How good is ws-15 and ws-10c in terms of thrust to weight ratio and how does it compare with f-135 which is the most advanced right now in terms of thrust to weight.
What ACuriousPLAFan is right but anyway here's some public data engine specs i've found and put them in a chart. So you won't have to be scraping the internet for data like me. If anyone wants to add some figures I'll oblige. The Yellow numbers are my speculation/backwards calculations like for example known T/W ratios given, and reverse calculations that wet thrust is generally 50% more than dry thrust. It's just something that helps me keep track of any new info.How good is ws-15 and ws-10c in terms of thrust to weight ratio and how does it compare with f-135 which is the most advanced right now in terms of thrust to weight.
Kaveri has every bits of information out in the open precisely because it is a failed project. No one, not even the Indians, wants to use it.The Indian kaveri on the other hand, despite being a failed engine it has all the info out there.
Fantastic info, i've been looking/asking for such info on chinese engines recently.What ACuriousPLAFan is right but anyway here's some public data engine specs i've found and put them in a chart. So you won't have to be scraping the internet for data like me. If anyone wants to add some figures I'll oblige. The Yellow numbers are my speculation/backwards calculations like for example known T/W ratios given, and reverse calculations that wet thrust is generally 50% more than dry thrust. It's just something that helps me keep track of any new info.
View attachment 155874
Chinese engines really have no info/hard to find anything. The Indian kaveri on the other hand, despite being a failed engine it has all the info out there.
I think you overestimated the new ws-19 and underestimated the new ws-15 in terms of thrust. More likely be around 110kn and 180kn. Also the new ws-15 most definitely has a larger bypass ratio than 0.25, more like 0.37 from what I've heard.What ACuriousPLAFan is right but anyway here's some public data engine specs i've found and put them in a chart. So you won't have to be scraping the internet for data like me. If anyone wants to add some figures I'll oblige. The Yellow numbers are my speculation/backwards calculations like for example known T/W ratios given, and reverse calculations that wet thrust is generally 50% more than dry thrust. It's just something that helps me keep track of any new info.
View attachment 155874
Chinese engines really have no info/hard to find anything. The Indian kaveri on the other hand, despite being a failed engine it has all the info out there.
Also the f119 actually had a thrust of 162kn, it was a 35000lb"class"engine but is actually capable of producing around 37000lbsWhat ACuriousPLAFan is right but anyway here's some public data engine specs i've found and put them in a chart. So you won't have to be scraping the internet for data like me. If anyone wants to add some figures I'll oblige. The Yellow numbers are my speculation/backwards calculations like for example known T/W ratios given, and reverse calculations that wet thrust is generally 50% more than dry thrust. It's just something that helps me keep track of any new info.
View attachment 155874
Chinese engines really have no info/hard to find anything. The Indian kaveri on the other hand, despite being a failed engine it has all the info out there.