Re: CVN-73 to replace Kitty Hawk in Japan in 2008
Along the asme subject line as the Kitty hawk the USN plans to shift CVN-73 to Yokuska in 2008. What a coindence! CVN-73 will arrive in Japan just in time for the Beijing olympics!..Just kidding..I think.
Pelimiary plans call for the USN to shift the Norfolk based USS
George Washington CVN-73 to Yokosuka Japn in 2008 to replace the USS
Kitty Hawk CV-63. I assume that the USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 or CVN-77
will take the CVN-73 spot in the massive Hampton roads base. So US
politicians ..shut-up!!!
Navy plans to move carrier George Washington to Japan
By DALE EISMAN, The Virginian-Pilot
© November 18, 2005
WASHINGTON — The Navy has decided to send the Norfolk-based aircraft
carrier George Washington to Japan to replace the aging carrier
Kitty Hawk when it is retired from service in 2008, a senior defense
official said Thursday.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told The
Virginian-Pilot that an announcement of the shift will be made
within a few weeks.
It will allow the Pentagon to keep a force of six carriers in the
Pacific, an area of growing concern to the Bush administration
because of China's aggressive efforts to upgrade its navy, but
probably leave only five flattops in the Atlantic Fleet.
The move raises the possibility that the carrier force at Norfolk
Naval Station could be cut from five to four, with a fifth Atlantic
carrier assigned to Mayport Naval Station , near Jacksonville, Fla.
Losing a carrier could drain about 3,000 jobs and hundreds of
millions of dollars annually from the Hampton Roads economy.
"There are just a lot of things that aren't final yet," cautioned
U.S. Rep. Thelma Drake, R-2nd District, who said Navy officials have
not yet briefed lawmakers on their plans.
She said she would be "extremely concerned" if the Navy tries to
shrink its Norfolk-based carrier force, but it's far from certain
that will occur.
"Nothing will happen fast," Drake said.
Norfolk is easily the Navy's largest hub for carriers, which along
with being a source of civic pride are a major engine for the local
economy. No other port has more than two flattops.
The loss of just one of the ships would drain about $225 million per
year from the local economy, according to a preliminary estimate
developed by the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission.
David Gist, a commission economist, said the estimate is a rough
calculation and could change depending on how the Navy executes the
transfer.
If the service sent the Washington's air wing and other ships in its
battle group along with the carrier, for example, the local economic
damage could swell to $982 million annually, he said.
That scenario may be unlikely because other ships and an air wing
already are in place in Japan with the Kitty Hawk.
The George Washington would be the first nuclear-powered ship to be
permanently stationed in Japan, the only nation ever attacked by
nuclear weapons.
The Japanese government agreed last month to allow a nuclear ship to
replace the oil-fired Kitty Hawk, but local opposition in the port
city of Yokosuka, where the ship would be stationed, could sour the
deal, Drake said.
Selecting a replacement for the Kitty Hawk has been a matter of some
delicacy for the Navy and the Bush administration. The Norfolk-based
Harry S. Truman and the Nimitz, based in San Diego, were ruled out
almost immediately because of President Truman's decision to use
nuclear weapons against Japan during World War II and Fleet Adm.
Chester Nimitz's role as a key leader of U.S. naval forces in the
war.
The carrier George H.W. Bush, which will enter service as the Kitty
Hawk retires, also was disqualified. The first President Bush flew
Navy torpedo bombers in battles with the Japanese from 1942 to 19 45.
The transfer also could be politically delicate at home. While
planning to send the George Washington to Japan, the Navy wants to
retire the carrier John F. Kennedy, now based in Mayport, and reduce
the overall carrier fleet to 11.
The Navy hasn't decided whether to replace the Kennedy in Mayport,
but the senior defense official indicated that the Atlantic Fleet
will retain five carriers with at least four of them in Norfolk.
A coalition of Virginia and Florida lawmakers blocked the Kennedy's
retirement earlier this year, forcing the Navy to keep the ship
until at least the middle of 2006, and legislation to require a 12-
carrier fleet is pending on Capitol Hill.
The number of carriers and their placement around the world are
major topics of the "Quadrennial Defense Review," a Pentagon study
of worldwide military threats and U.S. forces needed to meet them.
The review is to be completed and submitted to Congress early next
year, and defense officials have declined to speculate on what it
might recommend.
Adm. Edmund Giambastiani, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, told reporters this week that the Defense Department remains
committed to retiring the Kennedy. Other officials suggested
privately that administration plans to cut Pentagon spending by
$32 billion during the next five years will intensify pressure to
mothball the ship.
The Navy estimates retiring the conventionally powered Kennedy, now
38 years old and the most expensive-to-operate ship in the fleet,
will save about $200 million per year. Adm. Mi chael G. Mullen, the
chief of naval operations, endorsed the cut last month, telling
reporters that he's satisfied the service can execute its missions
with the 11 remaining flattops.
An aide to U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said Thursday that his
boss still thinks a 12-carrier fleet is "the right thing to do for
America " but also intends to press for facility improvements that
will allow Mayport to accommodate a nuclear-powered carrier.
That sets the stage for a struggle between Florida's congressional
delegation, backed by Gov. Jeb Bush – the president's brother and a
potential Republican presidential candidate in 2008 or beyond – and
a Virginia contingent led by U.S. Sen. John W. Warner, chairman of
the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. George Allen, another
GOP presidential aspirer