Chengdu next gen combat aircraft (?J-36) thread

minime

Junior Member
Registered Member
Nah, there isn't a way a F-16 can see it to begin with. Not just due to stealth but also EW.

Strong aerospace performance is intended to help it in the penetration role, not make it some sort of dogfight specialist. That it can still use it's specs, stealth and EW to dismantle old fighters in wvr is a coincidence, not it's main function.
According to Yankee & Shilao, due to the 3rd engine, J-36 EW sit between J16-D and Y-9 EW variant.
So I think J-36 can burn through 4 gen fighter avionic render their missile even gun useless in WVR dogfight.
 

Brainsuker

Junior Member
Registered Member
What about an air based drone carrier that can fly fast and deploy CCAs? In fact isn’t this something the J-36 can do with large weaponsbay? Carry four CCAs in the bay and let them go forth into enemy territory while loitering from behind.

What if the role is to target B-21, when it refueling in some kind of air-base before it approach China mainland to deliver it's baggage?
 

minime

Junior Member
Registered Member
According to Yankee & Shilao, due to the 3rd engine, J-36 EW sit between J16-D and Y-9 EW variant.
So I think J-36 can burn through 4 gen fighter avionic render their missile even gun useless in WVR dogfight.
Future more, if comes to WVR, we can't rule out the possibility of direct energy weapon on the J-36.
 

BillRamengod

Junior Member
Registered Member
11324d3f6f37d9e95fa53c12a4f99d15432486265.jpg9e22e042ce0d1fb9af2251a68d05e6ca432486265.jpgdf668b9c8999481f1404a8289d80c09e432486265.jpg


A bilibili user name @兰墨飞花 posted his own mesurement:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"
Estimated length 24 metres
Wingspan estimated at 21 metres.
Maximum take-off weight estimated at 44_50 tonnes
Maximum speed is estimated at Mach 3-4.
Front landing gear on two wheels
Rear landing gear two wheels front and rear
Diamond-shaped, large-sidebar, lozenge-shaped, droop-less layout
10 movable flaps, (may be 4 full-action or 10 full-action)
Three engines, three air intakes, two CARET intakes in the lower jaw and one DCI intake in the dorsum
2D TVC nozzles.
Extra-large, extra-long bomb bay.
"

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

As you can see j36`s bomb bay so big that even can carry two yj21 anti-ship missle

that is crazy
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
View attachment 142062View attachment 142063View attachment 142064


A bilibili user name @兰墨飞花 posted his own mesurement:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"
Estimated length 24 metres
Wingspan estimated at 21 metres.
Maximum take-off weight estimated at 44_50 tonnes
Maximum speed is estimated at Mach 3-4.
Front landing gear on two wheels
Rear landing gear two wheels front and rear
Diamond-shaped, large-sidebar, lozenge-shaped, droop-less layout
10 movable flaps, (may be 4 full-action or 10 full-action)
Three engines, three air intakes, two CARET intakes in the lower jaw and one DCI intake in the dorsum
2D TVC nozzles.
Extra-large, extra-long bomb bay.
"

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

As you can see j36`s bomb bay so big that even can carry two yj21 anti-ship missle

that is crazy

The scaled image comparison between the two is a good effort, but much of the rest of the details are somewhat doubtful.

In particular, depicting J-20 as being able to carry eight folded wing PL-15s is rather confusing.
The idea of J-36 being able to accommodate two KD-21s internally is also a bit doubtful, particularly in terms of the width of the J-36's weapons bay.


The idea of J-36 being a Mach 3-4 aircraft is also a bit overambitious and needs more than eyeballing its aerodynamics.
 

BillRamengod

Junior Member
Registered Member
The scaled image comparison between the two is a good effort, but much of the rest of the details are somewhat doubtful.

In particular, depicting J-20 as being able to carry eight folded wing PL-15s is rather confusing.
The idea of J-36 being able to accommodate two KD-21s internally is also a bit doubtful, particularly in terms of the width of the J-36's weapons bay.


