US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

this is interesting:
Yesterday at 2:44 PM
Turkey agrees to pay Russia $2.5B for S-400 missile systems, official says
Published 18 hours ago
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


LOL noticed this topic in Russian Internet; most guys seemed to think it's something like this:
LOL!
but:

Q: Can I ask you about Turkey? They announced yesterday that they're going to buy four Russian S-400s, advanced anti-air. Does that put any tension in the U.S. military to Turkish military relationship? That they're a NATO ally buying a very advanced Russian hardware?

SEC. MATTIS: The problem is, how do you interoperate in the NATO system with Russians? They'll never interoperate. They're built -- you don't just layer on interoperability at the end. So, we'll have to see, does it go through? Do they actually employ it, do they employ it only in one area? All that kind of stuff. But I -- you know, we'll have to take a look at it. Obviously, it's not going to be interoperable with NATO systems.

Q: Does the U.S. approve of them buying Russian...

(CROSSTALK)

SEC. MATTIS: This is a sovereign decision, so.
Media Availability With Secretary Mattis in the Pentagon
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(I noticed this linked at gazeta.ru:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)

I mean, Turkey with both F-35 and Triumph, seriously?
 
in case you didn't know
Mattis 'very comfortable' with House, Senate defense bills
Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis said he is “very comfortable” with the priorities forming the backbones of both the House and Senate defense bills, despite some outstanding issues.

“I’m confident, based on the questions I went through with both the House and the Senate, and with Republicans and Democrats in both houses, that they all recognize we need to rebuild the military,” Mattis told reporters Friday.

“How we parse that out, I’ll just say the theme is consistent. I did not confront adversarial challenges that we need to downsize the military’s budget or we don’t have gaps in our readiness. We’re working all those details out,” the secretary continued. “I’m sure there are some areas of disagreement, but there are enormous areas of agreement.”

Earlier in the day, the House passed its version of the NDAA, voting to support a $696.5 billion budget for the Pentagon. Of that, $621.5 billion is in base funding and $75 billion is allocated to the wartime Overseas Contingency Operations account.

The House bill included support for the creation of a Space Corps, a new branch of the military focused on space issues. Mattis and the White House have expressed concerns over the idea, with Mattis writing that “a separate service that would likely present a narrower and even parochial approach to space operations vice an integrated one we’re constructing under our current approach.”

Asked about the Space Corps on Friday, Mattis chuckled and said, “We’ll see.”

The Space Corps is one area that will be a point of contention between the Senate and House when the Senate finalizes its defense bill. The full Senate has yet to host a vote on the $700-billion NDAA passed June 28 by the Senate Armed Services Committee. Dealing with the NDAA appears to be on the backburner, however, while the Senate wrestles with health care.

Mattis said he has been talking with various senators but indicated the issues being discussed as relatively small and that the relationship is “not adversarial at all.”

“It’s the kind of things that go into making sausage. It’s the little pieces,” Mattis said. “You just try to be as collaborative as you can, give them the information they need, tell you where you stand on it and why. … By and large, even if you give them information on some contentious issue, they are still open to it. So far, we have a very good relationship up there.”

“I’m very comfortable with the priorities assigned by the House and Senate right now.”
source is DefenseNews
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
your 'hopefully' is probably increased by
"... invoking another section of budget law, section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Congress circumvented the spending caps by deeming their priorities an emergency."
The Sequester Died on May 5
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


(otherwise

"Legally, Congress can spend no more than $549 billion on base defense in FY18, according to the BCA caps." according to the most recent AirForceMag article
House Passes $696 Billion NDAA
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



would apply, I guess)
related:
Mattis on 2018 Budget: ‘We Have Got to Get a Bill Passed’
Congress is working up budgets that bust spending caps, with little evidence of a deal to avoid automatic cuts.

