For anyone interested in the source of these findings. This is the most comprehensive educational survey done in India by an NGO.
So they really want to develop and field a fighter akin to the Rafale for the 2038+ scenarios? Why not better developing a navalised variant of the AMCA?
View attachment 145294
I would think that in 2038 there would be a 7th generation chinese plane flying, so that image is incorrect.
However, if the agreement between India and France to develop an engine for AMCA is successfully finalized, it will be a game-changer. Both nations can pool their resources and technological expertise to create the most advanced engine to date. This engine would not only propel Tejas and AMCA but also any 5th or 6th generation jets designed by India or France in the future.
The more recent TEDBF program appears to owe its existence to the failure of LCA-N owing to marginal performance characteristics (which supports LCA detractors' contention that even the land-based aircraft is chronically overweight) coupled with growth of ambition over time to an aircraft that could, at least in theory, serve as the carrier-based manned combat aircraft for IN. Undoubtedly IN will have been reassured by ADA that TEDBF project cost will be minimised via commonality with LCA systems and learnings from that project. Still, it appears to be an insouciant enterprise with long odds of success.
It is just so NDTV to call an AMCA mockup a prototype. Not only that, they are calling AMCA a "5.5 generation" fighter.
According to the Project Director of AMCA. This 1:1 model is not a "display model", but an "engineering model". He further explains that an "engineering model", is not for display (what?), but for engineering tests. It was apparently made with aircraft-grade materials.
So if that thing belongs in a lab, why display it at Aero India, fully painted and kitted out? Why not just display a mockup, which is far cheaper to make?
The "engineering model" of AMCA, a 5.5 generation fighter lacks IRST, EOTS, DAS, and even has cardboard engine nozzles. But we must trust in the Project Director of AMCA. He must have known what he was saying. He is the Project Director after all.Engineering model instead of display model??!
That actually sounds worse, given that the "engineering model" didn't even feature DAS and IRST (even though the wind tunnel has the latter) - Both of which are standard equipment on literally every single post-F-22 5th-gen fighters around the world. WTF?
View attachment 145420
Also, is cardboard counted as "aircraft-grade material" now? Because the engine nozzles certainly look to be made of cardboard.