World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

ManilaBoy45

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Jocelyn R. Uy/Tarra Quismundo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
Publication Date : 05-12-2012

The Philippine Bureau of Immigration (BI) yesterday said it had started implementing an order to stop stamping Chinese passports that bear a map of China extending its territory to include disputed islands in the South China Sea (also known in Philippines as West Philippine Sea).

In a memorandum, Immigration Commissioner Ricardo David Jr. directed all field offices and ports of entry nationwide to instead place their stamps on the back page of a Chinese national’s visa application form.

The said visa application form should be attached to the passport of the holder upon his or her arrival in a Philippine port of entry and whenever he or she does business in any of the bureau's field offices.
 
Last edited:

Franklin

Captain
The Syrian civil war maybe nearing its end game.

Syria loads chemical weapons into bombs; military awaits Assad's order

The Syrian military is prepared to use chemical weapons against its own people and is awaiting final orders from President Bashar Assad, U.S. officials told NBC News on Wednesday.

The military has loaded the precursor chemicals for sarin, a deadly nerve gas, into aerial bombs that could be dropped onto the Syrian people from dozens of fighter-bombers, the officials said.

As recently as Tuesday, officials had said there was as yet no evidence that the process of mixing the "precursor" chemicals had begun. But Wednesday, they said their worst fears had been confirmed: The nerve agents were locked and loaded inside the bombs.

Sarin is an extraordinarily lethal agent. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's forces killed 5,000 Kurds with a single sarin attack on Halabja in 1988.

U.S. officials stressed that as of now, the sarin bombs hadn't been loaded onto planes and that Assad hadn't issued a final order to use them. But if he does, one of the officials said, "there's little the outside world can do to stop it."

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton reiterated U.S. warnings to Assad not to use chemical weapons, saying he would be crossing "a red line" if he did so.

Speaking Wednesday at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Clinton said the Syrian government was on the brink of collapse, raising the prospect that "an increasingly desperate Assad regime" might turn to chemical weapons or that the banned weapons could fall into other hands.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaking Wednesday at NATO headquarters in Brussels, said the fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad's government was "inevitable."

"Ultimately, what we should be thinking about is a political transition in Syria and one that should start as soon as possible," Clinton said. "We believe their fall is inevitable. It is just a question of how many people have to die before that occurs."

Aides told NBC News that Clinton was expected next week to officially recognize the main opposition movement, the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, with which she is scheduled to meet in Morocco. Britain, France, Turkey and some key Arab leaders have already recognized the opposition.

Fighting intensified Wednesday in the 21-month civil war, which has left 40,000 people dead. The U.N. withdrew its personnel from Damascus, saying conditions were too dangerous.

The government said this week that it wouldn't use chemical weapons on its own people after President Barack Obama warned that doing so would be "totally unacceptable."

But U.S. officials said this week that the government had ordered its Chemical Weapons Corps to "be prepared," which Washington interpreted as a directive to begin bringing together the components needed to weaponize Syria's chemical stockpiles.

U.S. officials had long believed that the Syrian government was stockpiling the banned chemical weapons before it acknowledged possessing them this summer.

NBC News reported in July that U.S. intelligence agencies believed that in addition to sarin, Syria had access to tabun, a chemical nerve agent, as well as traditional chemical weapons like mustard gas and hydrogen cyanide.

Officials told NBC News at the time that the Syrian government was moving the outlawed weapons around the country, leaving foreign intelligence agencies unsure where they might end up.

Syria is one of only seven nations that hasn't ratified the 1992 Chemical Weapons Convention, the arms control agreement that outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of such weapons.

Bombshells filled with chemicals can be carried by Syrian Air Force fighter-bombers, in particular Sukhoi-22/20, MiG-23 and Sukhoi-24 aircraft. In addition, some reports indicate that unguided short-range Frog-7 artillery rockets may be capable of carrying chemical payloads.

In terms of longer-range delivery systems, Syria has a few dozen SS-21 ballistic missiles with a maximum range of 72 miles; 200 Scud-Bs, with a maximum range of 180 miles; and 60 to 120 Scud-Cs, with a maximum range of 300 miles, all of which are mobile and are capable of carrying chemical weapons, according U.S. intelligence officials.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Thousands of US troops arrive near Syrian shore on USS Eisenhower

The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention.

While the Obama administration has not announced any sort of American-led military intervention in the war-torn country, the US is now ready to launch such action “within days” if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad decides to use chemical weapons against the opposition, the Times reports.

