A conversation about government overreach is the LAST thing anyone in power wants. In addition, once a constitutional crisis has occurred and not immediately rectified, under common law it sets legal precedent, so even going back on it will require passage of further federal law... which has the precedent of selective enforcement.I did not consider this! you have a really good point, a non-decision is in fact a ticking time bomb.
But optimistically, the idea is that the next administration is less crazy than Trump, and they would see how banning tiktok is a blatant violation of their own country's constitution. Not to mention even if they are dead set on being anti-china, they will still need to listen to public sentiment. And after the Trump administration, I believe that there will be a HUGE public scrutiny about governmental overreach, which would be in benefit of Tiktok.
We will see how it goes, these are just educated guesses.
At this point, all that has to happen is preventing an unfair sale whether by government force or ByteDance not seeing a good enough deal, and everything else that happens, happens.

