China's Space Program Thread II

[ENTED64]

First, I recommend reading this article (

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

). After checking related materials, it’s clear that China’s 2024 space launches saw minimal delays or changes in national-level projects. The main shortfall came from commercial launch companies, which fell short by at least 22 planned launches.

This is totally normal. Startups and early-stage tech products often face instability and delays—it’s part of the process. Look at U.S., European, Japanese, Russian, or Indian space companies: except SpaceX, whose launch schedules aren’t constantly slipping? Even SpaceX’s Starship is behind schedule. The only reason Falcon 9 looks "stable" is because it’s a mature rocket focused on launching its own Starlink satellites. When Falcon 9 handles external payloads, it still gets delayed—like the recent crew return mission that was postponed multiple times.

China’s new space companies are testing brand-new rockets, so delays and hiccups are expected. They’ll need a few years to iron out the kinks.

These are all fair points, but the fact is they did fall short of their announced goal, even if it was mostly just commercial entities failing to improve as fast as predicted. This is a goal they themselves announced so it's not like it's something random uninvolved people speculated was their goal, they deliberately set this goal and fell short. This is why I objected to categorizing it as all just "deliberate strategic pacing". This brings me to:

SpaceX was founded around 2000. It took them 13–14 years to develop Falcon 9 v1.1–1.2, 15–16 years to achieve first-stage reuse (2010–2015), and 30 launches to refine the tech. The reuse process alone took 5–6 years.
Chinese companies, meanwhile, are mostly under 10 years old (many under 6). Expecting them to match Falcon 9 while also developing engines is unrealistic. Early-stage instability is natural.
Key points about China’s reusable rockets:

Most companies are still in the "single-use rocket" phase (≤5 launches over 1–2 years). Reusability R&D is just starting.
By 2030, not one company but a group of firms will likely achieve reusable tech—some faster, some slower.

If that is the case then aren't you basically saying the announced Thousand Sails/Guowang timelines are unfeasible and should be disregarded? If reusable rockets are more of 4-5 years away than at most 1-2 years away from large scale deployment then the announced Thousand Sails/Guowang timelines are completely unachievable. Why would they announce such targets if they (presumably) know it's completely impossible? Are these all old announcements before they realized how much more work it would take?

National Team: Building next-gen giants for lunar bases and beyond.
Private Firms: Glorified interns handling “homework” the state team delegated.

I am somewhat surprised they didn't increase the priority/resources of the reusable rockets project given how Starlink since a few years ago has been demonstrated to be very significant for the military right now. In your telling they seem to just shrug and accept they will be very far behind until at least early 2030s.

 

[nativechicken]

If that is the case then aren't you basically saying the announced Thousand Sails/Guowang timelines are unfeasible and should be disregarded? If reusable rockets are more of 4-5 years away than at most 1-2 years away from large scale deployment then the announced Thousand Sails/Guowang timelines are completely unachievable. Why would they announce such targets if they (presumably) know it's completely impossible? Are these all old announcements before they realized how much more work it would take?

Everyone estimates progress based on ideal conditions. If unexpected problems arise—issues that only become apparent after implementation has begun—then delays are normal.

I am somewhat surprised they didn't increase the priority/resources of the reusable rockets project given how Starlink since a few years ago has been demonstrated to be very significant for the military right now. In your telling they seem to just shrug and accept they will be very far behind until at least early 2030s.

You need to understand one thing: The 2030 timeframe doesn’t mean large-scale reusable rocket launches will start only then. In reality, as long as rockets are mature and stable, even expendable rockets can handle high-frequency launches. What truly matters is ensuring satellite orbital insertion—if recovery fails afterward, it doesn’t affect the launch itself.
The reason launches haven’t started yet is purely because expendable rockets aren’t even ready. Most will have their maiden flights around 2025-2027. There’s no need to panic about this.

When SpaceX was developing early on, they also faced delays. For modern rockets, achieving success 1-3 years behind schedule is normal—all within acceptable margins of error.

 

[oseaidjubzac]

Recently, the Lijian-2 rocket successfully completed its bundled joint static test. As China’s first general-purpose core bundled launch vehicle to undergo dual-limit condition verification of “maximum internal pressure + maximum overload,” this test marks a breakthrough by filling the technological gap in ground testing of bundled rockets in the country.
During the test, the main load-bearing structure adopted a configuration of “real bundling mechanism + dedicated short propellant tanks,” simulating the load conditions during actual flight. The test was carried out through staged loading from maximum internal pressure to maximum overload, and the objectives were fully achieved. The displacement and strain data collected during the test closely matched the simulation predictions.
At present, preparations for the maiden flight of the Lijian-2 rocket are progressing rapidly, with the prototype of the Qingzhou cargo spacecraft scheduled to launch in a trial flight this September.

 

[by78]

According to Mr. Zhang Chongfeng of CASC, the proof-of-concept/demonstrator manned lunar vehicle being developed by CASC has finished testing at lunar surface simulation field. The project is now moving onto initial prototyping stage.

The Fifth Academy of CASC is

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

the Guangzhou Automotive Group to develop its prototype manned lunar vehicle.

 

[gpt]

TJS-16 launched. Satellite patch: Vaiśravaṇa, King of the north and the one who hears everything/God of Warriors
TJS-15 (launched earlier this month). Satellite patch: Virūpākṣa, King of the west and one who sees all"
View attachment 149004View attachment 149005

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909700911045525953

TJS-15 is being approached by US Space Force's GSSAP (Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program) inspection satellite. Probably looking to get within a 10-30km to take photos or collect SIGINT.

 

[by78]

Photos of LandSpace Jiaxing production base, which show multiple Zhuque-2E launch vehicles being assembled. Six launches of this vehicle are planned for 2025.

 

[by78]

Construction progress of the Long March 10 moon rocket launchpad + the new vehicle assembly hall.

 

[by78]

Satellite images of a 50MW solar thermal power station in Hami taken by Jilin-1 Kuanfu-02B05.

 

[escobar]

From USSF Intelligence Headquarters

PLA actively training on direct-ascent antisatellite (DA-ASAT) missile system today

TJS-12 is a GEO remote sensing satellite from SAST

PLA has multiple ground-based laser weapons able to disrupt, degrade, or damage satellite sensors. By the mid-to-late 2020s, they could have higher-power systems able to damage satellite structures

China utilizes at least 10 satellites to conduct on-orbit space situational awareness (SSA). These autonomous observation satellites in LEO have mitigated China’s lack of global ground-based SSA sensors.

 

[gpt]

From USSF Intelligence Headquarters




View attachment 149699View attachment 149700

China utilizes at least 10 satellites to conduct on-orbit space situational awareness (SSA).

I believe these are Shijian-6.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and Shijian-15/16

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!