V-280 & other current (non V-22) Tilt Rotor Aircraft

SamuraiBlue

Captain
I believe various navies want an AEW version with a pressurized interior which would benefit the pocket carriers immensely but I do not think the US would start development of such craft due to the fact that it would cut down the large advantage they have owning the E2D Hawkeye on their own supercarriers.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I believe various navies want an AEW version with a pressurized interior which would benefit the pocket carriers immensely but I do not think the US would start development of such craft due to the fact that it would cut down the large advantage they have owning the E2D Hawkeye on their own supercarriers.
The US would need to develop the AEW Osprey or otherr tilt-rotor AEW for the LHD and LHAs...heck even for the San Antonio class.

The U S Navy is going to maintain 8 LHDs and 4 LHAs for the forseeable future. That's 12 vessels that cannot use the E2-D, but that also would really benefit from their own AEW. Heck, te LPDs could use them two...each of the 11 San Antonio class could have two of these available when necessary.

The US Navy could easily establish a squadron of three AEW V-22s for each of the larger LHDs and LHAs.. With those and the aircraft for training and testing, as well as maintenance, and then some for LPD use, they could easily have a build of over 50 such aircraft for the gator Navy alone.

The CVNs would always keep the more capable E-2Ds.

If the US Navy led the way with this, I bet you would see the UK, Australia, Korea, Japan, India, and Brazil all be very interested in a AEW V-22...and produce sales of 50 or more additional aircraft for the foreign market.

That aircraft would be more capable than any helo AEW hey could filed and would be a HUGE assett for those navies and their pocket/VTOL or even STOBAR carriers.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
@Jeff

Does the US LHDs and LHAs really require a tilt rotor AEW consider US Navy Doctrine dictates that the US CBG goes in and secure air superiority before the LHDs and LHA start launch of an amphibious assault?
Sounds redundant for the US Marine corps to make a request for them.
The US Air Force may have use of it for tactical coverage but again they would probably ask the Navy to launch their E2Ds considering the range they have.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
I LIKE that naval variant. I want a ASW and an AEW version of them...pronto!

I believe various navies want an AEW version with a pressurized interior which would benefit the pocket carriers immensely but I do not think the US would start development of such craft due to the fact that it would cut down the large advantage they have owning the E2D Hawkeye on their own supercarriers.
Pressurization allows for more comfortable flight use at altitude.

@Jeff

Does the US LHDs and LHAs really require a tilt rotor AEW consider US Navy Doctrine dictates that the US CBG goes in and secure air superiority before the LHDs and LHA start launch of an amphibious assault?

Sounds redundant for the US Marine corps to make a request for them.

The US Air Force may have use of it for tactical coverage but again they would probably ask the Navy to launch their E2Ds considering the range they have.
They may not currently have a requirement however It may be a wanted option. The F35B is a game changer for LHA and LHD air wings as For the First time they have a Jump Jet that can perform on par with a full fighter jet. We already see the V22 being looked to for a Tanker and gunship adding electronic detection systems either Air to Surface or Air to Air.

Given the Proliferating threat of Ballistic Anti ship missiles having a means of augmenting the CBG with a lower end carrier asset may become a real future option. The USN has already been looking to replace a E2 based hull of the C3 Greyhound with the CMV22 so the possibility is there. A long time want of the Us was to streamline the Air wings of carriers to as few types as possible. one striker, one fighter, One helicopter and one loitering/long range transport type. EV22 would offer that FA18 for the Striker, F35 for fighter SV280 for helicopter and CMV22/EV22for cargo and AEW.

Now then will we see it? Maybe but I am betting it will not be based on the V22B or C but on a future 2020's overhaul I suspect that in the latter half of the 2020's the Navy, Marines and USAF will push for a "Super Osprey" That will combine the size and configuration of the V22 With new Engines and Avionics as well as Adopting the V280's Drive shaft and Rotor tilt system and a Pressurized cabin.
I see a SV280 being a system more for destroyers and ASW as well as Marine missions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
@Jeff

Does the US LHDs and LHAs really require a tilt rotor AEW consider US Navy Doctrine dictates that the US CBG goes in and secure air superiority before the LHDs and LHA start launch of an amphibious assault?

Sounds redundant for the US Marine corps to make a request for them.

The US Air Force may have use of it for tactical coverage but again they would probably ask the Navy to launch their E2Ds considering the range they have.
@SamuraiBlue With the development of the USS America and USS Tripoli as fixed wing centric LHAs, yes, I believe it would be advisable.

The America is supposed to allow the Navy and Marines to operate a large number of F-35Bs in support of an amphibious operation without necessarily having to call on a CVN.