Some have suggested that the Assad regime may use chemical weapons against the opposition fighters in the coming days or weeks.

The arrival of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, one of the 11 US Navy aircraft carriers that has the capacity to hold thousands of men, is now stationed at the coast of Syria, DEBKAfile reports. The aircraft carrier joined the USS Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group, which holds about 2,500 Marines.

“We have (US) special operations forces at the right posture, they don’t have to be sent,” an unnamed US official told The Australian, which suggested that US military troops are already near Syria and ready to intervene in the conflict, if necessary.

If the US decides to intervene militarily in Syria, it now has at its disposal 10,000 fighting men, 17 warships, 70 fighter-bombers, 10 destroyers and frigates and a guided military cruises. Some of the vessels are also equipped with Aegis missile interceptors to shoot down any missiles Syria might have at hand, according to DEBKAfile.

“The muscle is already there to be flexed,” a US official told the London Times about the US military’s presence outside of Syria. “It’s premature to say what could happen if a decision is made to intervene. That hasn’t taken shape, we’ve not reached that kind of decision. There are a lot of options, but it [military action] could be launched rapidly, within days.”

The move comes after NATO made a significant strategic decision Tuesday to deploy Patriot Air and Missile Defense Systems in Turkey on the border of Syria where opposition groups have the stronghold. The defense would be able to protect Turkey from potential Syrian missiles that could contain chemical weapons, as well as intimidate Syrian Air Force pilots from bombing the northern Syria border towns, which the armed rebels control. Syria is thought to have about 700 missiles.

“The protection from NATO will be three dimensional; one is the short-range Patriots, the second is the middle-range Terminal High Altitude Air Defense [THAD] system and the last is the AEGIS system, which counters missiles that can reach outside the atmosphere,” Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said.

DEBKAfile’s anonymous military sources claim the THAD and Aegis arrived at the Syrian coast aboard the USS Eisenhower.

“The United States now stands ready for direct military intervention in the Syrian conflict when the weather permits,” the news source wrote.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Thousands of US troops arrive near Syrian shore on USS Eisenhower

The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention.

Huh??

Ahh didn't know thwre were 8,000 men on the IKE..I think they mean the whole battle group...there are about 4700 on the IKE.

The IKE has 4 Hornet squadrons, 1 Prowler squadron, 1 Hawkeye squadron and two helo squadrons.. for about 65 aircraft..total of which about 42 are fighters..

The IKE is in transit home to Norfolk VA for Christmas and to get it's flight deck resurfaced.. she will return to the Persian Gulf region in FEB or March..And the name of the carrier in question is USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69)..not USS Eisenhower.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The Navy has directed the temporary return of the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower(CVN 69) from her current overseas deployment, allowing the ship to return home for two months before sending it back to the Middle East region.
The unusual move is being made to accommodate delays due to emergent repair work on USS Nimitz (CVN 68). The Everett, Wash.-based carrier was expected to deploy to the region to relieve Eisenhower early next year. Nimitz is now expected to deploy once repair work is complete.
Bringing Eisenhower back home to its homeport in Norfolk, Va. in December will permit the Navy to resurface the ship's flight deck and make it available to return and remain in the Middle East region for several more months. This decision also provides the ship's crew a welcome holiday respite from what will become nearly 10 months on station.
"Our Navy is in high demand operating forward all over the world," said Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert. "And our Sailors, civilians and their families are doing a great job meeting that demand. Expanded maintenance work on USS Nimitz was unpredictable and has required us to establish a carrier schedule that satisfies our commitments overseas and most importantly is mindful of the stress on our Navy family. This is the right thing to do."
The John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, currently deployed to the region, will continue providing carrier presence in the CENTCOM Area of Responsibility. Stennis departed its homeport of Bremerton in August.
 

icbeodragon

Junior Member
Is it surprising that the media manipulates and lies just so people notice their headlines?

Take a look at this.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The subway platform was full of people and no one helped the guy. Remember all the heat China got from the media when that little girl in China was hit by multiple cars and no one did anything? You're not hearing any vilifying here except towards the photographer.

You can read it in the comments, they seem to be specifically targeted at the reporter rather than the unnamed bystanders.

As for why there is not so much criticism of the bystanders?

This one could have entailed a person to risk their life (risk being pulled down), then there is just the shock of seeing this happen in an otherwise normal day, it can paralyze people.

This all happened in very little time. Could the man have been saved by a clear thinking and quick acting individual? Very likely, does this count as callous disregard because people did not help in the window of time there was? Not necessarily.

