Miscellaneous News

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
No, logistics kills. It's 5000km from the Caspian coast to where oil is needed in china. And in general, Russian logistics sAck. I remember watching Thamoas Sowell, famous American economist, pointing to this. It's just so expensive and time consuming to transport goods from one part of Russia to another.
Obama is more famous than Thamoas Sowell and he claimed Russian economy was in tatters but got Trump. I even think Obama conduct hastened Royal Intervention in Africa. These logistics are routinely published in Arabic and who are using it most often.

China-Europe trade increased 50% on Russia railway/Road routes after this Iran conflict. Europeans cannot refuse Chinese products even on Russian logistics. and the second tweet is 20 days to UK port from China and that was October.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 
Last edited:

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
5X4dgUF.png


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

XACsUtX.png
I mean, Trump is also sabotaging American astrophysics, so it's even I guess.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

Like I've said, the white supremacist narrative is all about claiming white people's lives are better than non-white people. Whites need to do that because they want to control everything. The West tried it through force and that eventually failed because the world revolted. That's why today they have to get control by claiming their cultural values are better therefore everyone should embrace Western culture in order to have better lives. Problem is Western culture is also racist hence white supremacist. Why in the hell would everyone else believe the West cares about other's well-being when they got to power through racist policies? Because they failed in using force, they've been relegated into trying to control the world by trying to make everyone value the same things they do because they control what they see as of value. The West hates how China doesn't value the same entertainment as they do. They do partially because of the dominance of the West but not enough for them to control the Chinese, because they have their own cultural values, to deny it from them in order to get concessions. Look at how Western movies once popular in China are not now but a Chinese movie like Ne Zha 2 is the biggest animated movie in the history of the world. It's not because Chinese aren't watching movies anymore as the reason why Western movies aren't as successful.

China is not communist and it's not capitalist. Here the attempt is to spin Chinese successes is because of capitalism. The West is coping and spinning China's successes are because of capitalism. If China's capitalist, why does the West like to vilify China as communist still. That's where they're in denial. They still want to control China. That's where white supremacy comes in because all they care about is making sure white people have everything where they're on top. They hate China because there non-whites are having it better than they have it. That's not all true but it just shows how they don't want any Chinese no matter how less than they have to live better lives than any white person. So they aren't okay even when they say they want everyone to embrace their cultural values so everyone could have a better life. All white people don't have better lives because what are skinheads? They're white people who don't live up to the standards of white supremacy and are angry at seeing any non-white having better a better life than they do. The only way they can be happy is when all white people live better lives than any non-white person.

The West has to spin white supremacists as a fringe group within whites. The philosophy of white supremacy goes beyond just poor white trash. The argument over AI and technology with China is about white supremacy. What is development and advancement in technology all about? At it's core it's about making life and doing things easier. Whites don't like technology especially in the hands of none-white people because it prevents dependency on white people therefore they don't have control. That's why you see in the West they have a love/hate relationship with technology. To them AI is ultimately Skynet. Skynet is the nightmare where they lose control over their own lives. They certainly don't want a non-white to have it where they see it not value their lives even more.

Even white supremacy is not the endgame with them. It's like the movie Highlander when in the end, there can only be one. Everyone else is after the same thing. Anyone they don't control is a threat to them. Because the West is losing control over the world, they're blaming and going after one another. China just passed a law preventing anyone losing their jobs from AI. I've already seen Westerner experts in the tech field claiming that's a horrible idea. Western billionaires are sociopaths as studies say rich people have the same sociopathic tendencies as serial killers. Of course they don't care about others when they're not in control or interfere with what they want.

They hate China not because China is bad for everyone. It's because China is bad for them. Like the saying goes... There's no honor among thieves. Why? Because ultimately all thieves are motivated by selfishness. If you only think about yourself, how can you possibly think about anyone else? Hence why you can't trust the West when they claim they care for anyone else.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Trump doesn't like Iran's response.

China is not overconfident. It's the US regime that's hopelessly stuck in the Iran war quagmire.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
OslXMbs.jpg
This guy knows about Alex's kill line meme but throughout the whole article he is not able to offer up any arguments why it's not valid. Best he could do is:
This is, of course, false. Violent crime rates in the United States are the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in decades, the country
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
unmatched geopolitical and financial power and its economy remains vibrant and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
than China’s.

It's not just me, in the guy's twitter thread other people have also noticed it and are calling him out on this:

It's why Alex's observations in Seattle are so impactful. You can character assassinate him as much as you like but no one has yet been able to offer any rebuttal to what he's saying.
 
Last edited:

_killuminati_

Captain
Registered Member
or Iran could transport the oil to Kazak through the Caspian sea. From distance wise, Kazak is closer to Iran than Russia.

A Kazakhstan–China oil pipeline also exist.

Another option is the Turkmenistan–China gas pipeline. Iran could transport its oil by road to Turkmen
Afaik both the Russian and Kazakh pipelines already operate at full or near full capacity, leaving no room for Irani oil. iirc, Kazakhstan is planning to expand it's current capacity for it's own oil right now. So, for Iran to get to China via land would require laying another pipeline. And, Kazakhstan has close ties with Israel..
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Trojan horse for Central Asia?

Also, wouldn't the intermediary countries prefer to export more of it's own rather than Iran's? I see no way for Iran via land unless it's through the Himalayas which is just impractical if not impossible.
Trump does not repeat things unless there is lobby.
I have been posting often about this dispute. Just change in language from before and after Trump the dates are before Operation Sindoor.
Indian lobby in Washington is significantly larger than the Pakistani, and more embedded in the government. They even curry-trapped Vance.
 

