China's transport, tanker & heavy lift aircraft - esp. Y-20/YY-20

GiantPanda

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes, but IMO these are unlikely still Y-20As since their numbers were getting smaller thru 2024 ... if I remember correctly, then in October only 4 Y/YY-20A vs 11 Y-20B were seen and in June there have been 9 Y/YY-20A vs 6 Y-20B.

So I think it seems at least more likely and reasonable to assume, until the end of 2024 the final Y/YY-20As were delivered or are due to be so and production of the Y-20B was ramped up.

Nice! Deino, what do you think is the yearly production? We see from the sat photos of around 15-20 Y-20s parked at XAC in different months. Obviously, not every aircraft seen is delivered at the end of each month. But if new aircraft are rotated out per month then the rate could be upwards of 100. Conversely at the other end of things, if aircraft are kept until the end of year before delivery (unlikely because of change in mix of A and B models) then production could be 15 - 20 per year.
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
It would make sense to mass produce in large numbers since the Y-20 now has its intended engines. Though it is impossible to tell if those are Y-20Bs.

That said, I recall that there were satellite pictures of XAC having similar numbers of Y-20s parked on its grounds before so even Y-20A was produced at a pretty good clip.

Sounds like XAC's annual output for the Y-20 in general and the Y-20B in particular, moving forward, will largely be determined by the 606 Institute's capacity for and AECC's general ability to ramp up production of the WS-20 turbofan.

WS-20 is in full scale production.. they have pulsating assembly line means this process greatly reduced assembly time of single machine.

and Y-20A doesn't make sense now.. so mostly all these Y-20s are equipped with WS-20 engines.

Any idea what the current quarterly or annual output for the WS-20 is looking like?

Not trying to be dismissive, but a little surprised the WS-20 has already reached full scale production, granted it is by no means implausible.
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
Sounds like XAC's annual output for the Y-20 in general and the Y-20B in particular, moving forward, will largely be determined by the 606 Institute's capacity for and AECC's general ability to ramp up production of the WS-20 turbofan.



Any idea what the current quarterly or annual output for the WS-20 is looking like?

Not trying to be dismissive, but a little surprised the WS-20 has already reached full scale production, granted it is by no means implausible.
WS-20 is in production at least since late 2022 but on small scale.. they didn't reach full scale production of WS-20 overnight.

in 2021, AECC Shenyang completed the pulsating assembly line of WS-20.

001sJxoyly1hcqar18ezfj60u00smjyd02.jpg

due to this advanced process, single unit of WS-20 assembly time shortened by 2/3. speed has improved less assembly rework and turnover waste have achieved resulting in balance production and high volume delivery..

Shenyang didn't mention yearly production rate of WS-20 but WS-20 shared same lineage as WS-10 so engine will use same supply chain. as we know how many units of WS-10 they are producing annually so you can guess. its all depend on XAC now how many units of Y-20 they can produce. AECC Shenyang can deliver as many units as XAC want.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Nice! Deino, what do you think is the yearly production? We see from the sat photos of around 15-20 Y-20s parked at XAC in different months. Obviously, not every aircraft seen is delivered at the end of each month. But if new aircraft are rotated out per month then the rate could be upwards of 100. Conversely at the other end of things, if aircraft are kept until the end of year before delivery (unlikely because of change in mix of A and B models) then production could be 15 - 20 per year.

100x Y(Y)-20Bs (and KJ-3000s) per year is likely to be too many for such a large military aircraft - And also likely to be too much for Xi'an AC, which actually has other concurrent projects and products to tend to, namely:
- Fulfill any remaining orders for the H-6K/J/N;
- Fulfill any outstanding orders for the MA-60/600;
- Get the MA-700 to fly with WJ-10s; and
- Get the ever-mystique H-20 into the skies.

Speaking of production rates - There are only two jet-powered aircrafts that are of comparable roles to the Y-20 with significantly higher average annual production rates over their entire production runs, historically:
1. KC-135 Stratotanker, with 803 built from 1955 to 1965 = 73 airframes per year, and
2. C-141 Starlifter, with 285 built from 1963 to 1968 = 47.5 airframes per year.

There is also the Il-76, which could have considerably high level of annual production rates during the Soviet-era (maybe ~30-40 airframes per year).

However, it should be noted that:
1. Both the KC-135 and C-141 only have MTOWs of around 140+ tons (compared to the Y-20's 220+ tons MTOW (and more for MRTT/tanker variants)); and
2. Both the KC-135 and C-141 are less complex and challenging to engineer and build back then compared to modern day counterparts.

Therefore, while China certainly does have acute need for the Y-20 family (including variants), somewhere between/around 50 to 70 airframes per year could be a safe upper ceiling bet/estimation.
 
