Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Iran has been trying to make a fighter engine for quite some time already. But it is unlikely Russia would share that kind of technology.
some time sharing is not practical especially after Ukraine conflict. Russia may want to minimize its scientist and engineers exposure. I saw Putin statement that not only foreign specialist has to demonstrate traditional values but Russian interacting with them must. thats why you get all the big events and manufacturing centered around Kazan. Kazan can manage Geran/Shahed production and any foreign labor on this scale.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Putin has banned the purchase of foreign-made military uniforms from 2026
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
View attachment 158780
Seems like the Borei class is alot smaller than public data would suggest. Satellite measurements shows the sub is actually only ~156m long while public data says its 170m long. Actual displacement may only be 16000-18000t.

Sourced from Cute Orca's weibo
It is quite hard to measure something from sat picture, and meaure the length of a sub in water is even harder.

Here is a Borei (Knyaz Oleg) lenght in a drydock from 2020/07.

borei.jpg
And the first three length could be different , they been built from Akula forward sections.

Problem is there is no pic of them in drydock.
 

Tomboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
It is quite hard to measure something from sat picture, and meaure the length of a sub in water is even harder.

Here is a Borei (Knyaz Oleg) lenght in a drydock from 2020/07.

View attachment 158821
And the first three length could be different , they been built from Akula forward sections.

Problem is there is no pic of them in drydock.
If you look closely the pic, you'll see it includes the pump jet at the end so unless there is a good 15m at the front under the waterline, I don't see how 170m is possible in anyway. Also, here a follow on pic that measures an Oscar that is docked next to the Borei and the measurement lines up perfectly with published spec. So, I don't think this is an issue with the measurement software or the satellite photo itself. Its either that the first three subs as you said are different or most public source are wrong about this.007YjO1pgy1i4kioemiwij315x14bu0x.jpg
 

nativechicken

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't think it's true Russia is ahead in hypersonics or nuclear power at all.

There's literally zero evidence for hypersonics whereas China has fielded at least their second generation of hypersonic gliders and at least first gen of cruise missile, Russia is at gen 1 for glider and gen 1 for cruise and I think this is giving them a bit more credit.

Nuclear power im less familiar with but China has got 3 different experimental reactor types running concurrently.

On renewables, computing, chips, cars, energy storage, digital infrastructure, cloud computing, shipbuilding, space. Yeah Russia is either far behind or getting lapped with over 1 generation gap.
China's fourth-generation nuclear power involves saturated development efforts, with specialized teams currently researching all six known reactor types.
Currently, U.S. nuclear industry professionals acknowledge trailing behind China in fourth-generation nuclear technology—a gap that began even since the third generation.
Truth be told, the third-generation technology China licensed from Westinghouse was technically incomplete, riddled with issues.
China conducted comprehensive improvements before unveiling its own product.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
BMP-3 is getting the UTD-32T engine being tested. This raises the power output from the current engine, the UTD-29, from 500hp to 660hp. This was the engine originally planned for the BMP-3M Manual.



After all the cope cages and Tsar Mangals added to the BMP-3, it has turned a nimble vehicle to a lumbering beast. Upgrading the power will help.

I know some of you might be thinking. Better bring the Manul, Bumerang, or the Kurganets-25 into production. Don't bet on it though.
 

nativechicken

Junior Member
Registered Member
Sorry but the Burevestnik is a terrible weapon. It's so prone to issues and just a hazard for everyone. If you want a loitering nuke, perfect a FOBS. A flying nuclear reactor was also explored by Soviets and Americans since the 1960s. Nuclear powered aircraft (bombers in the Cold War cases) and nuclear powered cruise missiles. The American one was called Project Pluto. They abandoned it because they realised how insane the idea was. Russia persisted for some reason perhaps they convinced themselves they need it but honestly who is going to threaten Russia with anything existential when Russia has enough nukes to wipe the rest of the world twice over with nuclear triad.

Just because Russia fielded the Burevestnik doesn't mean they're ahead of the Americans in miniature reactors. I'm sure the Americans could do a similar thing and possibly even make it work more reliably. China on the other hand is certainly weaker than the other two in miniature reactors for now.
Actually, several years ago, China had already produced multiple research papers on nuclear-powered aircraft designs for supporting long-endurance aerial vehicles.

Additionally, it's quite easy to find Chinese literature on miniature nuclear reactors—specs like size, weight and cycle principles are clearly laid out.

The literature on space nuclear power is packed with info. Space reactors can generate from dozens to hundreds of kilowatts, with core diameters around 0.3-1m and lengths varying between 0.6-1.5m. Weight ranges from under 1 ton to 2 tons (nozzle excluded).

China's space reactors feature dual-mode thermal/electric capabilities.

When people claim the US leads in miniature nuclear reactors, I just shrug noncommittally. What I do know is American nuclear experts are practically frantic.

The US has built only 2 reactors in recent years, while China has constructed dozens. About 50 large nuclear plants are queued for construction—completing these would nearly match America's historical peak nuclear capacity.

As for Russia's miniature reactors? All I've seen are Chinese space reactor papers in recent years discussing how ground test facilities should be built (incidentally reviewing historical US/Russian equipment). Typically when such papers appear in Chinese journals, the experimental setups are near completion.

These seemingly watered-down journal descriptions actually contain excerpts from project progress reports—including international peers' advancements plus China's refined solutions and implementation measures—published for expert review. Otherwise, technical leads on classified defense projects would face career advancement issues.

