CITV is in fact generally shared by all 4, other than mortar, and doubles as both main sight(small difference in configuration; I think gunner's one is a bit richer).The new IFV and new airborne IFV and new tank seem to share the same model of CITV.
And the new IFV and airborne IFV share the same model of gunners sight.
CITV is in fact shared by all 4, other than mortar.
I seriously suspect it's, among other functions, unified drone intercept solution.
Since it's an APC, it probably doesn't have a dedicated gunner in the first place; either way, it's same freely moving EO head with same main aperture. Secondary one is larger and square when it's main sight, and smaller and circular when it's secondary/CITV.No, I think the airborne APC doesn't have a CITV.
Since it's an APC, it probably doesn't have a dedicated gunner in the first place; either way, it's same sensor with same main aperture. Secondary one is larger and square when it's main sight, and smaller and circular when it's secondary/CITV.
How is the CITV system going to work tho, it being integrated onto the RWS which is also expected to do antidrone duty and whatever else means it cannot turn independently. So whenever the RWS is doing anything the commander cannot use his CITV to look around or perform HK abilities. Western MBT has both a thermal viewer/sensor on the RWS and a independent CITV. So surely this tank would also have a dedicated CITV somewhere.No, I think the airborne APC doesn't have a CITV.
The airborne APC's primary optic equipped with its remote weapons station, is the same gunner sight found on the new IFV and new airborne IFV; they have square+circle openings.
The CITVs OTOH have a circle+oval openings in a slightly taller housing compared to the gunner sight of the IFV/airborne IFV