The Trump administration and congressional GOP leaders say they want to give the military a budget boost in 2018, but the spending bills they are drawing up are so far beyond legal limits that they’ll be automatically chopped back down — unless a much broader budget deal can be worked out on Capitol Hill. What does Defense Secretary Jim Mattis make of all this?

He just wants to know how much he has to spend.

“What we need most of all is a degree of predictability to this budget and that means we have got to get a bill passed,” Mattis said Friday during an impromptu conversation with several reporters at the Pentagon.

That was the former Marine’s response to this question: how much confidence do you have that Congress will be able to make a deal to exceed the limits imposed by the 2010 Budget Control Act?

The Trump administration has requested $639.1 billion for the military in 2018. That includes $574.5 billion in the base budget and $64.6 billion in funds for Overseas Contingency Operations — what used to be called the war supplemental. But the base budget is is $52 billion beyond the cap set by the BCA — the OCO fund is exempt — and the bills that Congress is working on are bigger yet.

Here’s the problem: if Congress passes a budget above that cap without repealing or modifying the Budget Control Act, funds are cut from across all Pentagon coffers. This happened in 2013, and military leaders say they are still feeling the effects. In several other years, deals have been cut that allowed spending beyond the limits.

In meetings with lawmakers in recent weeks, Mattis said, Republicans and Democrats “all recognize we need to rebuild the military.”

“I did not confront adversarial challenges that we need to downsize the military budget or that we don’t have gaps in our readiness,” he said. “We’re working all of those details out right now to include responding to requests for information on specific things.”

“I’m very comfortable with the priorities assigned by the House and Senate right now.”

On Friday, the House on Friday
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— the defense policy bill — approving $696 billion for the Pentagon. The Senate Armed Services Committee has approved a $700 billion NDAA. Both of those bills include about $30 billion for nuclear weapons, funds that are overseen by the Energy Department.

The House Appropriations Committee
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a bill that includes $658.1 billion for the Pentagon. The Senate has not yet taken up the measure.

So how do congressional leaders think these spending plans will evade the roughly $523 billion limit on the base budget? One possible solution: cram the excess into OCO.
source is DefenseOne
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
63th Burke first " restart " since Murphy commissionned in 2012 also based to Pearl harbor USN have now 86 MSC : 22 Ticonderoga + 1 Zumwalt + 63 Burke again 2 others for 2017 whose Peralta in 2 weeks !

 
Jun 30, 2017
related to the post right above:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


and
Naval Air Station students to resume T-45 Goshawk flights this summer
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
Toxic Air From T-45 Engine May Be Poisoning U.S. Navy Pilots
Jul 17, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the search for the root cause of a recent spike in hypoxialike cockpit incidents that leave student pilots disoriented and short of breath, the U.S. Navy is beginning to look more closely at the quality of the air that comes off the McDonnel Douglas T-45 Goshawk’s engine and feeds into the oxygen generator system.

Fleets across the Navy and U.S. Air Force have been plagued by a sharp increase in these so-called physiological episodes in recent months, where pilots experience symptoms that could be related to lack of oxygen during flight. The issue is a complex one that the Pentagon has so far been unable to resolve. It is not even clear that what the pilots are experiencing is actually hypoxia—defined as an insufficient supply of oxygen—or something else that causes similar symptoms, such as a change in cabin pressure, contaminated air, or even too much oxygen.

For T-45 pilots, who were grounded in April, the Navy believes the problem lies with the airflow through the Cobham-built Onboard Oxygen Generation System (OBOGS), a complex process that begins in the Goshawk’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
F405 engine. The aircraft “is not equipped to continuously provide clean, dry air” to OBOGS, according to the Navy’s comprehensive review of the recent incidents; the result is contaminants can enter the pilot’s breathing air, potentially causing hypoxia.

