J-15 carrier fighter thread

Axyan

New Member
Registered Member
Hi everyone, I’m new here and have a question I’ve been wondering about. Generally, we understand our carrier-based aircraft fleet as a 'high-low' mix: the J-35 stealth fighter focuses on air superiority, while the J-15T handles strike missions (multi-role). If that’s the case, shouldn't the J-15T follow the example of the J-16 or F/A-18F by using a twin-seat layout with a Weapon Systems Officer (WSO) to maximize combat effectiveness? Why is the J-15 series still primarily single-seat, with the twin-seat version used only as a trainer?
 

Confusionism

Junior Member
Registered Member
That sucks. The reason aircraft have ejection seats is that pilots are valuable. May he rest in peace.
This is a standard practice in political propaganda; usually, when a pilot loses his life due to an unsuccessful ejection, it is often portrayed as an act to save the aircraft. In reality, flight training covers the specific situations in which ejection is mandatory, and pilot is not required to try to save the aircraft at all costs. This is because even attempting to save the aircraft requires certain conditions to be met, so a pilot is not expected to make such pointless efforts.

However, political officials in charge of publicity rarely provide a complete account of the actual situation, due to both confidentiality concerns and political motives: it looks better to portray a pilot as having sacrificed his life to save the aircraft than to admit he died because of a mechanical failure.
 

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
Heroic pilot aside, did the incident involve a carrier? What was the "emergency"?

The official news tends to paint such stories in a romantic light and lots aren't published in the first place. But one should expect the not-so-rosy things in the PLA
AL-31FN again, I guess
 
Top