Oh? do you know which game?this is from a game .. LOL
Oh? do you know which game?this is from a game .. LOL
According to Yankee & Shilao, due to the 3rd engine, J-36 EW sit between J16-D and Y-9 EW variant.Nah, there isn't a way a F-16 can see it to begin with. Not just due to stealth but also EW.
Strong aerospace performance is intended to help it in the penetration role, not make it some sort of dogfight specialist. That it can still use it's specs, stealth and EW to dismantle old fighters in wvr is a coincidence, not it's main function.
What about an air based drone carrier that can fly fast and deploy CCAs? In fact isn’t this something the J-36 can do with large weaponsbay? Carry four CCAs in the bay and let them go forth into enemy territory while loitering from behind.
Future more, if comes to WVR, we can't rule out the possibility of direct energy weapon on the J-36.According to Yankee & Shilao, due to the 3rd engine, J-36 EW sit between J16-D and Y-9 EW variant.
So I think J-36 can burn through 4 gen fighter avionic render their missile even gun useless in WVR dogfight.
View attachment 142062View attachment 142063View attachment 142064
A bilibili user name @兰墨飞花 posted his own mesurement:
"
Estimated length 24 metres
Wingspan estimated at 21 metres.
Maximum take-off weight estimated at 44_50 tonnes
Maximum speed is estimated at Mach 3-4.
Front landing gear on two wheels
Rear landing gear two wheels front and rear
Diamond-shaped, large-sidebar, lozenge-shaped, droop-less layout
10 movable flaps, (may be 4 full-action or 10 full-action)
Three engines, three air intakes, two CARET intakes in the lower jaw and one DCI intake in the dorsum
2D TVC nozzles.
Extra-large, extra-long bomb bay.
"
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
As you can see j36`s bomb bay so big that even can carry two yj21 anti-ship missle
that is crazy
i agree with you opinon on j20`s ammo capacity,her bomb bay most likely can carry 6 folded wing PL-15s only.The scaled image comparison between the two is a good effort, but much of the rest of the details are somewhat doubtful.
In particular, depicting J-20 as being able to carry eight folded wing PL-15s is rather confusing.
The idea of J-36 being able to accommodate two KD-21s internally is also a bit doubtful, particularly in terms of the width of the J-36's weapons bay.
The idea of J-36 being a Mach 3-4 aircraft is also a bit overambitious and needs more than eyeballing its aerodynamics.
We have a Chinese military expert say that GaO is almost ready and that will give China a generation gap vs APG-85. There is no proof that hypersonic missiles will be used on J-3I consider my payload assumptions to be much more reasonable than the speculative use of GaO in a 2024 aircraft.
Are you for real? It is impossible to redesign a 5th gen to incorporate a much larger weapon bay just as it is impossible for 4th gen to be stealth.
"Marketing terms" have meaning and value so long as people use them. People are asking what '6th gen' means. I am sharing my view.
The PLAAF disagrees. The PLAAF sees collaboration with UCAV as a common feature of 5th and 6th gen and even advanced 4.5th gen. See latest Shilao & co. podcast.
No, I have been around for a while and it will be best if you keep calm and do a little less hash tagging and flag waving.I think you will find few voices on this forum as informed and as reasoned as mine.
J36 brings many additional capabilities. Like B21 hunting, attacking Guam, Australia and Diego Garcia. Coordinating attacks on carrier groups that are more than 2000 km out. Think hard about these missions and what level of force package you need.Why do we assume that china's 6th gen will do the same as the us 6th gen? Well, us aim to control the battlefield because they have offensive minded. While china is a defensive minded. So why not make a platform to disturb the enemy web instead, so us wont be able to complete their formation? So maybe this j36 is the NGAD counter and not another NGAD?
That is very impressive. The amount of fuel it can hold in those wings once you can use thin T1000 level CFRP. The range is something you can dream on.After closer inspection and more accurate calculations, the J-36 has a wing area of 170m2!
Strangely enough, its length and width are (almost) the same! The difference should be no more than 0.5m!
The UCAVs are unmanned by definition. So I don’t get the pilot part of your response. They are also smaller due to the lower cost nature. They simply do not have the interior space to have same level of electric power generation needed to replace J36.The PLAAF would be a sad and pathetic force if its entire group of aircraft breaks down because one J-36 is taken down.
Its an American caricature that Chinese untermensch pilots lacks initiatives, can't do anything without direct orders, and needs constant micromanagement from a central node.
The speed is used to increase the energy, range, and probability of kill of your own missiles while shrinking the no escape zone of your enemy's missile.
Very important to consider here. I would say 60t is more likely for now but it can go up further as engine enhancement and material science improvement take place over time.To compare the Tupolev 22 M3 has a wing area of 183 m2 for a maximum takeoff weight of 130 t. This aircraft has two turbojets with 50t of total thrust with afterburner. The J36 if equipped with WS15 would be at about 54 t of maximum thrust. As the J36 is a priori a fighter, and, to maintain maneuverability, we can estimate its total takeoff weight at about 75-85t and a dry weight of 35t...
Right, people need to be a little more cautious on what J36 itself will carry and how fast it will fly. These things affect range of the aircraft and PLA will likely aim for best compromise.The scaled image comparison between the two is a good effort, but much of the rest of the details are somewhat doubtful.
In particular, depicting J-20 as being able to carry eight folded wing PL-15s is rather confusing.
The idea of J-36 being able to accommodate two KD-21s internally is also a bit doubtful, particularly in terms of the width of the J-36's weapons bay.
The idea of J-36 being a Mach 3-4 aircraft is also a bit overambitious and needs more than eyeballing its aerodynamics.
yes, DEW is something that J36 has to be designed to accommodate even if it’s not necessarily there in day 1. J36 through high altitude, high speed flying, low observability, strong EW and DEW, will be very hard to damage.Future more, if comes to WVR, we can't rule out the possibility of direct energy weapon on the J-36.