Thecore

Junior Member
Registered Member
Indian lobby in Washington is significantly larger than the Pakistani, and more embedded in the government. They even curry-trapped Vance.
Thing is, back when JD married Usha, Indians had very little reputation and a low profile amongst Americans other than being quirky Apu from the Simpsons, ie. 7-Eleven clerks or on the high end, doctors with funny names. Being a hillbilly white trash from the Ozarks, at the time, JD probably thought he was being "worldly" and was "marrying up" into Usha's family. After all, they represented the white collar "high status" and international aspect of Indian reputation that was still acceptable at the time in the US.

However, due to Mukesh Ambani deciding to essentially make internet access almost free and readily available for the entire population of India, American internet users have been subjected to the real "bobs and vagene" and conceited nature of Indians. Many have also experienced this in real life with the huge increase in H1B immigration to the US and near population replacing immigration to Canada. In additon, the complete abject poverty, below third world filth of what Indian cities look like have been made up close and clear to see with the advent of smart phone video capture and readily accessible online video tourism to see what India really is like now. Not to mention the embarrassing and anger inducing behavior of high profile political Indians like Kash Patel being a complete clown and Vivek telling white Americans that they are stupid compared to Indians when all an American has to do is look at their own surroundings and then look at videos of what India is like.

In the eyes of Americans and the west, this has really dropped the reputation of Indian people to rock bottom. At this point, being married to an Indian is a HUGE albatross around JD's neck if he ever has more political ambitions.
 
Last edited:

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
Thing is, back when JD married Usha, Indians had very little reputation and a low profile amongst Americans other than being quirky Apu from the Simpsons, ie. 7-Eleven clerks or on the high end, doctors with funny names. Being a hillbilly white trash from the Ozarks, at the time, JD probably thought he was being "worldly" and was "marrying up" into Usha's family, After all, they represented the white collar "high status" and international aspect of Indian reputation that was still acceptable at the time in the US.

However, due to the fact Mukesh Ambani decided to essentially make internet access almost free and readily available for the entire population of India, American internet users have been subjected to the real "bobs and vagene" and conceited nature of Indians. Many have also experienced this in real life with the huge increase in H1B immigration to the US and near population replacing immigration to Canada. In additon, the complete abject poverty, below third world filth of what Indian cities look like have been made up close and clear to see with the advent of smart phone video capture and readily accessible online video tourism to see what India really is like now. Not to mention the embarrassing and anger inducing behavior of high profile political Indians like Kash Patel being a complete clown and Vivek telling white Americans that they are stupid compared to Indians when all an American has to do is look at their own surroundings and then look at videos of what India is like.

In the eyes of Americans and the west, this has really dropped the reputation of Indian people to rock bottom. At this point, being married to an Indian is a HUGE albatross around JD's neck if he ever has more political ambitions.
I'm actually surprised this isn't talked about more.

America keeps whining about China doing this and that. Meanwhile they literally elected Indians born in India to political positions. Not to mention these guys are part of the massive Indian lobby that are doing stuff clearly in favor of their home country.

I get America being xenophobic to outsiders but at least show some damn consistency. At least India does that consistently by screwing over ALL foreign companies than enter it.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

Interesting that there's not a "pure" Korean in this discussion. It's like in Japan where you can be fully Japanese by blood but if you were born in the US, you're not a "real" Japanese to the people of Japan. They have all sorts of names for these people indicative of the class culture in Japan. It's like some Koreans find out they're really Chinese. Like with Johnny Somali's association with Hank Yoo. Koreans don't like him because of it so they claim he's Chinese as an excuse to disassociate him with Koreans. Are you really getting a true picture from some of these people when they're not actually "Korean"? This channel is coming out of South Korea, so why couldn't they find one?

There are lot of different dynamics going on so if even Southeast Asian women think they're moving up socially especially because one marries a white, why do they complain about what the Koreans looking down at "SEAblings" when it comes from the same logic? I was at someone's house where they were celebrating a man's birthday who was a high ranking diplomat of the Marcos regime in the Philippines. While there I was browsing through the books he had on the shelf and one I came across was on how glorious the Philippines was pointing out that Filipino women were one of most beautiful women of the world because of how they had European blood from race-mixing with them. But I hear how Filipinos think they don't get respect from other Asians. Isn't that the same South Korean attitude when you think they're some of the most beautiful women of the world over everyone else except maybe whites?

Nationalism is an ugly thing and Asia is rife with it. And of course you better believe that the West stirred that up because they wanted everyone hating each other except for them. That's how they have control when everyone goes to them and avoids everyone else. Ironic because all of them come from countries that hate China because of communism and yet Asian cultures are just as authoritarian as communists regardless if they're even democracies now hence why they were human-rights violating police states before they were democracies. That's why I laugh at Asian countries that bring up human rights in China when they're just as authoritarian minded as China is? It's just like the West bringing human rights in China. It's disingenuous especially since every country they colonized in the world, they never gave democracy. It's like with Hong Kong. The British didn't think the people of Hong Kong could handle democracy so they never gave it under their 156 year rule over it. But today everyone acts like China took away the democracy the British never gave. If any one ignores that fact and continue with the lie, they have no principles which is the foundation of believing you have any ounce of believing you care for others... which they don't. If anyone did, I would have respect for that person but there isn't because all of them care about "white attention" as their only motivation therefore they cannot be trusted.
 
Top