In addition, with the proof of concept of using the LHDs and LHAs as Sea Control carriers when necessary, in that role they would need the AEW capability as well. The whole idea there is to allow those vessels to operate as escort carriers for task forces without the need to tie up a CVN too.
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
seems like Bell keeps wanting to show off it's Dash board display system. It is neat sure but with Lockheed Martin now owning Sikorsky, I would bet that the same dash board will be on the Boeing Sikorsky ( Lockheed Martin) Defiant.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Bell V-280 Tiltrotor Being Prepared For Ground Testing
Feb 3, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
| Aerospace Daily & Defense Report
  • v-280valor-bellhelicopter.jpg

    Bell Helicopter

    AMARILLO, Texas—Bell is preparing its prototype V-280 Valor next-generation tiltrotor for ground-vibration testing as it pushes to achieve a first flight by September of this year.

    The company’s entry for the U.S. Army’s Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstration (JMR-TD) program is now 93% complete and was due to be rolled out of the hangar for the vibration testing during February, Scott Allen, V-280 build team manager, told Aviation Week during a visit here Jan. 31.

    Teams had begun incrementally powering on aircraft systems during December, and were testing the engine starters during the visit. Test instrumentation also has been installed with vibration sensors placed across the airframe and the body of the aircraft.

    “It seems like there is a lot of time between now and September,” Allen said. “There is still a lot of testing to be done so that everything is performing as we planned.”

    Recently the company finished work on a new test stand with funding support from the City of Amarillo’s Economic Development Corporation. This will allow the company to perform high-power engine runs on the V-280 and the
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    Osprey, which also is built at the site.

    Allen noted that the method of 3D design, an approach also taken with Bell’s commercial 505 and 525, meant that assembly had been a painless process. Systems like the auxiliary power unit, installed in a compartment in the upper fuselage and behind the main wing, had been installed in 15 min., Allen said.

    The Valor—what Bell describes as a third-generation tiltrotor—uses the
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    T64-419 engine from the CH-53 to drive the aircraft’s prop-rotors. However, unlike existing tiltrotor aircraft, the engine itself does not tilt, but remains in a horizontal position driving the prop-rotor through a gearbox. This reduces complexity and the need to certify the engine to operate at different angles.

    The prop rotor can be swiveled from 0 deg. at horizontal flight to 95 deg., just beyond the vertical to allow the aircraft to fly backwards out of a landing zone. The positioning of the engines reduces risk to the passengers, who exit from doors on the side of the aircraft.

    Bell also has made use of advanced materials; the straight main wing makes use of a composite call IM10, which is not currently commercially available, while elements of the intakes have been produced using additive manufacturing.

    The JMR-TD flight test program runs through 2019 and coincides with the study into FVL (Future Vertical Lift) Medium, also known as Capability Set 3, which seeks a common, medium-weight rotary-wing airframe for attack/utility and deep attack/penetration missions.

    The helicopter manufacturers are pressing toward first flight in 2017 to prove that their respective configurations are technologically mature enough to enter an FVL acquisition program at Milestone B, the start of full-scale engineering and manufacturing development, instead of a three-year technology maturation phase that could delay service entry from the mid-2020s to early 2030s.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
lest we forget Osprey's little sister.
AW609 prepares for icing trials as flight tests resume

  • 09 FEBRUARY, 2017
  • SOURCE: FLIGHTGLOBAL.COM
  • BY: STEPHEN TRIMBLE
  • WASHINGTON DC


Icing trials will soon begin on Leonardo helicopter division’s AW609 tiltrotor as the programme recovers from a nearly year-long flight test hiatus caused by a fatal crash of the second prototype in October 2015.

The third prototype aircraft will move soon from Philadelphia to Marquette in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula to validate the AW609’s flight performance in known icing conditions, Leonardo says on 9 February.

The winter round of testing will keep the civil tiltrotor programme on track to receive airworthiness certification from the US Federal Aviation Administration in 2018.

The AW609 is the first fly-by-wire rotorcraft to apply for a commercial airworthiness certificate.

An interim investigation report released last June by Italy’s ANSV blamed the 2015 crash flawed control logic that reacted improperly to an unusual manoeuvre at the extreme limit of the AW609’s speed envelope.

The crash left Leonardo with the first prototype in Philadelphia and the third prototype in Italy. After flight testing resumed last year, the two aircraft traded places. The third prototype has since resumed flight trails to check out avionics and systems, performing basic hovering, hovering landing and maneouvres around Northeast Philadelphia Airport. The prototype will “shortly” perform short take-offs and climb up to 4,000ft, Leonardo says.

Leonardo also is working on the fourth AW609 prototype, which has been moved to the main production area in the Philadelphia factory to “ensure a smooth transition to the first production build aircraft” in 2018, the company adds.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Bell V-280 Valor Prepping for Flight-test Program
by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

- February 10, 2017, 4:00 AM

In a well-guarded hangar tucked away on the Bell Helicopter campus at Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport in Texas, a tightly knit team of dedicated technicians and engineers is putting the final touches on Bell’s next-generation tiltrotor, the V-280 Valor. If all goes as planned, the V-280, which was about 93 percent complete in late January, will fly sometime around September this year.

Designed to fulfill a requirement for new cost-effective and more efficient aircraft for the U.S.Department of Defense’s Future Vertical Lift program, the V-280 is the U.S. Army’s Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator (JMR-TD), “the flagship program anchoring the Army Aviation science and technology portfolio,” according to the Army.

