The concept of a "sacred war" traces rather to the USSR and CPC during ww2, what is referred to as holy in this situation is not any religious God, but human spirit itself.A Sino-NATO holy war would only benefit the Indians.
And the concept of waging a holy war is much more native to the monotheistic West than China.
In this last throes of the AngSax empire, the world is truly fortunate to have a clear headed Chinese leadership...
A fascist is identified by his lack of human behavior, this was evident in nazi Germany and Japan back then and today is evident in Israel and some other ideological doctrines from the west as well.
When a civilized military wages a sacred war against the fascist, it is qualified by the fact that there is only destruction of their military targets, and the individual fascist foot soldier and his supporters are always given a chance to redeem themselves, while being held in humane conditions. Neither China nor USSR committed wanton massacre on any of the captured IJA/German/American soldiers in the major wars of the 1930-1950 period.
That is what makes us different from them, and also the moral qualifier that makes it imperative to use arms to defeat and forcibly re-educate evil.