The Kashmir conflict 2025.

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
IMO we still aren't that sure of what China's stance on this matter is other than that vague statement from the FM, if the conflict escalates into a real war will China publicly support Pakistan militarily?
Both are China neighbors, both nuclear... If the conflict escalade, involvement is a tricky thing, beside destroying both neighbors nuclear deterrence. Cannot let a side win too much. China surely don't want that conflict to escalade and pride loss from losing for India or Pakistan can trigger the worse.

Could China pull a political move to tame the situation ? Hard to tell, Chinese weapons are in use right now on the front.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
IMO we still aren't that sure of what China's stance on this matter is other than that vague statement from the FM, if the conflict escalates into a real war will China publicly support Pakistan militarily?
That’s fair. However, I think we can do some inference. Let’s for the sake argument say that there is no friendship talk between China and Pak, but there is still the matter of interests.

With BRI investments and the resource corridor, I think there is enough interests for China to act if not directly then at least indirectly.

We might not see boots on the ground but military support and supplies shouldn’t be much of an issue, which is consistent with their usual stance of sovereignty, China wouldn’t want India taking PoK. There is also the issue that this conflict is literally on China’s borders that might change the equation quite a bit.
 

bsdnf

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's ridicule time again

What many people don't know is that the Rafale was actually developed concurrently with the J-10. I think back then, Chinese designers even inspected the prototype of the Rafale.

Three decades have passed. AVIC Chengdu has progressed from the J-10 to the J-20 then J-36, while the French have been chanting mantras like "generational classifications are artificial" and "the best 4.5th-gen fighter" for twenty years.

So let me ask you: When there is a gap of two generations, is it still reliable to use the so-called "artificial gen" to blur the boundaries? If not, then how can an aviation corporation that can't even develop a 5th-gen fighter claim its 4.5th-gen aircraft is superior to the 4.5th-gen jets created by a company developing 6th-gen fighters?

look at my eyes. why, baby, why?
 
Last edited:

Expert1324

New Member
Registered Member
"nothing surprising tbh, all planes are prone to get shot down no matter how advanced, its no big deal"
"rafale still the best 4.5 jet, its just down to pilots and luck."
"We are actually the biggest victor here because we used 2 females to brief the media on operation sindoor"

Lmao god forbit if the situation is reversed these clowns will be the first to laugh about "chinese junk". And they are acting like the indian pilots did not even have a car license, aren't the rafale only given to the best pilot in the indian air force, what a bunch of clowns on the internet.

Also, they are like the worse country for a women to exist in, but now using a literal war to detract about some empowering women irrelevant bullshit... I cant even lmao
 
Top