What should China's military research focus on in the future?
- Thread starter Autumn Child
- Start date
Not a complete list, but some specifics to watch out for.
Nuclear Subs --- HTGR reactors with pump jet propulsion to create fast ultra quiet nuclear subs. Currently the state of the art in propulsion is held by the UK's Trafalgar and Astute class of subs, as well as the Sea Wolf. The PLAN should study the Astute class as a model for future nuclear subs.
Diesel subs --- Fuel cell propulsion. The PLAN should study the U-212 and 214s as the model for its next diesel subs.
Surface ships --- COGAS (Combined Gas Turbine with Steam propulsion). This is also known as recyclable gas turbines. Look to the UK's Type 45 warship. Also fuel cell hybrid propulsion.
Aircraft --- AESA in all fields. Sensor fusion.
National/Strategic --- Development of synthetic fuel and fuel cell technology. Nuclear energy, using small and safe reactors. China should get out of the petroleum habit.
Nuclear Subs --- HTGR reactors with pump jet propulsion to create fast ultra quiet nuclear subs. Currently the state of the art in propulsion is held by the UK's Trafalgar and Astute class of subs, as well as the Sea Wolf. The PLAN should study the Astute class as a model for future nuclear subs.
Diesel subs --- Fuel cell propulsion. The PLAN should study the U-212 and 214s as the model for its next diesel subs.
Surface ships --- COGAS (Combined Gas Turbine with Steam propulsion). This is also known as recyclable gas turbines. Look to the UK's Type 45 warship. Also fuel cell hybrid propulsion.
Aircraft --- AESA in all fields. Sensor fusion.
National/Strategic --- Development of synthetic fuel and fuel cell technology. Nuclear energy, using small and safe reactors. China should get out of the petroleum habit.
RedMercury
Junior Member
qi gong remote viewing espionage and telekinetic assassins. Gay/orgasm bombs. 
How about something in the vicinity of this baby:
The article says that scientists have discovered a way to reverse the "Casimir Effect," a phenomenon that usually causes objects to stick together. By reversing this phenomenon, we can cause small objects to repel from each other on a nano level instead of sticking to each other. I'm curious if the Chinese Navy is aware, or even have researched this technology. I believe this reverse Casimir can be applied to the "mounting points" of Submarine engines to reduce vibration (noise) from the largest source of a submarine's noise pollution.
Peace
The article says that scientists have discovered a way to reverse the "Casimir Effect," a phenomenon that usually causes objects to stick together. By reversing this phenomenon, we can cause small objects to repel from each other on a nano level instead of sticking to each other. I'm curious if the Chinese Navy is aware, or even have researched this technology. I believe this reverse Casimir can be applied to the "mounting points" of Submarine engines to reduce vibration (noise) from the largest source of a submarine's noise pollution.
Peace
Autumn Child
Junior Member
Just wondering about the effectiveness of balistic missiles against a moving target. How practical and feasable is it? Is it even cost effective way to destroy a carrier?
I know alot of people are talking about new chinese ballistic missiles DF-25 fitted with conventional warheads to attack USN carriers. But some defense expert in China is downplaying the missiles' ability to hit a moving target. It will be too easy to detect and evade since it will be launch thousand of kilometre away from the target. Another problem is the cost. they said that it will be a huge waste of resource to use a balistic missiles against moving target compared to when they can just target seaports and airports. It will be more devastating to the enemy.
I know alot of people are talking about new chinese ballistic missiles DF-25 fitted with conventional warheads to attack USN carriers. But some defense expert in China is downplaying the missiles' ability to hit a moving target. It will be too easy to detect and evade since it will be launch thousand of kilometre away from the target. Another problem is the cost. they said that it will be a huge waste of resource to use a balistic missiles against moving target compared to when they can just target seaports and airports. It will be more devastating to the enemy.
I don't know the effectiveness but what I do know is that anti-carrier BM is a successfully completed subsystem (ITA reached in 2006) within the PLA's "995" Project so I guess it can't be just a daydream right?:china:
Last edited:
Very interesting...
Can u post the link where u got this info from? I would love to have a read myself...
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
I wonder if they have one fitted to launch from a submarine. That would be deadly.
(plz warn me if this violate ppl)
People on the forum,
IT is my belief that for chian to be strong, lots of problems has to be solved. IN order to hava sustainable long lasting pwoerufl government, the corrupted governeemnt officials has to be kicked out. The peasnts are growing restless! and they're the backbone of ever country, give tham better LIFE. IT is the chiense governemnt's best interest that it is neccesary for the chiense government to take actions on the needed situations before Developing new technology
for the benefit to chinese community
People on the forum,
IT is my belief that for chian to be strong, lots of problems has to be solved. IN order to hava sustainable long lasting pwoerufl government, the corrupted governeemnt officials has to be kicked out. The peasnts are growing restless! and they're the backbone of ever country, give tham better LIFE. IT is the chiense governemnt's best interest that it is neccesary for the chiense government to take actions on the needed situations before Developing new technology
for the benefit to chinese community