I cannot wait to see if Landspace is successful in building a reusable rocket. If they can succeed and scale their cadence I think Landspace could dominate the Chinese launch industry. China has a bunch of launch start-ups right now, but if Landspace gets ahead it will be hard for them to offer something competitive.
I don't really think it does raise an important point at all. That post is basically saying if the US didn't have the best rocket it wouldn't be a leader. SpaceX dominates for a reason, they mastered reusability and scaled launch cadence consistently. This allowed them to corner the global market. LandSpace successfully landing a single rocket isn't going to change SpaceX dominance or trajectory.
Outside of that, the US has Blue Origin and Rocket Lab both looking to launch reusable launch vehicles shortly. New Glenn is getting ready for a hotfire test on its launch mount and is looking to launch in November. Neutron is targeting 2025, but it looks more like 2026 at this rate. If both these vehicles are successful that would give the US three reusable launch vehicles within the next 12 months. In the "traditional" space segment, ULA's Vulcan Centaur is also gearing up for another launch and has a large launch manifest.
The reality is that if Blue Origin, Rocket Lab and ULA all execute on their vehicles the US is actually in a position to expand its dominance in launch vehicles. This goes without mentioning the fact that SpaceX was just approved for an additional 50 launches per-year from Vandenberg Space Force Base. Something that they expect to have no trouble in scaling to meet.
This raises an important point.
Basically, the US is almost completely dependent upon a single company whereas China has a growing "space stack" with multiple rockets, some from private companies and some from public entities. Without Falcon 9, China would already dominate space flight.
If LandSpace succeeds then it would overturn the US dominance.
I don't really think it does raise an important point at all. That post is basically saying if the US didn't have the best rocket it wouldn't be a leader. SpaceX dominates for a reason, they mastered reusability and scaled launch cadence consistently. This allowed them to corner the global market. LandSpace successfully landing a single rocket isn't going to change SpaceX dominance or trajectory.
Outside of that, the US has Blue Origin and Rocket Lab both looking to launch reusable launch vehicles shortly. New Glenn is getting ready for a hotfire test on its launch mount and is looking to launch in November. Neutron is targeting 2025, but it looks more like 2026 at this rate. If both these vehicles are successful that would give the US three reusable launch vehicles within the next 12 months. In the "traditional" space segment, ULA's Vulcan Centaur is also gearing up for another launch and has a large launch manifest.
The reality is that if Blue Origin, Rocket Lab and ULA all execute on their vehicles the US is actually in a position to expand its dominance in launch vehicles. This goes without mentioning the fact that SpaceX was just approved for an additional 50 launches per-year from Vandenberg Space Force Base. Something that they expect to have no trouble in scaling to meet.





