing to be visible because of the angle/perspective and the long zoom. I placed my model with the 2D TVC nozzles at a similar angle and as you can see the cutout is not as obvious as you would expect at this angle.Looks like the bottom extends all the way to the tail, the cutout on for the 2D TVC are quite long and would be probably appear brighter (or quite obviously seen) in this angle than it appears to be here.



The original post by the author has been removed by the platform just now.
…