Miscellaneous News

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
For military it's a combination of both, always use consumer PPP for personnel costs but for equipment it depends on the country. For a country that imports all its weapons from the West (e.g. Saudi) then use nominal for equipment. For a country like China then use PPPi for equipment. For India it would be a blend. Of course this omits R&D and military construction. Operations cost is I suspect mainly fuel so use nominal.
The big difference is whether a country has universal healthcare and education, or only healthcare and education for military servicemembers like citizens vs civilians in Starship Troopers.
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Apparently, miss wannabe Jewish Zionist was sexually assaulted by the chosen people of Zionist Israel. As horrible as rape is, I feel no sympathy for her nor her idiot mother who betrayed their roots to fight for a white supremacist genocidal coloniser state. Her mother who told “you Chinese have to help”.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This is the real reason why the U.S. is making a big show of wanting reconciliation with China whilst at the same time trying to gang up against China. They’re trying to bully China into lifting sanctions on gallium because without rare earths, the U.S. can’t produce any of these wunderwaffen in the lead up to war against Iran and Russia.
 

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
Am I incorrect for saying that if you account for inflation, cost of goods/services and labor, etc., then the Chinese military s̶p̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ funding in real numbers is higher than the US'? i.e. $2 in China can buy more than $5 in US.

In simple layman terms, yes, it seems apparent that the PLA gets a bigger bang for the buck for each $1 spent.

Those Pentagon audit reports are like completely whacko.

:oops::D
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is yet evidence no. 748583847 of how the Anglo have no principles and will say and do anything to get an advantage, they behave as the stereotypical Jews of antisemitic propaganda.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In line with the U.S. crying about Chinese spying and cyber attacks, they and the five eyes are the most obsessive about spying on everyone.
In simple layman terms, yes, it seems apparent that the PLA gets a bigger bang for the buck for each $1 spent.

Those Pentagon audit reports are like completely whacko.

:oops::D
it also helps that the PLA has access to the lions share of the rare earths of the world.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Dugin gives China his seal of approval.
I propose an alternative vision for Russia: rather than a seperate pole, Russia becomes china‘s right hand man when contending with the west, what Britain is to the U.S.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The anglos have determined that the entire world must burn if they cannot remain the sole superpower. Makes sense why they were promoting conscription last week across the five eyes.
 
Last edited:

MixedReality

Junior Member
Registered Member
Russia and China to collaborate on confronting US bioweapons activities.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Good. Please look into investigating Fort Detrick and the initial outbreaks of Covid in the US and Europe before it appeared in China.

Glad to see both Russia and China are now collaborating on the threat of US bioweapons. Best response by Russia and China is to develop their own bioweapons instead of asking the US to abaondon their bioweapons program. Just like the best response to US nuclear weapons was to develop your own nuclear weapons instead of asking the US to abandon its nuclear weapons. Only when Russia and China develop bioweapons will the US come to the table to discuss the issue and come to an agreement. As long as they have an advantage they won’t talk.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
If this disaster spreads from the Ohio River downstream to the Mississippi and contaminates the US breadbasket, China should blanket ban all agricultural imports from that region.
View attachment 107318

Make them undergo inspection by Chinese authorities before selling in China. Good way to repay the US for their Xinjiang ban. Turnabout is fair play.

It's in the water now...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Last year, alarm bells finally started to ring in Iowa when the state Cancer Registry reported that its citizens were suffering with the second-highest incidence of cancer in the US. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
also found that in five other Corn Belt states cancer further increased
, even as the overall cancer in the US
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
d.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
For military it's a combination of both, always use consumer PPP for personnel costs but for equipment it depends on the country. For a country that imports all its weapons from the West (e.g. Saudi) then use nominal for equipment. For a country like China then use PPPi for equipment. For India it would be a blend. Of course this omits R&D and military construction. Operations cost is I suspect mainly fuel so use nominal.

For comparing military spending, there's a methodology below on why the Industrial Price Index (Industrial PPP) is more accurate than the Consumer Price Index (Consumer PPP).

Source
acquisitiontalk.com/2019/01/how-large-is-military-spending-in-the-us-and-china
 
Top