What could be people shocked and paralyzed/frozen up by the situation at hand (more normal than you think considering this is not something they expect to happen in their everyday life), cannot necessarily be considered disregard.

I know i'd never want to be put into that situation in any case, it is a nightmare. That is probably why readers are tending to be less critical towards the bystanders, while they are more critical towards the photographer who snapped the photos and has gained some small amount of financial benefit from the event by choosing to sell them.

You can of course read his take of the events above, and there are arguments for publishing the photos that could be considered compelling for provoking public discussion (of course not taking into account basic empathy and morals that say otherwise).

Of course then there is the suspected murderer who is currently in custody.

I think a good phrase for this is the 'deer in the headlights' reaction? might be a bit different as it isn't being paralyzed by personal fear but by the events that occur.

Oh yes, how dare the Chinese put a map of their country on their passports. That is just so unprecedented and insulting to every other nation on earth. :rolleyes:

Well that begs the question. :)

But lets stop with that, no use getting into arguments over sovereignty here, its happening on the international level and the various reactions are self-evident of how it is viewed, and we aren't going to change that. :p
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
Yep and this happened on Time Square, the busiest subway station in the US. The photographer claims he flash 49 times to alert the train. Funny he had time to flash his camera 49 times but yet could not find time to help the victim up the platform.


More like he took 49 photos with flash on, that is why he remembered how many times he flashed( under extreme pressure). Also explains why New York Post's has such "perfect" pic with every thing right on (since there were 49 pics to choose from).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Han could have survived if he stayed down between the tracks or climbed out from the other side, that's why Mr. Han's death is partially MTA's fault. MTA done nothing to inform commuters how to properly react in this type of situation. They could have easily replaced some of stupid "want a better sex life-call 1800-DR.Zizmor" poster ads with diagrammed instructions ( in various languages )teaching New Yorkers the proper responses. A life was lost when it could have been saved.

Perhaps, but even if MTA did something to educate commuters about how to survive in a situation like that, most people would probably forget about it and panic by trying to climb out of the trench as fast as possible. It's hard to tell what any human reaction would be in that kind of circumstance.
 

icbeodragon

Junior Member
Coming Soon, Visa-Free Beijing Visits
Good news for travelers who have always wanted to see the Chinese capital, just not badly enough to go through all the trouble of getting a visa: Starting New Year’s Day, foreigners will be allowed to stay in Beijing without a visa for 72 hours.
The new rule, hinted at back in May, is aimed at making tourism a “strategic pillar of the economy,” the state-run China Daily said, citing the Beijing Tourism Administration.

The visa-free offer is only available to passengers from a list of 45 approved countries who are in transit, meaning travelers will have to show they have a plane ticket to a third country before being allowed out of the airport and into Beijing. The U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand and most of Europe are on the approved list.

By allowing foreign visitors to deplane with only a passport for a full three days, Beijing will be one-upping rival Shanghai, which for years has offered 48 hours of visa-free roaming to foreign visitors.

The southern island province of Hainan, sometimes optimistically referred to by tourism authorities as “China’s Hawaii,” offers 21 days without a visa, but only for people who travel with tour groups.

Shanghai, which is now contemplating extending its visa-free rule to 72 hours, hasn’t seen much of a tourist windfall from its current policy. Less than 3,000 visitors took advantage of the offer in 2010, according to the state-run Shanghai Daily.

But with two world-class attractions in the Forbidden City and the Great Wall, Beijing is arguably a much bigger draw for leisure tourists, and the extra 24 hours could make a big difference. The allotted three days is just about enough time to swing by the monumental must-sees, eat a helping or two of Peking duck, do a little shopping and maybe sneak in a stroll through the city’s charming hutong.

The potential boost to Beijing’s tourism sector is obvious. Beijing currently gets about 5 million foreign visitors a year, and each spends about $1000, state media said. According to Airports Council International, nearly 47 million people passed through Beijing International Airport between January and October, making it the second-busiest airport in the world after Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson.

Beijing Jiaotong University tourism professor Zhang Hui, quoted in China Daily, called the visa waiver a “giant step forward” that would be of particular benefit to tour companies targeting businessmen.

“Those on business trips usually don’t have sightseeing plans, so they’re free to explore when they have time,” Zhang told the newspaper. “However, the relatively tight visa restrictions China now adopts only put potential visitors off.”