The idea of J-36 being a Mach 3-4 aircraft is also a bit overambitious and needs more than eyeballing its aerodynamics.
i agree with you opinon on j20`s ammo capacity,her bomb bay most likely can carry 6 folded wing PL-15s only.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I consider my payload assumptions to be much more reasonable than the speculative use of GaO in a 2024 aircraft.
We have a Chinese military expert say that GaO is almost ready and that will give China a generation gap vs APG-85. There is no proof that hypersonic missiles will be used on J-3
Are you for real? It is impossible to redesign a 5th gen to incorporate a much larger weapon bay just as it is impossible for 4th gen to be stealth.

if you design a new 5th generation aircraft, you can definitely design a larger weapon bay.

Size of IWB by definition is a design requirement of one aircraft, not of all 6th gen aircraft.

Be careful to understand the difference between what J36 requirements are vs 6th gen of another country.
"Marketing terms" have meaning and value so long as people use them. People are asking what '6th gen' means. I am sharing my view.


The PLAAF disagrees. The PLAAF sees collaboration with UCAV as a common feature of 5th and 6th gen and even advanced 4.5th gen. See latest Shilao & co. podcast.

nothing they said actually contradicts what I have said. 6th gen will have unrivaled level of responsibilities leading both itself and a fleet of drones.

everything is does become more powerful and amplified with a bunch of drones.
I think you will find few voices on this forum as informed and as reasoned as mine.
No, I have been around for a while and it will be best if you keep calm and do a little less hash tagging and flag waving.

Why do we assume that china's 6th gen will do the same as the us 6th gen? Well, us aim to control the battlefield because they have offensive minded. While china is a defensive minded. So why not make a platform to disturb the enemy web instead, so us wont be able to complete their formation? So maybe this j36 is the NGAD counter and not another NGAD?
J36 brings many additional capabilities. Like B21 hunting, attacking Guam, Australia and Diego Garcia. Coordinating attacks on carrier groups that are more than 2000 km out. Think hard about these missions and what level of force package you need.

this doesn’t mean it can’t do solo missions but just that when facing strong adversaries, it needs help and there are many assets that can aid it.
After closer inspection and more accurate calculations, the J-36 has a wing area of 170m2!

Strangely enough, its length and width are (almost) the same! The difference should be no more than 0.5m!
That is very impressive. The amount of fuel it can hold in those wings once you can use thin T1000 level CFRP. The range is something you can dream on.
The PLAAF would be a sad and pathetic force if its entire group of aircraft breaks down because one J-36 is taken down.

Its an American caricature that Chinese untermensch pilots lacks initiatives, can't do anything without direct orders, and needs constant micromanagement from a central node.

The speed is used to increase the energy, range, and probability of kill of your own missiles while shrinking the no escape zone of your enemy's missile.
The UCAVs are unmanned by definition. So I don’t get the pilot part of your response. They are also smaller due to the lower cost nature. They simply do not have the interior space to have same level of electric power generation needed to replace J36.

J36 can still be the launcher of missiles but it doesn’t need to be at the front. It has more important tasks to do. It’s controlling many UCAVs.

can it perform the task individually? Probably, but why not utilize the surrounding assets?
To compare the Tupolev 22 M3 has a wing area of 183 m2 for a maximum takeoff weight of 130 t. This aircraft has two turbojets with 50t of total thrust with afterburner. The J36 if equipped with WS15 would be at about 54 t of maximum thrust. As the J36 is a priori a fighter, and, to maintain maneuverability, we can estimate its total takeoff weight at about 75-85t and a dry weight of 35t...
Very important to consider here. I would say 60t is more likely for now but it can go up further as engine enhancement and material science improvement take place over time.

the range on this thing will be huge and the loiter time is extensive.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
The scaled image comparison between the two is a good effort, but much of the rest of the details are somewhat doubtful.

In particular, depicting J-20 as being able to carry eight folded wing PL-15s is rather confusing.
The idea of J-36 being able to accommodate two KD-21s internally is also a bit doubtful, particularly in terms of the width of the J-36's weapons bay.


The idea of J-36 being a Mach 3-4 aircraft is also a bit overambitious and needs more than eyeballing its aerodynamics.
Right, people need to be a little more cautious on what J36 itself will carry and how fast it will fly. These things affect range of the aircraft and PLA will likely aim for best compromise.
Future more, if comes to WVR, we can't rule out the possibility of direct energy weapon on the J-36.
yes, DEW is something that J36 has to be designed to accommodate even if it’s not necessarily there in day 1. J36 through high altitude, high speed flying, low observability, strong EW and DEW, will be very hard to damage.

and that’s the point, you want these force multipliers to be around
 
Top