The Navy’s Hypoxia Mystery
Navy still struggling to find root cause of hypoxialike cockpit incidents in T-45

One possible cause is a toxin entering the airflow from the T-45 engine

Navy to begin testing sample of uninstalled engines using comprehensive contaminant detection methods

Commander, Naval Air Forces hopes to lift T-45 restrictions in July

The Navy says it is now looking “very closely” at the quality of the bleed air coming off the T-45’s engine as a possible source of the problem, and plans to begin testing a sample of uninstalled engines using “comprehensive” contaminant detection methods this month, the service confirmed to Aviation Week.

Rolls-Royce is cooperating closely with the Navy on the investigation, according to company spokesman George McLaren. He stressed that the service is examining “many potential root causes.”

Although there are many possible reasons for the incidents, aircrew reports seem to support the theory that the symptoms seen in the T-45 are caused by a toxin in the airflow. In incidents of true hypoxia—known as hypoxic hypoxia, or a lack of oxygen flow to the lungs—symptoms abate once pilots use the emergency oxygen. But many T-45 pilots had persistent symptoms that sometimes lasted for hours after landing—in one instance, the pilot could not even remember landing, said one congressional staffer familiar with the issue.

These symptoms fall in line with what is called histotoxic hypoxia, which occurs when the body’s tissues are not able to use the oxygen that has been delivered to them, and is often caused by a contaminant in the airflow.

The rapid onset or the delayed recognition of the symptoms in some cases led many T-45 pilots to speculate that what they experienced was histotoxic hypoxia due to a contaminant, according to the Navy’s report.

“Histotoxic hypoxia symptoms are highly variable across individuals, may not be immediately recognized, and 100% emergency oxygen may not quickly alleviate the symptoms,” the report states.

The problem is that there are countless opportunities during the OBOGS cycle for contaminants to enter the airflow. In the T-45, the bleed air from the compressor section of the engine flows through a cooling heat exchanger and enters the OBOGS, where it first passes through a heater, particulate filter and pressure reducer. The air is then directed to a sieve bed material loaded into two identical canisters. Each canister’s sieve bed material absorbs nitrogen, passing the concentrated oxygen to a mixing plenum—or box—and then to the pilot’s regulator and mask. The nitrogen absorbed in the sieve bed is purged from the system.

The ability of the OBOGS to produce usable oxygen depends on clean, dry air, delivered to the air crew in the right pressure and volume, flowing into the system. Moisture is a particular problem; due to the sieve bed’s high affinity for water, any contaminants trapped there could be exchanged for moisture and then released from the OBOGS into aircrew breathing air.

The Navy has identified several modifications it hopes will fix the problem, according to the report, including installing a water separator into the OBOGS bleed air line to filter out any moisture from the airflow.

Vice Adm. Mike Shoemaker, Naval Air Forces commander, recently indicated instructor pilots will resume flying the T-45 with OBOGS in July, with students resuming flight training later in the month. Currently, students are grounded; instructor pilots are flying with a modified mask configuration that doesn’t pipe in air from the OBOGS. Instead, the pilot breathes the ambient air in the cockpit, restricting altitude.

“The safety of our aircrew remains my number one priority,” says Shoemaker. “After months of using a modified mask and configuration that circumvented the OBOGS, new mitigation measures have been put in place that give us the confidence to safely resume flight training using the system. These mitigations monitor the breathing gas and alert and protect our aircrew, as well as incorporate new maintenance procedures to ensure the systems are clean and working properly prior to flight.”

But despite extensive testing, so far the Navy has been unsuccessful in finding a contaminant at any point in the airflow. The service has already brought several aircraft from the training squadrons to NAS Patuxent River, and torn them apart in search of a potential source of the problem, Vice Adm. Paul Grosklags, commander of Naval Air Systems Command, told Congress in June.

“We took every component, every single component in that [breathing gas pack] out of the aircraft, starting with the engine and going through the entire system, inspecting all the piping in between, all the way up to the mask and the vests that the air crew wear,” said Grosklags. “We’ve subjected each one of those individual components to extremes of testing, extremes of environmental conditions, in excess of what we would ever expect to see in the aircraft. And we still have not been able to find what we would consider a proximate cause of contamination or something being released into that gas pack.”