So, what tier would you place China's miniature reactor tech?
 

spaarg0451

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

UAC has delivered another batch of new multifunctional Su-35S fighters to the Russian Aerospace Forces ✈️

The 4++ generation aircraft have completed a full cycle of factory tests, were accepted by the technical staff, and tested in various operational modes by pilots of the Russian Ministry of Defense.

“As part of the implementation of the targeted tasks set by the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation for the supply of weapons and equipment to the troops, the crews of the Aerospace Forces have accepted the Su-35S aircraft, which will then be deployed to the front lines to carry out special military operation tasks, as well as to protect the state border. The aircraft allows performing all tasks assigned to our aviation, from covering aviation equipment to covering ground targets,” said a Su-35S pilot of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

The flight crew of the Aerospace Forces also thanked the manufacturer for a reliable, modern, and durable machine.

“Rostec’s aviation plants maintain a high pace of aircraft production under the state defense order. This year, several batches of Su-35S fighters have already been delivered to the troops, and this process continues, with new aircraft currently in production for upcoming deliveries. The Su-35S is one of the most effective combat aircraft in the world, armed with long-range guided air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles. It also features an onboard electronic warfare and defense system and other advanced electronics, making the fighter a true menace to the enemy,” said Rostec’s Executive Director Oleg Yevtushenko.

The Su-35S is a transitional link to fifth-generation aviation complexes. The powerplant, based on new engines with a digital control system and thrust vectoring, significantly improves the aircraft’s flight and maneuvering characteristics.

“The production of in-demand military products under the state defense order is one of our top priorities. An increase in production volumes is planned for almost all types of such products this year, and therefore we continue to modernize our manufacturing facilities,” said UAC General Director Vadim Badeha.
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
View attachment 158776

Hypersonic Cruise Missile

Fiction: Zircon ... The Hindu Zircon

Reality: "early ramjet - scramjet "dual purpose" engine powered basic tube missiles" (ougoah)

View attachment 158777
Dont assume from public demonstration of missile as real or every version of zircon missile. there are more advanced hypersonic missiles. RT Arabic had a article on advanced missile. when they did that Orshenik test. The version for Tu-160M2 may have range exceed KH-BD.

Ukranian calls Onyx stealthy missile due to difficulty in detecting.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Tsirkon, Oniks and Kh-22 missiles: why they are difficult to shoot down and how to defend against them

Why is it difficult to destroy​

The main problem for our air defense is high speed and low altitude. Ukrainian Air Force spokesman Yuriy Ignat explained why it is difficult for Ukrainian air defense to shoot down the Onyx missiles that Russia used to attack Odessa and Nikolaev. According to him, these missiles fly at high speed and low altitude, so they are difficult to detect and shoot down.

- Oniks missiles are designed to destroy floating craft and ships, they fly at a speed of 2.6 Mach. This is more than 3,000 km per hour, that is, the speed is high. On the march, it can rise high to save fuel, and when approaching the target, it can fly actually 10-15 meters above the water to destroy the ship, - the military man said.

That is why it is difficult for our radars to capture it. The complex is hardly noticeable for radars, as it is made using STEALTH technologies. Therefore, the Onyx missile is harder to intercept than the subsonic Kalibr, and its production cost is cheaper than the new Russian hypersonic missiles Zircon and Kinzhal.


It only took three minutes from Crimea to Kiev. they dont know what type of missile. they can have many versions of Zircons/Onyx. This is like Mach 15.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Russians could have used Oniks missiles for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This opinion
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the spokesman of the Naval Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Dmitry Pletenchuk.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Russians have deployed two new mystery AI driven drones, the V2U and the MS001. The first I mistook that for a Lancet, and is confirmed with some Ukrainian interceptions of it. Just missing the name of designation to put it altogether. The V2U acts like a smart loiter munition, while the MS001 might already be responsible for a number of tactical strikes attributed to Gerans.


Little is known about the Piranha FPV drone, even though the name has appeared a year earlier, and first seen in the Group Center area of conflict. One of it's early notable takeouts was an Abrams tank in the Avdiivka sector early last year. Production of the drone has vastly increased since then. The Upyr and VT-40 FPV drones that have become much better known, are created from crowd funded startups, but the Piranha comes from the Russian MIC, it's development assisted by the Russian MoD.


Another variant of the Typhoon-K family of armored vehicles, which has silently become an important pillar for the Russian military. I don't know if it will solve the drone problem, and it may help somewhat, but nonetheless it's a cool looking vehicle. More and more, the most direct way to deal with drones is to simply shoot them down.


Sooner or later this was bound to happen. A Geran struck a HIMARS position. Judging from the secondary explosion, the munitions cooked off.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
Just think about it. The nuclear power source in the Burevestnik cruise missile is something no one else has in service.
Russia also has the most advanced fast reactor program currently. BN-1200M and BREST-OD-300 reactors currently under construction have no equivalents.
As Russians like to say, "Аналогов в мире просто нет!"
BMP-3 is getting the UTD-32T engine being tested. This raises the power output from the current engine, the UTD-29, from 500hp to 660hp. This was the engine originally planned for the BMP-3M Manual.



After all the cope cages and Tsar Mangals added to the BMP-3, it has turned a nimble vehicle to a lumbering beast. Upgrading the power will help.

I know some of you might be thinking. Better bring the Manul, Bumerang, or the Kurganets-25 into production. Don't bet on it though.
I remember the UTD-32 being announced a very... very long time ago.
 
Top