US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Yesterday at 8:58 PM
now noticed
U.S. Navy, Raytheon deliver 4,000th Tomahawk Block IV cruise missile
August 15, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now partly related USNI News:
Navy, Raytheon Close to Finalizing Maritime Strike Tomahawk Missile Deal
The Navy and Raytheon are close to signing a deal to integrate a new sensor into the Tomahawk Land Attack Missile to allow the missile to attack moving targets at sea, the head of the Navy’s Tomahawk program told USNI News on Tuesday.

Once the deal is complete, Raytheon will start work to craft and install a sensor to convert a yet-to-be-determined number of Block IV TLAMs into a Maritime Strike Tomahawk variant, said Capt. Mark Johnson, Naval Air Systems Command PMA-280 program manager.

“We’re signing the contract now, there will be a couple of year development effort to determine the configuration of the seeker to go into the missile and a couple of years to take it out and test it to accurately know what the performance is so the fleet will have confidence in the system,” Johnson said following a ceremony celebrating Raytheon’s delivery of the 4000th TLAM to the Navy.
“When maritime is ready to be cut into the Tomahawk, we’ll work with the resource sponsor to find out what the right number is.”

Raytheon and the Navy are still determining the type of sensor that they’d likely use, company TLAM program manager Dave Adams told USNI News on Tuesday. He indicated that the final product could be a multi-mode seeker with a mix of passive and active sensors.

The sensor will be installed into some Block IV missiles doing their midlife recertification in addition to other upgrades.

“We’re upgrading the radio, the harnessing and the antenna for the communication. So every recertified missile will get an upgraded navigation and communication,” Johnson said.

The missiles will also receive an unspecified upgrade to allow TLAMs to operate in a GPS denied environment and a warhead upgrade.

The recertification effort for the Block IV weapons will start in 2019 with the first MST variants to enter the fleet in the early 2020s.

The MST was born in the midst of the surface Navy’s 2015 distributed lethality push and its effort to acquire more offensive weapons for the surface force.

While the Navy fielded an anti-ship variant of Tomahawk shortly in the 1990s, the sensor technology wasn’t sophisticated enough for long-range target discrimination and the weapons were quickly converted to standard land attack variants.

However,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
– with external guidance – proved that a Tomahawk could hit a moving maritime surface target at range with more assurance than the old Tomahawk Anti-Ship Missile (TASM) sensors.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work praised the test and used it as an example of the thinking behind the Third Offset Strategy in developing new capabilities at minimal cost.

“This is potentially a game changing capability for not a lot of cost. It’s a 1000 mile anti-ship cruise missile,” he said.
“It can be used by practically by our entire surface and submarine fleet.”
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
now partly related USNI News:
Navy, Raytheon Close to Finalizing Maritime Strike Tomahawk Missile Deal

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Semi related Lockheed has successfully tested the ship launch LRASM as well. The range is not as long as the Tomahawk however it is more than capable and certainly adds new capability to the Navy's 'distributed lethality' initiatives.

With that being said a 1000 mile range ship to ship F&F missile with self correcting target acquisition, autonomous guidance etc would certainly be a game changer.

An AB or Tico operating somewhere in the middle of the Philippines Sea can theoretically hit any vessel operating anywhere from Japan to the Philippines and Guam to Taiwan.

4 ABs can hit anything on westpac, SCS etc and 2 ABs can cover the Atlantic all the way from US cost to the Northern African seaboard!