State media didn’t say why Beijing decided to limit the visa-free period to 72 hours, though China Real Time can’t help but wonder if they might have been thinking of the famous Benjamin Franklin quip: “Fish and visitors stink after three days.”

Beijing wants tourist money! ;)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
You can read it in the comments, they seem to be specifically targeted at the reporter rather than the unnamed bystanders.

As for why there is not so much criticism of the bystanders?

This one could have entailed a person to risk their life (risk being pulled down), then there is just the shock of seeing this happen in an otherwise normal day, it can paralyze people.

This all happened in very little time. Could the man have been saved by a clear thinking and quick acting individual? Very likely, does this count as callous disregard because people did not help in the window of time there was? Not necessarily.

What could be people shocked and paralyzed/frozen up by the situation at hand (more normal than you think considering this is not something they expect to happen in their everyday life), cannot necessarily be considered disregard.

I know i'd never want to be put into that situation in any case, it is a nightmare. That is probably why readers are tending to be less critical towards the bystanders, while they are more critical towards the photographer who snapped the photos and has gained some small amount of financial benefit from the event by choosing to sell them.

You can of course read his take of the events above, and there are arguments for publishing the photos that could be considered compelling for provoking public discussion (of course not taking into account basic empathy and morals that say otherwise).

Of course then there is the suspected murderer who is currently in custody.

I think a good phrase for this is the 'deer in the headlights' reaction? might be a bit different as it isn't being paralyzed by personal fear but by the events that occur.

Never said they had to do anything. If it were China, there would be vilifying and generalizing. That little girl in China that was hit multiple times by cars... No one witnessed the girl being hit so it would be an odd sight if you walked by and didn't know what happened. Excuses can be made the same yet you don't see any blanket generalizations of the NY incident. The media called Chinese racists because a big deal was made about the British man in China caught on video raping a Chinese girl in public and then was beaten up. Another hypocrisy because that girl being hit, the media condemned all of China like they were the ones to bring attention and no Chinese cared until they brought it up. No, how would the media get this footage first to bring attention. It's because it was already stirring anger in China well before the media. Or how about how the media made all Chinese racists because of individual comments made on the internet. You see racist comments in the US and Great Britain all the time on the internet yet no blanket generalization. So if the Chinese can be vilified for no one helping that little girl hit by cars, the same can be said more because people saw what happened in New York and did nothing. Besides other photos show the man that died... the train was no where near and still no one helped and the photographer just took pictures of him sitting on his but on the tracks gathering himself.
 
Last edited:

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
C'mon guys...these sort of incidents take place the all over the World. This one incident got the publicity because it is in NYC.

Here's a few sorrowful stories..

[h=3]
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
[/h]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
I bet many assumed she was obviously and visibly injured. I know that's what i'd assume.

Thats the first i've heard of such a story and if it went as you've said I struggle to see any reputable newspaper publishing even editorials calling Chinese racists for that action alone. Are you talking about the Epoch times or something like that?



The articles I recall reading about this pointed out that it was drawing widespread criticism within China, and media usually doesn't have the leeway to condemn actions of such scope except in editorials, which are classified as opinion pieces and not news (as we have seen enforced in this very thread).

Unlike the NY incident where people witnessed what happened... I saw the video of the little girl being hit and no one witnessed it happen except maybe the first driver that hit her. I'm not making excuses for why no one helped the little girl. I'm pointing how excuses can be made just like ignoring to help the man killed by a NY subway. People making excuses while charging there's no excuse for the other? One can spin and speculate for one but not the other? Pretty hypocritical. The media made it that people saw the girl being hit and no one did anything. From the video it just looked like a lump of clothes. I know a police officer and he told me there was an incident where a man was hit and run by a car laying in the street and no one called the police. The people in the neighborhood did nothing and children even started playing poking sticks at the man who eventually died only after a police car drove by and spotted him. So who was obviously injured and no one did anything?

British man raping a Chinese girl in public? It was either the Telegraph or Guardian that wrote it was racism when it went viral in China. They didn't report the incident at all. It was the reaction to the incident that was the story to which they first reported it. The media will report and even show the video of the girl being hit by a car but not as much about the British man raping a Chinese girl in public except after all the outrage in China over it just to say Chinese are racists to make a big deal over it being a British man. Show a child being hit by a car but not a man raping a woman? And it was a bad telephone camera video that showed nothing explicit. It was also one of them that started the story of racist postings on the internet in China as a blanket charge Chinese were racists. Pretty hypocritical.

Widespread criticism in China? That's not what the outside media was painting it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top