Bell leveraged its experience with the V-22—also built in Amarillo—in designing the V-280. Both share design features such as composite wings and other structural elements, but there are significant differences that are apparent when viewing the two aircraft. The V-22 is much larger and capable of carrying a maximum of 32 passengers plus at least three crewmembers, while the V-280 can fit 14 passengers and four crew. The Navy and Marines required a rear ramp for loading/unloading, which adds complexity and weight to the V-22, but the crew enter and exit the V-280 via six-foot-wide fuselage doors under the wings. Also adding complexity to the V-22 is the gigantic spherical bearing mounted under the center wing section and the folding proprotors, which allows the V-22 to fold into a compact and more easily stored unit. The V-280’s wing is fixed to the fuselage, and its proprotors are about a foot shorter than the V-22’s.

Perhaps the biggest difference between the two aircraft is the way the proprotors tilt. On the V-22, the engines tilt up and down to provide the craft’s unique vertical lift and horizontal flight modes. The V-280’s engines are mounted in the nacelles and do not tilt. According to Bell, “The output shaft is connected to the drive system through a spiral bevel gearbox that transfers power to the fixed gearbox and proprotor gearbox, which rotates on two big spherical bearings driven by a conversion actuator mechanism.” The V-280’s tilting gearbox design vastly simplifies the V-22’s complex hydro-mechanical clockwork that provides the necessary tiltrotor action.

The V-280’s powerplant configuration offers other advantages, explained V-280 build team manager Scott Allen. When the V-22’s engines point skyward during vertical flight, the exhaust is directed onto the landing area, and this could cause a fire, say on a grassy area, or damage a ship’s flight deck (the Navy uses protective pads under the V-22 exhaust blast). The V-280 projects only proprotor airflow downwards, while the engines remain fixed in place horizontally, eliminating the hot exhaust problem. Another benefit is that the pilot’s field of view is improved, with much less machinery blocking the view along the wings, he explained.

Allen has been involved with the V-280 JMR-TD for four years, ever since it began as a preliminary design concept. Like Bell’s new 505 and 525, the V-280 was developed in Bell’s new digital design framework, which has helped keep costs down. The V-280 wing, for example, is estimated to cost less than half that of the V-22 wing, according to Allen. Designing the drawings for one of the V-22’s hydraulic systems took 700 to 800 manhours, compared to just 40 for the V-280. “Digital designs present huge opportunities,” he said.

The program faced many challenges, but the hand-picked team of top Bell engineers and technicians has been able to solve every one.

One challenge is because of the fixed wing mounting, which means that the V-280 will have to fly out of Amarillo, as it can’t be folded up like the V-22. Because of this, Bell had to build a ground-run stand, which features large ramps for the V-280 to roll up for installation in the test rig. The Amarillo Economic Development Corporation provided a $3 million grant to Bell to build the run stand.

While Bell built the V-280’s composite wing at its own facilities, the fuselage, made of aluminum frames and composite skins, was built by Spirit AeroSystems. The fuselage could eventually be all-composite, made using Spirit’s filament-winding machines, but that would depend on the Army’s level of comfort with composite structure. “I’d love to get to zero fasteners,” Allen said.

Flight control surfaces are composite, as are the proprotors. The V-280’s wing has 22 percent of the parts count of the V-22 wing; the V-22 wing is also more complex, with some dihedral that isn’t present in the V-280’s flat wing. Like the V-22, an interconnect shaft runs in the back of the wing, allowing either engine to power both proprotors in case of engine failure.

The V-280’s landing gear configuration is also unique; basically, it’s a taildragger, with two main landing gear up front and a large wheel on the aft fuselage, and all are retractable.

The empennage is a V-tail configuration, which some observers note is not the same as early drawings of Marine Corps V-280s with downward-tilting anhedral stabilizers. “That is one potential solution, but we haven’t evaluated it yet,” said Allen.

The V-280 is equipped with its own APU, mounted toward the top of the aft fuselage, and this can power utility systems and help start the aircraft’s GE T64-419 engines, each with more than 5,000 shp. The V-280 has three hydraulic systems running at 3,000 psi (compared to the V-22’s 5,000 psi), and up to two systems can fail while the remaining system powers the fly-by-wire flight controls.

Last year, Bell demonstrated a sophisticated new cockpit concept for the V-280, a single-display touchscreen that fills the entire instrument panel. The touchscreen display has integrated night-vision and synthetic vision capabilities and allows the pilot to customize layouts of various kinds of information.

In the V-280 JMR-TD, the cockpit is more standard, with dual Lockheed Martin PFDs and MFDs and dual FMSs. The fly-by-wire collective and cyclic are a similar shape as the Bell 525’s, and they are mechanically interconnected to provide a visual cue of control movement for both pilots.

V-280 specifications include a maximum speed of 280 knots, combat range of 500 to 800 nm, maximum self-deployable range of more than 2,100 nm and 13,000+ pounds of useful load.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top