Why not use QMK171 for comparison?Yeah, that stone wall is right at the 200 meter mark.
Why not use QMK171 for comparison?Yeah, that stone wall is right at the 200 meter mark.
I'll do that today when my camera/picatinny equipment arrives. I was balancing the scope on a tripod head with the camera behind it. I decided that was too risky and I'll just be patient and wait for the right tool xD.Why not use QMK171 for comparison?
Could you do an eyebox test in the video moving the camera around?I'll do that today when my camera/picatinny equipment arrives. I was balancing the scope on a tripod head with the camera behind it. I decided that was too risky and I'll just be patient and wait for the right tool xD.
Edit: Those photos are the QMK171 and Elcan
Will do. If you're wondering, the eyebox is much more forgiving than the ACOG, but the scope body shadow is slightly more noticeable due to the increased eye relief.Could you do an eyebox test in the video moving the camera around?
Were you able to find one?
When was this photo taken? Are these recent adaptations of qmk scopes