TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
Wish they mounted a decent auto cannon on it. As it is its a decent apc but if they added a remote 30 or 40mm cannon they would have a monster IFV.
Wish they mounted a decent auto cannon on it. As it is its a decent apc but if they added a remote 30 or 40mm cannon they would have a monster IFV.
Well considering the Merkeva already carries a full Tank turret with a 120mm gun space for infantry and crew.. I think they could do it.LOL...I agreed. Than again we might be putting a lot of pressure on that chassis and transmission. It's already carrying troops and equipment, not to mention it has the same hull as the Merkava tank.
Wiki sais it carriers the same engine as the Mk3.Just curious...does the Namer troop carrier has the same engine as the Merkava Mk4? I like it...looks to be designed specifically for desert terrain heavily armored troop carrier or APC.
Wiki sais it carriers the same engine as the Mk3.
On the armament side, I guess the Namer right now is designed specificly for assymetric, urban ops like Gaza. So an autocannon is probably not high on the priority list. I guess they'd tather use the space for troops and supplies. Btw, I think the Namer has 60t as it is already. The elimination of the tank turret allowed for a lot of additional armor on the vehicle.
I still think 40mm smart grnades would do nicely.
For proper mechanized combat, which seems unlikly for the IDF at this time, that really would make one heck of an IFV, though.
While the russians came up with heavily upgunned IFVs after chechnya, I don't think that's the solution Israel wants to, or should, emulate for their current conflicts.
Well considering the Merkeva already carries a full Tank turret with a 120mm gun space for infantry and crew.. I think they could do it.