FriedRiceNSpice said:The F-22 was cut because it was no longer needed. No country possessed large numbers of advanced fighters to create a need for the F-22. The F-22 would only be necessary if another nation's fighter force could pose a serious threat to the USAF. If Chinese submarines can pose a serious threat to the USN, then the Virginia subs will be needed, and therefore will not be cut.
MIGleader said:traitor!!! i'd yell at you, but thats off topic.
so, subs do seem like the perfect solution for china. they are cheaper than most surface combatants. soon they will have so many of them. plus they are really hard to detect, and pack a punch.
soon china will have 12 song, 12 kilo, 4 yuan, 5 han, one xia, 2 type 93, and one type 94. add in all the mings and romeos that can act as sound decoys of distraction.
on the surface, use dozens of the new FAC combined with a few larger warships like the 52's and sovs.
in the sky, send in j-5 drones as decoys, as the main force use alot mkks and backfire bombers
this will assymetrical fleet will destroy any US cvbg.
Totoro said:Rush attacking an US CBG with subs that china has is close to impossible. They're just way too noisy when going full speed and that speed is still 10 knots slower than CBG speed. Subs would be useful for ambushing a CBG, as it was said before. even then, you'd basically get one chance for a coordinated attack and torpedo salvo as anything significiantly faster than 5 knots at battery power would help USN greatly at detecting the subs.
Like with an air attack, key is the numbers. overwhelm the defences.
There is no way to maneuver around the cbg to get into good attacking position. Protection is the same all around. If you want to attack it, you will have to fight through the defences and you will have to prepared for vast losses/casulties. If it's possible to use enough of airplane drones to make the US forces waste their resources on them (and here i'm talking about hundreds of drones) then the chances are getting pretty darn good. Still, you need to launch antiship missiles out of range of aegis reach and you need to launch them in sufficient numbers to break through the aegis. With all the ships in the CBG with all the SM2s, sea sparrows, RAMs and phalanx my rough estimate is close to 200 supersonic missiles if you wanna put the carrier out of comission. With all planes carrying those missiles, all the fighter cover, the drones, that pretty much means you must be able to launch and coordinate an air attack numbering close to 500 aircraft. That's a huge undertaking, something that needs lots of practice and time, and is something that'd be detected fairy early, giving the CBG the option to rethink it's course and perhaps even sail back, trying to get out of range.
can you provide the current stats of the US fleet? It's kind of hard to compare nuclear subs to the diesel subs.AssassinsMace said:Yawn!
The Pentagon uses China to try to scare Congress into spending more on the F-22 and F-35. Look at the result... CUTS! So what makes you think that Chinese subs are so special that the US would have to build Virginia class subs to counter? Are you actually saying that Chinese subs are so advanced that the current US fleet can't counter them? LOL!
Sounds like the same scare tactic as usual.
Totoro said:Rush attacking an US CBG with subs that china has is close to impossible. They're just way too noisy when going full speed and that speed is still 10 knots slower than CBG speed. Subs would be useful for ambushing a CBG, as it was said before. even then, you'd basically get one chance for a coordinated attack and torpedo salvo as anything significiantly faster than 5 knots at battery power would help USN greatly at detecting the subs.