Chinese infantry fighting vehicles

[no_name]

^^^Looking at the track/wheels in the two pics, does these vehicles have a raised/lowered position?

 

[SanWenYu]

^^^Looking at the track/wheels in the two pics, does these vehicles have a raised/lowered position?

Must be active suspension. Type 15, and 99, already have it.

 

[Gloire_bb]

Btw, another notable - new amphibious planing "禁止拍照" tank seems to use same gun and GFCS, but in otherwise completely different turret.
Tbh i wonder why it doesn't use APS as well - huge, relatively weakly armored, exposed vehicle should need it the most? Maybe because Ka- band really hates water particles, but is it that bad even point blank?

 

[Blitzo]

Btw, another notable - new amphibious planing "禁止拍照" tank seems to use same gun and GFCS, but in otherwise completely different turret.
Tbh i wonder why it doesn't use APS as well - huge, relatively weakly armored, exposed vehicle should need it the most? Maybe because Ka- band really hates water particles, but is it that bad even point blank?

I moved this to the IFV thread because technically this is just the 105mm gun variant of the next gen AAV/ZBD05 family successor.

As for the question you're asking, it could be the fact that it is amphibious and may impact its sensors.

It could also be because this is a relatively early prototype and the bells and whistles would be added in due time and the final turret will look a different.