Miscellaneous News

Thecore

Junior Member
Registered Member
Indians are r*tarded. They started a massive propaganda wave against China during and after Galwan clashes. Which Western media eagerly lapped up because China is infinitely more capable than India, and thus a challenge to their world order.

Meanwhile the Chinese government played down the clashes because they didn't want to instigate their citizens against Indians.

Yet these Indians still think the Chinese government deliberately smears India when the only part China played was making affordable electronics for Indians to expose their downcomings to the world.

Indian government & Modi media needs to besmirch China constantly because China exposes how inept India's government has been the last three decades. China has nothing positive to gain by comparing itself to India.

Chinese citizens shit on Indians because they, like many in the world, have been exposed to the failures of Indian society, and in response to Indian propaganda against China.

The worst part of this is that half of the Indian population still isn't on the internet. There will be so much more Indian netizens drowning out other voices as Indians colonize the internet. Pakistani netizens have experienced this when so much of their online areas have been invaded by Hindutvas, spreading their propaganda.
Mark my words, western governments will copy China and make a great firewall themselves. Only with the explicit purpose to block out Indians.
 

Some1Guy

Junior Member
Registered Member
Mark my words, western governments will copy China and make a great firewall themselves. Only with the explicit purpose to block out Indians.
Couldn't they just you know block Indians from their social media platforms using geolocation based on ip since they own those social media platforms. That would get rid of like 99% of the problem.
 

4Tran

Junior Member
Registered Member
The issue here is that Sarah Paine believes China is doomed because it is a continental power and subject to the disadvantages of being a continental power. However, all or almost all the characteristics described in the video show that China is closer to being a maritime power than the continental power Sarah Paine claims.

For example, in the video she states that the decision to remain a continental power stems from China having the Silk Road through Central Asia, highlighting the consistency of land-based communication projects and lines, forgetting the fact that China has its own Maritime Silk Road, while the land route is an alternative to the maritime route. She believes China is preferentially focusing on the land route, highlighting the disadvantage of China still being and continuing to be a continental power.
She looked at a country that builds 70% of the world's shipping, is having the fastest peacetime naval buildup in history, that does most of the trade by sea, and is the largest trading partner of three quarters of the countries in the world, and concludes, "Yup, that's what a non-Maritime Power looks like." I think that Paine might be a bit of an idiot.
 

Thecore

Junior Member
Registered Member
Couldn't they just you know block Indians from their social media platforms using geolocation based on ip since they own those social media platforms. That would get rid of like 99% of the problem.
Financially it doesn’t even make sense for social media companies to try to enter the Indian market since each one of them has such low spending power, advertisers don’t even want to bother spending for eyeballs in that country, no matter how many of them they are.

For example if you somehow trick YouTube that you’re located in India, the premium monthly subscription is way lower. At some point it won’t even be worth the bandwidth costs. Too much effort for too little return, not to mention their extreme protectionist trade policies.

This concept also applies to Indians as inbound tourists. Who wants an Indian tourist who is unhygienic, rude and entitled, who haggles to the death for every penny and spends 10X less during their trip vs a Chinese tourist?
 

Racek49

Junior Member
Registered Member
From France, Germany, to the Soviet Union, traditional land powers failed to convert into sea powers—not because they didn't want to, but because they were under constant pressure from nearby sea powers. When so-called experts believe this is deserved, we can instead observe the emergence of something that breaks with tradition.
Well, I certainly don't think the USSR wasn't a naval power. It had the second largest navy in the world, pretty broadly speaking. It was a formidable opponent to the US.
 

PandaAI

Junior Member
Registered Member
Financially it doesn’t even make sense for social media companies to try to enter the Indian market since each one of them has such low spending power, advertisers don’t even want to bother spending for eyeballs in that country, no matter how many of them they are.

For example if you somehow trick YouTube that you’re located in India, the premium monthly subscription is way lower. At some point it won’t even be worth the bandwidth costs. Too much effort for too little return, not to mention their extreme protectionist trade policies.

This concept also applies to Indians as inbound tourists. Who wants an Indian tourist who is unhygienic, rude and entitled, who haggles to the death for every penny and spends 10X less during their trip vs a Chinese tourist?

YouTube CEO is an Indian. Google CEO is an Indian. Everytime you search about China on YouTube, the first videos that come up are Indian channels talking about China. It’s not Western channels and certainly not Chinese channels. The Indians working on these companies have set the algorithm to prop up Indian channels. YouTube has been completely ruined by these people. The Western elites keep hiring them and giving them important positions in corporations and government. West is in terminal decline and Indians are accelerating it.
 
Top