AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
They're already spinning back on the pivot. Any talk of a NATO for Asia is more a fantasy for the wishful thinkers. Asia is not like Europe. Obama's mistake is he was arrogant enough to think he can herd cats. Petty nationalism rules Asia and that how it's been for centuries. Everyone else in Asia wasn't surprise that Filipino forces killed an unarmed fisherman over territorial claims. Obama was surprised that countries not involving China would have problems with one another. Japan boldly making revisionist comments like they've never done before since their surrender shows Obama carelessly didn't entertain the macro ramifications of his pivot against China.
Teasing an arms race hasn't had the intended effect either. It might be one of those absurdities of taunting China and then actually expecting China not to respond in kind. Just look at how China's hypersonic test is treated like China violated the law. Oh... the pressure thing again thinking China would yield under it. Notice a nuclear arms race hasn't been talked about much? It's been pretty much all a conventional "Cold War." Japan going nuclear will most likely spur South Korea to go nuclear and not because of fear of China. North Korea will most likely gain support from China. Everyone will have their own nuclear policy and not one under the US's control. China will of course make plenty more especially if there were an Asian NATO. How many countries want to be nuked by China because they become a legitimate target regardless if they don't have nukes since being part of a NATO-type alliance? And when you have Japan and the Philippines exploiting US protection to poke China in the eye, how would another country in a military alliance feel that they can get attacked or even nuked for that?
The US, Japan, and South Korea were suppose to be in an unofficial trilateral alliance and then Japanese nationalism reared its ugly head offending South Korea. I read that the US got South Korea back on board and then NHK made those comfort women comments. Last week John Kerry declared the US will defend Japan against China and then NHK charges the Nanking Massacre was a lie. See a pattern?
Teasing an arms race hasn't had the intended effect either. It might be one of those absurdities of taunting China and then actually expecting China not to respond in kind. Just look at how China's hypersonic test is treated like China violated the law. Oh... the pressure thing again thinking China would yield under it. Notice a nuclear arms race hasn't been talked about much? It's been pretty much all a conventional "Cold War." Japan going nuclear will most likely spur South Korea to go nuclear and not because of fear of China. North Korea will most likely gain support from China. Everyone will have their own nuclear policy and not one under the US's control. China will of course make plenty more especially if there were an Asian NATO. How many countries want to be nuked by China because they become a legitimate target regardless if they don't have nukes since being part of a NATO-type alliance? And when you have Japan and the Philippines exploiting US protection to poke China in the eye, how would another country in a military alliance feel that they can get attacked or even nuked for that?
The US, Japan, and South Korea were suppose to be in an unofficial trilateral alliance and then Japanese nationalism reared its ugly head offending South Korea. I read that the US got South Korea back on board and then NHK made those comfort women comments. Last week John Kerry declared the US will defend Japan against China and then NHK charges the Nanking Massacre was a lie. See a pattern?
Last edited: