Look, it's not important how many planes like Rafales, SU-30MKI, MiG-29 or Mirage 2000 were shot down. It is more important that you must see that we won or else all this great effort at social media banning, cellphone confiscations and fake news will be for nothing!
The Kashmir conflict 2025.
- Thread starter ohan_qwe
- Start date
Look, it's not important how many planes like Rafales, SU-30MKI, MiG-29 or Mirage 2000 were shot down. It is more important that you must see that we won or else all this great effort at social media banning, cellphone confiscations and fake news will be for nothing!
Reading the comments I just noticed that YT haven’t recommended me videos from Eurasian naval insight and that’s because his channel got nuked from Indian mass reporting(RIP)
I think he is a member of this forum, does anyone knows his @?
Stuff like this is why I think China was ahead of the curve with the internet firewall.
I think the more likely reason is that because of India's disparate systems by different countries, they use open comms because that is the only way to achieve interoperability.
That's a fair observation, but I believe it's less about the use of disparate systems and more about the ability and adaptability to integrate and operate them efficiently.
For instance, Pakistan operates a diverse range of platforms like Chinese fighters, Saab AWACS, Turkish and Chinese drones, EU-sourced ESM/ECM systems, various AD units, and indigenous systems like the Fateh MLRS. Despite this diversity, interoperability is achieved through frameworks like Link 16 and Link 17.
Ultimately, it's the integration capability, adaptability of the forces, and consistent training that allow such a mix of systems to be effectively employed in a cohesive operational environment.
Don't worry guys, just a minor scratch from the PL-15, they had insurance cover the damage so no loss to Gai Hind air force.
I am sorry for posting this tweet. But I died of laughter when I saw this.
"If one may ask, Why the engine was flying without the "jet"...."
You're overcomplicating this. I didn’t bring up politics, I simply echoed what the public is already saying. People in Pakistan are very aware of the censorship they face. Just because it doesn’t fit your preferred narrative doesn’t make it partisan.
Turning this into a competition over which country censors more, or who got arrested where, is just deflection. Censorship and suppression exist in both India and Pakistan pretending otherwise doesn’t change the facts. And let’s not ignore the obvious: wasn’t X already banned before the recent clashes even started? That alone speaks volumes.
You also can’t keep brushing aside the military establishment’s role not just in censorship, but in openly interfering with the democratic process. They didn’t just influence public discourse; they literally turned the entire election. People saw it unfold in real time.
Labeling critics as “Hanjian” or disloyal Pakistanis is just a lazy attempt to silence dissent. That’s not patriotism that’s fear of accountability.
Lastly, let’s not derail the thread. This isn’t the place for partisan point-scoring. Stay on topic and stop trying to deflect valid criticism under the guise of national loyalty.
Last edited: