Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Leningradpro

New Member
Registered Member

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
However, if the agreement between India and France to develop an engine for AMCA is successfully finalized, it will be a game-changer. Both nations can pool their resources and technological expertise to create the most advanced engine to date. This engine would not only propel Tejas and AMCA but also any 5th or 6th generation jets designed by India or France in the future.

Is India looking to join the French led FCAS program, or perhaps partial participation by investing in the R&D of certain subsystems?

The more recent TEDBF program appears to owe its existence to the failure of LCA-N owing to marginal performance characteristics (which supports LCA detractors' contention that even the land-based aircraft is chronically overweight) coupled with growth of ambition over time to an aircraft that could, at least in theory, serve as the carrier-based manned combat aircraft for IN. Undoubtedly IN will have been reassured by ADA that TEDBF project cost will be minimised via commonality with LCA systems and learnings from that project. Still, it appears to be an insouciant enterprise with long odds of success.


Considering:

(1) French assistance to the LCA program since the 1980s.

(2) India's acquisition of the Dassault Rafale for the IAF, and perhaps soon for IN as well.*

(3) Dassault's willingness to setup a Rafale assembly line in India should a more significant order materialize.*

(4) The physical resemblance shared by the Rafale and TEDBF.

(5) A desire by the Indian MoD for fighter systems like the AMCA, TEDBF, LCA and perhaps even Rafale to share common subsystems for obvious logistical reasons, or so we presume.

(6) The TEDBF's projected 2038 service entry date.

I can't help but want to ask . . .

I. What are the odds the TEDBF and AMCA will share turbofans?

II. Will the TEDBF more or less be a product of de facto and/or even overt de jure Dassault Rafale ToT to India(, but not happening for a decade plus because Paris wants to keep on milking New Delhi for as much and for as long as possible)?

III. What role is French industry playing in the development of the AMCA?

* I don't spend much time tracking Indian defense acquisitions, so please feel free to correct me if anything looks off.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
It is just so NDTV to call an AMCA mockup a prototype. Not only that, they are calling AMCA a "5.5 generation" fighter.

According to the Project Director of AMCA. This 1:1 model is not a "display model", but an "engineering model". He further explains that an "engineering model", is not for display (what?), but for engineering tests. It was apparently made with aircraft-grade materials.
So if that thing belongs in a lab, why display it at Aero India, fully painted and kitted out? Why not just display a mockup, which is far cheaper to make?
 
Last edited:

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
It is just so NDTV to call an AMCA mockup a prototype. Not only that, they are calling AMCA a "5.5 generation" fighter.

According to the Project Director of AMCA. This 1:1 model is not a "display model", but an "engineering model". He further explains that an "engineering model", is not for display (what?), but for engineering tests. It was apparently made with aircraft-grade materials.

So if that thing belongs in a lab, why display it at Aero India, fully painted and kitted out? Why not just display a mockup, which is far cheaper to make?

Engineering model instead of display model??!

That actually sounds worse, given that the "engineering model" didn't even feature DAS and IRST (even though the wind tunnel has the latter) - Both of which are standard equipment on literally every single post-F-22 5th-gen fighters around the world. WTF?

tweet-1888978775410631161.png

Also, is cardboard counted as "aircraft-grade material" now? Because the engine nozzles certainly look to be made of cardboard.
 
Last edited:

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
A display mockup of India's CAT Warrior loyal wingman drone. And yet another presenter is calling a mockup a "prototype".
They do love to talk as if these things are already in service.

India Today is excited to think that the CATs would solve the Indian Airforce's current problem of a lack of squadrons.
So does this mean that the "squadron gap" is no longer an urgent problem then? Since the IAF could wait for the CATs to arrive.
 
Last edited:

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Engineering model instead of display model??!

That actually sounds worse, given that the "engineering model" didn't even feature DAS and IRST (even though the wind tunnel has the latter) - Both of which are standard equipment on literally every single post-F-22 5th-gen fighters around the world. WTF?

View attachment 145420

Also, is cardboard counted as "aircraft-grade material" now? Because the engine nozzles certainly look to be made of cardboard.
The "engineering model" of AMCA, a 5.5 generation fighter lacks IRST, EOTS, DAS, and even has cardboard engine nozzles. But we must trust in the Project Director of AMCA. He must have known what he was saying. He is the Project Director after all.
 
Top