China's Space Program Thread II

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
Finally, Xinhua News Agency has a report & video on this... :rolleyes:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It mentions the recovery failure was a result of "an abnormal combustion" (aka 异常燃烧). Part of report as follows: (translated)
This mission also conducted a recovery test of the first-stage rocket. However, an abnormal combustion occurred during the process, preventing a soft landing on the recovery pad. The recovery test failed, and the specific cause is currently under further analysis and investigation.

Although this mission did not achieve the preset goal of recovering the first stage of the rocket, it tested the correctness and rationality of the overall testing, launch, and flight plan of the Zhuque-3 carrier rocket, as well as the compatibility of system interfaces. It also acquired key engineering data under the rocket's actual flight conditions, laying an important foundation for subsequent launch services and the reliable recovery and reuse of sub-stages.

It is reported that the research and development team will conduct a comprehensive review and technical close loop of the test process as soon as possible, make every effort to identify the cause of the failure, continuously optimize the recovery plan, and continue to promote reusability verification in subsequent missions.
 

lpfPRC

Just Hatched
Registered Member
你从哪儿得到的消息?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
That's not the current version, that's the full version. The rocket used in this experiment has a non recovery capacity of 11.8 tons and a recovery capacity of 8 tons. In the future, TQ-12A and TQ-15A will be changed to TQ-12B and TQ-15B to achieve the goals you mentioned.
 

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Based on a frame from a Landspeace promotional video, It's speculated that To reduce the range of the first stage, the ZQ-3 first-stage rocket shuts down at a higher altitude, resulting in a steeper reentry and earlier ignition and deceleration. ZQ-3’s landing ignition started in the supersonic/transonic speed range, rather than the F9's Mach 0.7 to 0.9.
 
Last edited:

SCE2Aux

New Member
Registered Member
One thing I've been wondering about Landspace, insofar as their launching from Jiuquan, is the issue of downrange landing locations. If one launches from the coast, then a droneship can be positioned downrange on the groundtrack of whatever inclination they happen to be launching to that day. But for inland missions there would presumably be a need for a decent number of landing pads, otherwise you'd be incurring a significant payload penalty by forcing the second stage to fly a significant dogleg trajectory.

This is a moot point if they intend to fly most of their missions out of Wenchang, but nevertheless, are there plans for multiple ground-based pads for Jiuquan that anyone is aware of?
 
Top