The Navy’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Hornet and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Growler fleets have also been plagued by incidents of hypoxia, as well as the Air Force’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at Luke AFB, Arizona.
 
Jun 27, 2017
Jun 10, 2017

and the story goes on:
House lawmakers authorize $103M for A-10 wings to save 3 squadrons from retiring
source is DefenseNews
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
Air Force Weighs Scrapping A-10 Replacement
Jul 17, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The U.S. Air Force is looking closely at the future of close-in warfare, but the service’s top general says that future may not include a direct replacement for the A-10 Warthog.

The Air Force has for years contemplated building a follow-on, dedicated close-air support (CAS) platform to replace the Warthog when it reaches the end of its service life, but that effort now appears to have stalled. When asked whether the service is taking steps to develop a single-role “A-X,” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein said “not yet.”

So does that mean a single-mission CAS platform will eventually go away? “Maybe,” Goldfein says.

“I don’t disagree that a single-role platform sets an incredibly high bar for the rest of the force,” he said during a wide-ranging interview with Aviation Week July 16. “But remember, [combatant commanders] have got the entire spectrum of conflict that I’ve got to support, from the highest end, the lowest end and everything in between, and I’ve got a certain amount of money that I’ve got to use to build the best Air Force that money can buy.”

Goldfein spoke with Aviation Week on an Air Force C-40 during the flight back from his visit to the Royal International Air Tattoo, the world’s largest military air show, at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Fairford, England.

As the air component commander in Afghanistan, Goldfein saw firsthand how the Air Force now relies on a family of systems, not just the A-10, for the close-air support (CAS) mission. The Warthog was not always his first choice to protect soldiers in battle: in the mountainous terrain of the east, an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
was the best choice to quickly navigate the peaks and valleys; in the volatile west, where operations could quickly take a turn for the worse, the multirole
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
would give maximum agility; for the north, a B-1B bomber—with its endurance and large payload—worked best.

“If we can start having a conversation about that family of systems, and not which one weapon system is the most important, we’re going to actually have a 21st-century close-air-support discussion,” Goldfein said. “There’s very few mission sets that we have where I’m throwing a single bullet at it.”

The Air Force is planning to fly the Warthog until the mid-2020s, although it needs additional funding in order to keep all nine A-10 squadrons in the skies past 2021. But the question of whether the Air Force will build a direct A-10 replacement hangs on adequate funding and stable budgets, Goldfein stressed.

Sequestration and budget uncertainty—including year after year of continuing resolutions—wreak havoc on the military’s ability to plan, he said.

“It’s impossible to predict where I would go with that kind of a strategic trade relative to the amount of topline I have and where it fits,” he said. “Nothing comes for free.”

Before making a decision, Goldfein will consult the CAS community about what the future of the mission looks like, because it may not look like the past. Experts argue that the A-10 performs well in an environment of total air dominance, like Iraq and Afghanistan, but as advanced anti-air weapons and surface-to-air missiles proliferate, it becomes more and more dangerous to fly a bulky, unstealthy Warthog into battle.

“Before we have any conversation about replacements ... we want to make sure that anything we talk about is moving us forward into new ways of doing business,” Goldfein said.
no word inside about one-size-fits-all F-35
 
Published on Jul 17, 2017
Already deployed on the USS Ponce amphibious transport ship is the US Navy's first - in fact, the world's first - active laser weapon.

I've noticed what looks like a PlayStation controller:
j7qV2.jpg
 

Holt_Allen

New Member
Registered Member


I've noticed what looks like a PlayStation controller:
j7qV2.jpg
Though it is videogame like in nature, it doesn't match any of the DualShock controllers in design. At one point I remember seeing some branch of the United States military using Xbox 360 controllers.
 
Top