Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
You addressed it like Trump addressing a question he had no idea how to answer. Just because you said something on a subject doesn't mean you've made a valid point. "It's over." and "anything can happen." are opposites no matter how much you deny that you contradicted yourself. "Obliterated," "pretty much destroyed" and "not really destroyed" are opposites no matter how much you deny that you contradicted yourself.
The reason is that I disagree with your premature assessments and absolutely childish use of exaggerated terms like "destroyed" and "oliterated." The adult assessment would have been that Harris looked somewhat better in the debate, however, so did Hillary so whether Harris can find something that separates herself from Hillary's ultimate path to defeat will remain to be seen.
Yup, that's me proving that:
1. You have no idea what "destroyed" means even though you pepper it into the conversation for dramatic flair.
2. Harris is not doing anything to Trump that Hillary didn't so it would be very premature to give her the edge.
These are consistent with the statement that I do not believe in polls because the polls heavily favored Hillary just like they do Harris now and I don't think either edge is reliable or accurate.
Last edited:
A wedding photo from over a decade ago.
From left to right in the photo, American Superhero Orange Man, Hillary, Wild Bill, and Melania the Gold Digger.
I believed Trump will win..
It will be a replay of Clinton vs trump back in 2016..
Clinton has the support of women and minority voters but it still not enough to defeat Trump.
This time you will see more white men turnout than ever before to vote for the orange .
Orange is bad for China, but good for Russia.
It will be a replay of Clinton vs trump back in 2016..
Clinton has the support of women and minority voters but it still not enough to defeat Trump.
This time you will see more white men turnout than ever before to vote for the orange .
Orange is bad for China, but good for Russia.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
LOL That's the propaganda department equivalent of the USAF's $90K bag of bolts purchase.
Wasn't bad for China last time. Showed us the path to tech indigenization, lost a trade war to us ending America's hegemonic status (hegemons aren't even supposed to be challengeable not to mention losing), started a tech war they can't win, botched COVID response, etc...
That's not to say Harris is bad for China either; same old same old with her. It's basically the US picking if it wants to get knocked out or choked out.
Something people are not really realising yet is that India is starting to soften its attitude toward China and Chinese investments
A lot of rumours and hints that it's reversing course
This is because they realised they can't do without Chinese expertise in technology and manufacturing after the lackluster Make In India initiative
A lot of rumours and hints that it's reversing course
This is because they realised they can't do without Chinese expertise in technology and manufacturing after the lackluster Make In India initiative
Well it's complicated, you can say that India wants Chinese FDI and yet:
trump said he will impose 60% tariff on China. Let see if it will dent China's export, GDP and other economic metrics.
If it doesn't and still continue to pose good economic numbers, then I am impressed.
India wants the technological and industrial know-how from China's big companies..