VWIll06.jpg
 
Semi related Lockheed has successfully tested the ship launch LRASM as well. ...
you mean Desert Ship huh Jul 28, 2017
Yesterday at 8:35 AM

... looks like they're in the Desert Ship phase:
LRASM Demonstrates Surface Launch Capability
July 27, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Aug 1, 2017
Friday at 12:12 PM

now Jane's
LRASM firing demonstrates canister launch

01 August 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


... the rest is behind paywall in the source which is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and contains this picture:
p1635887.jpg
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Northrop Grumman Helps U.S. Navy Fire Scout Squadron Make History

Northrop Grumman Fire Scout instructors helped an elite detachment of Fire Scout Air Vehicle Operators (AVO) from the U.S. Navy’s Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 23 train and rehearse for a historic two-part demonstration. The AVOs trained for a real-time mission-set that handed off two autonomous, radar-equipped MQ-8B Fire Scout helicopters between multiple ground stations, a program first. The exercise also provided critical, real-time targeting information to a manned MH-60S Seahawk helicopter during a weeklong exercise off the coast of southern California.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
I now read this story from the real world:
Mattis: Continuing resolution ‘about as unwise as can be’
With the fiscal year set to expire at the end of September, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis is warning that a stopgap funding measure would have a serious impact on a Pentagon attempting to modernize its capabilities.


Operating under a continuing resolution, or CR, would be “about as unwise as can be,” Mattis told reporters this week at the Pentagon.

It is a tradition that all those serving as secretary of defense have grown used to over the past five years: sounding the alarm about what a CR will do to readiness and modernization, publicly begging Congress to fix the problem and then getting on with life when the budget is inevitably passed toward the end of the year.

There are indications that Congress will follow that pattern this year, with the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to keep things working after September before a final budget is arranged around Christmas. But until that situation sorts itself out, Mattis will most likely follow the script laid out by Ash Carter, Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta — sounding the alarm about the impact of a CR, which freezes funding at levels from the previous year while preventing new start programs from launching.

“We cannot start new programs, so where you’re trying to adjust to the changing character of warfare — electronic warfare, space issues, cyber issues, counter-UAS efforts … we cannot start those new programs,” Mattis said of a CR. “It just creates unpredictability. It makes us rigid. We cannot deal with new and revealing threats. We know our enemies are not standing still.”

Industry is also keeping a wary eye on the budget situation, with two major trade groups telling their members this week to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in case a government shutdown occurs. Mattis acknowledged the impact on industry, noting that a CR forces those companies to hit pause on investing in new projects.

“American industry says, ‘Whoa, you know, I can start doing something here.’ And then there’s no budget for it down the road, so I’ve just put a lot of money into my capital investment, and now, it’s going to sit and idle,” he said of industry response.

The secretary said he would work closely with the defense committees to “try and avoid the damage” that would result from a CR, although he was careful to say, “I wouldn’t call it lobbying.”

Asked how confident he was that Congress would handle the budget, Mattis demurred, saying, “I save those kinds of feelings for others. I just do the job.”
source is DefenseNews
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Re designated USS for duty needs
ESB Expeditionary Mobile Base variant of the Montford Point/ESD Expeditionary Transfer Dock capable to host 3LCACs and vehicles different.

Navy to Commission Middle East-based Expeditionary Sea Base Lewis B. Puller as a Warship

The Navy will re-designate its first Expeditionary Landing Base ship a warship this week, converting the Military Sealift Command ship USNS Lewis B. Puller (T-ESB-3) into USS Lewis B. Puller (ESB-3) so it can better meet operational needs abroad, USNI News has learned.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re designated USS for duty needs
ESB Expeditionary Mobile Base variant of the Montford Point/ESD Expeditionary Transfer Dock capable to host 3LCACs and vehicles different.
Inteesting.

Does this mean that it will be a an all US Navy crew then now. Does it also mean they are going to give the vessel the self defense it needs with perhaps Phalanx and Sea-RAM?

I hope so. If they are going to designate it a US Navy combat ship they most certainly should.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Inteesting.

Does this mean that it will be a an all US Navy crew then now. Does it also mean they are going to give the vessel the self defense it needs with perhaps Phalanx and Sea-RAM?

I hope so. If they are going to designate it a US Navy combat ship they most certainly should.
In this case normaly no civil aboard i think
 
Top