Last edited:

Tomboy

Junior Member
Registered Member
100x Y(Y)-20Bs (and KJ-3000s) per year is likely to be too many for such a large military aircraft - And also likely to be too much for Xi'an AC, which actually has other concurrent projects and products to tend to, namely:
- Fulfill any remaining orders for the H-6K/J/N;
- Fulfill any outstanding orders for the MA-60/600;
- Get the MA-700 to fly with WJ-10s; and
- Get the ever-mystique H-20 into the skies.

Speaking of production rates - There are only two jet-powered aircrafts that are of comparable roles to the Y-20 with significantly higher average annual production rates over the entire production run:
1. KC-135 Stratotanker, with 803 built from 1955 to 1965 = 73 airframes per year, and
2. C-141 Starlifter, with 285 built from 1963 to 1968 = 47.5 airframes per year.

There is also the Il-76, which could have considerably high level of annual production rates during the USSR-era (maybe ~40-60 airframes per year).

However, it should be noted that:
1. Both the KC-135 and C-141 only have MTOWs of around 140+ tons (compared to the Y-20's 220+ tons MTOW (and more for MRTT/tanker variants)); and
2. Both the KC-135 and C-141 are comparably less complex and challenging to engineer and build back then compared to modern day counterparts.

Therefore, while China certainly does have acute need for the Y-20 family (including variants), somewhere between 50 to 70 airframes per year could be a safe upper celling bet/estimation.
If that's the case then China will have more Strategic airlift than the US in a few very short years, if Scramble.nl is to be believed there are currently 102 Y-20(With quite possibly even more currently awaiting delivery parked at the factory) of all variants active including aerial refueling variants. If production is truly 50-70 airframes per year then the number of Y-20s will easily surpass the 222 C-17 that the US has active. This could mean quite a significant boost for PLA strategic deployment. Speaking of which is there any news on the next generation tactical transport? Since it seems that the Y-9 still lags behind C-130s in both range/payload and numbers.
 

lcloo

Major
If that's the case then China will have more Strategic airlift than the US in a few very short years, if Scramble.nl is to be believed there are currently 102 Y-20(With quite possibly even more currently awaiting delivery parked at the factory) of all variants active including aerial refueling variants. If production is truly 50-70 airframes per year then the number of Y-20s will easily surpass the 222 C-17 that the US has active. This could mean quite a significant boost for PLA strategic deployment. Speaking of which is there any news on the next generation tactical transport? Since it seems that the Y-9 still lags behind C-130s in both range/payload and numbers.
You cannot use production rates per year to calculate the total number of Y20 in certain future years. There is only one customer at the moment, the total number will depend on the needs and purchase orders from PLAAF to Xian AVIC.

In C-17's case, the total order accepted was 227 units and therafter they decided not to accept any more orders and shut down the production lines. This is the case of "we will only make 227 C-17 disregard of the production capacity and annual production rate".

How many Y20's will be produced over how many years into the future depends on how many Y20 and Y20 derivative that PLAAF needs.

The production rates will surge to meet orders of PLAAF, and therafter the production rates will go down to meet supplemtary orders of both transport and specialised variants and possibly orders from foreign customers.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Nice! Deino, what do you think is the yearly production? We see from the sat photos of around 15-20 Y-20s parked at XAC in different months. Obviously, not every aircraft seen is delivered at the end of each month. But if new aircraft are rotated out per month then the rate could be upwards of 100. Conversely at the other end of things, if aircraft are kept until the end of year before delivery (unlikely because of change in mix of A and B models) then production could be 15 - 20 per year.


The point is, we have no clear idea how long they are standing at XAC on the ramp before they are delivered. As such to try to conclude "new aircraft are rotated out per month then the rate could be upwards of 100" is as wrong as to think they "are kept until the end of year before delivery".

If you look at Scramble's list in the Database, when a new aircraft was see for the first and how many as such per month or maybe even quarter, we have a much better chance of estimating a realistic production rate. This is surely not 100% correct since we are always late, but still better (IMO):

For example ...

Y-20A transports were seen according to this:
3 in 2016 / 1 in 2017 / 2 in 2018 / 1 in 2019 / 15 in 2020 / 10 in 2021 / 12 in 2022 / 8 in 2023 / 1 in 2024

YY-20A tanker were seen according to this:
2 in 2021 / 2 in 2022 / 5 in 2023 / 16 in 2024 / 1 so far in 2025

in summary per year:
3 in 2016 / 1 in 2017 / 2 in 2018 / 1 in 2019 / 15 in 2020 / 12 in 2021 / 14 in 2022 / 13 in 2023 / 17 in 2024 / 1 in 2025

PS: Just added!
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
...if Scramble.nl is to be believed there are currently 102 Y-20....


Not sure where you see so many at Scramble?!

4th Div/12th Reg: 24 recorded
13th Div/37th Reg: 29 recorded
13th Div/38th Reg: 33 recorded (of which IMO not only the first two were renumbered! ... I have 26 realistically confirmed)
------------------------------
86 maximum ... 79 realistically
 
Top