The Kashmir conflict 2025.

4Tran

New Member
Registered Member
For this I will have to disagree, I shit on Indians a lot but on a purely technical basis, they are actually somewhat competent. On an action basis, well…

Their major problem is with expectations management, feature creep and believing their own BS. And I can’t believe I am actually about to defend the Tejas, but here we are. In the case of the Tejas, the 50 year timeline was feature creep, the delay in production was expectations management and it was all caused by them believing their own BS. But ultimately it is still a relatively competent aircraft for what it is, not for what they believe it to be.

Nowadays stealthiness isn’t really that difficult to achieve at least from structural design point of view, the radar dampening material will be a problem for them along with the engine. However, structure is set, pretty much doing what everyone does, converging on the f22, f35 and j35 structure, the same thing the Koreans and Turks are doing. Not sure what they will do for the materials side and for engines they will probably just do their usual, buying it from somewhere, unless Kaveri finally becomes de-meme-ified. Software side shouldn’t be as big of a problem.

Having said all this, I am not saying it will match US, China, Russia or hell even the Europeans. But having a 5th gen fighter isn’t out of the realm of possibility, reliability aside that is. A flying coffin is still something that flies.
Likewise, I don't think that it's out of the question for India to build a fifth generation fighter. However the process is going to be very painful and it's going to take a very long time. India just put out a tender looking for someone to bid on the program so it's likely that this project will have to throw out most of the work that's gone into AMCA so far. If we take KAAN as a guide, it will be another 13 years before AMCA's first flight. And that's in the unlikely chance that India treats the project as a proper weapons program instead of a prestige project.
 

xyz4321

Junior Member
Registered Member
Important thing to note,
While we have plenty of Indian footage of Pakistani rockets/missiles/drones inside India, I don't think I've seen any Indian projectile approaching a target inside Pakistan except for a couple Israeli drones. And that is taking into consideration the fact that civil internet/electricity was cutoff only in India.

This appears to suggest that Indian ground forces were also completely neutralized and outmatched in this scenario.

There is another one false claims shooting down Awacs 400kms inside pakistani airspace.
Also about shooting down C130J, Which I dont think PAF even operates (india does) so maybe they shot down their own? again? :eek:
There is a video of a fire behind a C-130. It's not clear enough to determine if the aircraft was damaged. But it looked like the fire was behind the aircraft.

Do we have any latest info..... seems 3 Rafales & 1 M2k....

@siegecrossbow

View attachment 153378
Martin Baker's count isn't telling enough. There is evidence of a Rafale crash in which the pilot(s) could not eject; some eyewitnesses said two dead pilots were pulled out of the wreckage. MB would not update on ejection failure.

Hindus being a mix of the Harkonnens and Geonosian is really not on my Bingo card for 2025.....


Does the Mace have any meaning beside wielding power or something?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

After May 7, I doubt that you'll find any IAF pilots willing to take up their planes within PL-15 range of Pakistan.
You could say PAF has effectively created an aerial buffer zone of +150km inside Indian territory and left the Indians (as well as everyone else except China) to guess whether this buffer zone extends to 300km. Lol

Even if that is the case, destroyed S-400 or Fuel depots will show smoke the next day.
If fire is put out immediately, why would smoke appear into the next day? Either way, there is plenty of footage in the previous pages of IAF bases billowing with smoke throughout the day.

What happened to all those superior Indian programmers who can't break the Rafael's source code for Indians to then whine hard about France not giving them access? And Indians think they can learn something about the PL-15... if it's real? Again we're talking about known liars because they're so bad at it. Then they have to "give" it to the Japanese to have them dissect it. What does that tell you?
I think India is giving it to the Japanese to assure them that they are fkd as well.
 

xyz4321

Junior Member
Registered Member
"Hindu Zionist".. this is what they came to do in Pakistan - "turn it into Gaza".
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I wrote of this in the misc thread a few times last year - India is trying to replicate the Israeli system, step by step and inch by inch.
Here they say it openly.
__________

Indian journalist says IAF bases near border used to be very active with flights but now it is very quiet; claims from his sources that IAF aircraft have been pushed 300km back. PL-15E̶?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
__________

All the destroyed Indian equipment,
There's a Brahmos seeker in there too!
Gscr5JdWwAAeKtU.jpeg
GsctW_aXkAAc0X6.jpegGscuk-lWcAANzhM.jpegGscvm5HWYAAYKDE.jpegGscwo8kWQAAkDdH.jpegGscyBMoWAAAm1uP.jpegGscyiIIXUAARntU.jpeg
 

xyz4321

Junior Member
Registered Member

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Now I hope the Pakistani had realized that China had contribute the most in their victory against India NOT Turkiye, tactically their drone may achieved some LOCAL success But IN OVERALL Tactical and geopolitical level the Chinese did it.;)

Okay success had many father and failure is an orphan, in this report we can finally say the seed came from a Chinese. ;)
 

Black Wolf

Junior Member
Registered Member
Now I hope the Pakistani had realized that China had contribute the most in their victory against India NOT Turkiye, tactically their drone may achieved some LOCAL success But IN OVERALL Tactical and geopolitical level the Chinese did it.;)

Okay success had many father and failure is an orphan, in this report we can finally say the seed came from a Chinese. ;)

Not quite sure how you arrived at the conclusion that "Pakistanis now realize" it was solely China behind the success.

In reality, it was a well-coordinated mix of systems like AWACS, fighters, BVRAAMs, drones, AD, ECM/ESM units, and MLRS sourced from China, US, EU, Türkiye and also developed indigenously.

Equally important was the successful integration of systems like Link-16 and Link-17, which played a critical role in network-centric warfare. Let’s also not overlook the rigorous training and professionalism of the personnel such as pilots and ground Teams alike that made the system work as a cohesive whole.

Victory in modern warfare is rarely the result of a single system's contribution, it's about integration, adaptation, and execution.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
In reality, it was a well-coordinated mix of systems like AWACS, fighters, BVRAAMs, drones, AD, ECM/ESM units, and MLRS sourced from China, US, EU, Türkiye and also developed indigenously.

Equally important was the successful integration of systems like Link-16 and Link-17, which played a critical role in network-centric warfare. Let’s also not overlook the rigorous training and professionalism of the personnel such as pilots and ground Teams alike that made the system work as a cohesive whole.

Victory in modern warfare is rarely the result of a single system's contribution, it's about integration, adaptation, and execution.
I'm with you bro, I just want to know what really did Turkiye contribute regarding system integration, the plane that was used was a Chinese plane using a Chinese missile. Knowing Turkiye support for Uyghur separatist will the Chinese allowed the Turks to inspect and give the source code? definite not cause the trust isn't there.

Okay maybe the F16 cause both of them operate the same plane BUT the American will never allowed that , the reason why the F16 is a non factor in this conflict.
 
Last edited:

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
Now I hope the Pakistani had realized that China had contribute the most in their victory against India NOT Turkiye, tactically their drone may achieved some LOCAL success But IN OVERALL Tactical and geopolitical level the Chinese did it.;)

Okay success had many father and failure is an orphan, in this report we can finally say the seed came from a Chinese. ;)
Honestly its frustrating how China never really gets the credit it deserves. Even when it achieves something, great they will find ways to trivialize it. Oh well , constantly overlooking China is fine since China prefers that you come to face it unprepared.
 
Top